Rola mikroelementow w uprawie buraka cukrowego

• Autorzy: Wrobel S
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Concentration of sugar beet growing areas and drastic decrease of the domestic FYM production means deterioration of soil supply with micronutrients and the same needs of their replenishment. In investigations performed over the network of 115 sugar beet control fields located across the country, micronutrient deficiencies-primarily boron, copper and molybdenum were stated. These are the micronutrients of crucial importance for sugar beet. Boron deficiency leads to decrease of sugar beet root yield even by 20%. At commonly occurring available boron deficiencies in domestic soils, boron fertilizer application to sugar beet appears to be necessary. Copper and molybdenum are the components of enzymes responsible for effective N utilization by plants and reducing concentration of detrimental N-α-amin in the beet roots. Fertilization with copper is an advisable procedure on soils rich in organic matter, where Cu availability for plants is limited. Significant impact of molybdenum application on saccharose accumulation level in sugar beet roots stated in experiments should be emphasized. Manganese and zinc deficits occur less frequently and they should be expected primarily under conditions of no-FYM soil management and soil reaction close to neutral.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

wymagania pokarmowe; mangan; buraki cukrowe; mikroelementy; molibden; plonowanie; bor [chem.]; niedobor skladnikow; uprawa roslin; cynk; nawozenie; potrzeby pokarmowe; miedz

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 51
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.45-59,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Wrobel S

• Instytut Uprawy, Nawozenia i Gleboznawstwa, ul.Sw. Macieja 55, 0-244 Wroclaw

Bibliografia

• [1] Allison M.F. Last P.J. Bean K.M. 1996. Responses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) to foliar sprays of copper. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 72(2): 219-225.
• [2] Benedycka Z., Krauze A. 1988. Badanie efektywności nawożenia mikroelementami w zmianowaniu. Acta Acad. Agricult. Techn. Olst. Agr. 45: 43-51.
• [3] Bergmann W. 1986. Bemerkungen und Tabellen zur analytischen Pflanzendiagnose der Pflanzen oder Blattanalyse. VEB Fischer Verlag. Jena: 38 ss.
• [4] Bergmann W., Neubert P. 1976. Pflanzendiagnose und Pflanzenanalyse. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena: 711 ss.
• [5] Bobrzecka D., Krauze A. 1989. Nawożenie miedzią, w zmianowaniu. Acta Acad. Agricult. Techn. Olst. Agr. 48: 117-134.
• [6] Bondok M.A. 1996. The role of boron in regulating growth, yield and hormonal balance in sugar beet. Annals of Agricult. Sci. Cairo 41(1): 15-33.
• [7] Christenson D.R., Brimhall P.B., Hubbel L., Bricker C.E. 2000. Yield of sugar beet, soybean, corn, field bean and wheat as affected by lime application on alkaline soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analisis 31(9-10): 1145-1154.
• [8] Czuba R. 1986. Zmiany zawartości składników pokarmowych w roślinach uprawnych na terenie kraju w zależności od nawożenia. Mat. Symp. Wpływ nawożenia na jakość plonów. ART Olsztyn 24-25. 06. z. 1: 34-42.
• [9] Czuba R. 2000. Mikroelementy we współczesnych systemach nawożenia. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Rol. 471(2): 161-170.
• [10] Dębowski M., Kucharzewski A. 2000. Odczyn i zawartość mikroelementów w glebach Polski. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Rol. 471(1): 627-636
• [11] Domska D., Bobrzecka D., Wojtkowiak K. 1996. Wpływ dokarmiania dolistnego miedzią i borem na dynamikę zawartości azotanów w liściach buraka cukrowego. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 440: 81-87.
• [12] Draycott A.P., Allison M.F., Armstrong M.J. 1997. Changes in fertilizer usage in sugar beet production. Proceedings of the 60th HRB Congress, Cambridge, 1-3 July 1997, Ashfield Green Farm, Wickhambrook, Suffolk, CB8 8UZ, UK: 39-54.
• [13] Erjala M. 1986. Control of manganese deficiency in sugar beet by placement of a manganated fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 58: 215-220.
• [14] Faber A. 1992. Bezpośrednie i następcze działanie nawożenia borem, miedzią, molibdenem i cynkiem w zmianowaniu czteropolowym. Wyd. IUNG Puławy, H(2): 81 ss.
• [15] Finck A. 1982. Fertilizers and fertilization. Verlag Chemie. Weinheim, Deerfield Beach, Florida-Basel: 438 ss.
• [16] Fotyma M., Mercik S. 1995. Chemia rolna. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: 354 ss.
• [17] Gezgin S., Önder M., Dursun N., Hamurcu M., Sade B., Babaoglu, M.2001. Effects of various boron, zinc and NPK levels on the yield and sugar content of sugar beet. Proceedings of International Workshop Boron in Plant and Animal Nutrition. Bonn. 23-27.07.2001: 21-24.
• [18] Gutmański I. 2003. Uprawa buraka cukrowego. Wyd. IUNG Puławy: 104 ss.
• [19] Haneklaus S., Schnug E., Knudsen L. 1998. Minimum factors for the mineral nutrition of field grown sugar beet in northem Germany and eastem Denmark. Aspects of Applied Biology 52: 57-64.
• [20] Hassanin M.A., Abuldahab A. 1991. Effect of foliar fertilization with some micronutrients on the yield and quality of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture, Egypt, Cairo 42(3): 663-672.
• [21] Henriques F.S. 2001. Loss of blade photosynthetic area and of chloroplasts' photochemical capacity account for reduced CO₂ assimilation rates in zinc-deficient sugar beet leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology 158(7): 915-919.
• [22] Hussein M.A. 2002. Effect of boron on the yield, elemental content and quality characteristics of sugar beet grown in calcareous soil amended with sulphvr. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research 47(2): 201-207.
• [23] Kalinowska-Zdun M. 1999. Burak cukrowy. W: Szczegółowa uprawa roślin. Praca zbiorowa pod red. Jasińskiej i Koteckiego. Wyd. AR Wrocław I: 385-434.
• [24] Kevresan S., Petrovic N., Popovic M., Kandrac J. 1998. Effect of heavy metals on nitrate and protein metabolism in sugar beet. Biologia Plantarum 41(2): 235-240.
• [25] Krahmer R., Sattelmacher B. 1995. Determination of the Mn efficiency of crop plants in pot experiments. Kongressband VDLUFA Kongress in Garmisch-Partenkirchen 09.1994: 117-120.
• [26] Krauze A., Benedycka Z., Bobrzecka D. 1988. Działanie boru w czteroletnim zmianowamu. Zesz. Nauk. ART. Olsztyn, R 45: 53-59.
• [27] Krauze A., Benedycka Z., Bobrzecka D., Domska D. 1983. Wpływ następczy nawożenia molibdenem. Zesz. Nauk. ART. Olsztyn, R 36(242): 213-220.
• [28] Lawiński H., Potarzycki J., Baer A. 2002. Wpływ systemu uprawy i nawożenia azotem na pobranie mikroelementów przez buraki cukrowe. Biuletyn IHAR 222: 101-109.
• [29] Monged N., El-Manhaly M., Mohamed A., Abo-El-Fath M. 1996. Effect of some trace elements fertilizers on sugar beet. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 71(4): 979-986.
• [30] Narayan D., Chandel A., Singh G. 1989. Effect of boron fertilization on yield and quality of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 32(2): 164-168.
• [31] Nielsen F.H. 2002. The nutritional importance of boron throughout the life cycle of higher animals and humans. W: Boron in Plant and Animal Nutrition. Goldbach H.E., Rerkasem B., Wimmer M.A., Brown P.H., Thellier M., Bell R.W. red. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York: 37-50.
• [32] Orlovius K., Horst W., Schenk M.K., Burkert A. 2001. Effect of foliar fertilization with magnesium, sulfur, manganese and boron to sugar beet, oilseed rape, and cereals. Plant Nutrition Kluwer Academic Publishers: 788-789.
• [33] Prośba-Białczyk U., Spiak Z., Mydlarski M. 2000. Wpływ nawożenia na zawartość mikroelementów w buraku cukrowym. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Rol. 471: 441-462.
• [34] Rynek Cukru - stan i perspektywy. 2002. Wyd. Ministerstwa Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi 22: 43 ss.
• [35] Shorrocks V.M. 1992. Boron - a global appraisal of the occurrence, diagnosis and correction of boron deficiency. International symposium on the role of micronutrients in balanced plant nutrition. Washington, USA, Sulphur Institute: 39-54.
• [36] Stockfish N., Koch H.J. 2002. Reaction of sugar beet to boron fertilizer application in experiments. W: Boron in Plant and Animal Nutrition. Goldbach H.E., Rerkasem B., Wimmer M.A., Brown P.H., Thellier M., Bell R.W. red.: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York: 381-386.
• [37] Stoyanov D., Atanassova I., Stratieva S. 1997. Increase of sugar beet and sunflower yields under Mn and Al foliar spraying. Pochvoznanie, Agrokhimiya y Ekologya 32(3): 16-20.
• [38] Stoyanov D., Sedlarska B., Stratieva S. 1998. Effect of zinc and boron dressing of sugar beet grown on leached chernozem-smolnitsa. Soil Science and Agrochemistry Sofia. XXV(1): 9-14.
• [39] Sun S.J., Li F.S., Wan Y., Zheng G.C. 1994. Effects of zinc and potassium on dry matter accumulation of sugar beet in mid-late growing season. China Sugarbeet 4: 26-29.
• [40] Tisdale S.L., Nelson W.L., Beaton J.D. 1985. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Macmillan Publishing Company New York. Fourth edition: 754 ss.
• [41] Toma S., Lisnik S., Veliksar S., Kaush M. 1991. Regulation of adaptive reactions and plant productivity by means of trace elements. Bull. Academ. de Stiinte a Republ. Moldova 4: 3-11.
• [42] Wallace A., Wallace G. 1993. Limiting factors, high yields and law of the maximum. Hortic. Rev. 15: 413-452.
• [43] Wróbel S. 2002. Określenie potrzeb nawożenia buraka cukrowego mikroelementami. Rozprawa habilitacyjna. Wyd. IUNG Puławy. Monografie i Rozprawy Naukowe. 2: 96 ss.
• [44] Wyszyński Z., Kalinowska-Zdun M., Mądry W., Laudański Z., Roszkowska B., Rozbicki J. 1998. Agronomical and Environmental Factors Affecting Sugar Beet Yielding in Central and Eastern Poland. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 29(3-4): 183-192.
• [45] Zalecenia nawozowe. 1990. Praca zbiorowa. Cześć I. Liczby graniczne do wyceny zawartości w glebach makro i mikroelementów. Wyd. IUNG Puławy, P (44): 34 ss.
• [46] Zorn W., Prausse A. 1993. Manganese content of cereals, maize and beet as an indicator of soil acidity. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernehrung und Bodenkunde 156(4): 371-376.