Taksonomia i systematyka w nowoczesnej ochronie roslin

• Autorzy: Boczek J , Dabrowski Z.T.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Since the eighties a distinct decrease in outlays for, and a number of specialists in taxonomy in the world, including the USA and Great Britain, were observed. During last decade, however, this had a serious bearing in modern plant protection. If effective, all the methods of plant protection but particularly quarantine, plant resistance and biological methods have to be initiated on proper species determination of arthropods. Besides morphological, several new methods are now in use in the taxonomy, particularly the molecular taxonomy. Erroneous identifications are often very expensive. This review refers to own and other authors, experiences.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

faunistyka; taksonomia; szkodniki roslin; ochrona roslin; entomologia stosowana; systematyka; taksonomia molekularna; odpornosc odmian; kwarantanna; metody molekularne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 52
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.31-41,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Boczek J

• Szkola Glowna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, ul.Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warszawa

autor

Dabrowski Z.T.

Bibliografia

• [1] Becerra J.M., Valdewcasas A.G. 2004. Landmark superimposition for taxonomic identification. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 81: 267-274.
• [2] Boczek J. 1968. Badania faunistyczno-systematyczne a potrzeby entomologii stosowanej. Pol. Pismo Entomol. 38(4): 907-927.
• [3] Boczek J. (red.) 1994. Diagnostyka szkodników roślin i ich wrogów naturalnych. Wyd. SGGW: 328 ss.
• [4] Boczek J. (red.) 1996. Diagnostyka szkodników roślin i ich wrogów naturalnych. t. 2: 385 ss.
• [5] Boczek J. (red.) 1999. Diagnostyka szkodników roślin i ich wrogów naturalnych. t. 3: 351 ss.
• [6] Boczek J. (red.) 2001. Diagnostyka szkodników roślin i ich wrogów naturalnych. t. 4: 532 ss.
• [7] Cruickshank R.H. 2002. Molecular markers for the phyllogenetics of mites and ticks. Syst. Applied Acarology 7: 3-14.
• [8] Dąbrowski Z.T. 1986. Comparative studies of Cicadulina leafhoppers in West Africa. Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of econ. importance, Provo, Utah, USA: 35-39.
• [9] Dąbrowski Z.T. 1997. Distribution of Cicadulina leafhoppers and maize streak virus occurence in Africa. Insect Science and its Application 18: 171-186.
• [10] Dąbrowski Z.T. 2003. Metody sanitarne i higieniczne jako podstawa integrowanej ochrony przed szkodnikami magazynowymi w Kanadzie. Biul. PSPDDD 3: 30-32.
• [11] Dąbrowski Z.T., Ćwikła P.S. 1991. Some new observations on Cicadulina leafhoppers taxonomic structures. Insect Sci. Applic. 12: 237-247.
• [12] De Bach P. 1960. The importance of taxonomy to biological control as ilustrated by the cryptic history of Aphytis holoxanthum n.sp. a parasite of Aonidiella aurantii. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 53: 701-705.
• [13] Disney H. 1998. Rescue plan needed for taxonomy. Nature 394: 120.
• [14] Garcia B.A., Moriyama E.N., Powell J.R.2001. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): phylogenetic relationships. J. Med. Entomol. 38: 675-683.
• [15] Gerstmeier R., Sedlmeier D. 2004. Molekularbiologie, Faunistik und Zoogeographie. Acta Entomol. Slovenica 12: 15-26.
• [16] Godfray H.C. 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature 417: 17-19.
• [17] Kędzior M., Shi A., Lewandowski M. 2003. Porównanie fragmentów niekodujących ITS2 DNA dwóch bliźniaczych gatunków szpecieli (Acari: Eriophyidae) z jabłoni i gruszy. Mat. 28 symp. akaralog., Łagów.
• [18] Kot J. 1962. Kruszynek, pasożyt owadów szkodliwych. Warszawa.
• [19] Labruna M.B., Mcbride J.W., Bouyer D.H., Camargo L.M., Camargo E.P., Walker D.H. 2004. Molecular evidence for a spotted fever group Rickettsia species in the tick Amlyomma longirostre in Brazil. J. Med. Entomol. 41: 533-537.
• [20] Leal W.S., Kuwahara Y., Suzuki T., Nakao H. 1989. Chemical taxonomy of economically important Tyrophagus mites (Acariformes, Acaridae). Agric. Biol. Chem. 53: 3279-3284.
• [21] Lin C.P., Danforth B.N. 2004. How do insect nuclear and mitochondrial gene substitution patterns differ? Insights from Bayesian analyses of combined databases. Molec. Phyllogen. Evolution 30: 686-702.
• [22] Liu Y.C. 2004. Molecular identification of a plant quarantine pest (Frankliniella occidentalis) by one-tube nested PCR targeting ribosomal DNA intemal transcribed spacer region. Plant Prot. Bull. Taipei. 46: 27-46.
• [23] Nardi F., Spinsanti G., Boor J.L., Carapelli A., Dallai R., Frati F. 2003. Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic. Science 299: 1887-1889.
• [24] Neuenschwander P., Hammonsd N.O., Gutierrez A.P., Cudjoe A.R., Adjakloe R., Baumgartner J.U., Regev U. 1989. Impact assessment of the biological control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti MATILE-FERRERO (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) by the introduced parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi (DE SANTIS) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 79: 579-594.
• [25] Ortis-Rivas B., Moya A., Martinez-Torres D. 2004. Molecular systematics of aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae): new insight from the long-wavelenght opsin gene. Molec. Phyllogen Evolution 30: 24-37.
• [26] Paquin PO., Hedin M. 2004. The power and perils of „molecular taxonomy": a case study of eyeless and endangered Cicurina (Araneae: Dictynidae) from Texas caves. Molecular Ecol. 13: 3239-3255.
• [27] Pimentel D. 1965. Improved pest control practices. Presidents Advisory Committee, White House. 227-291.
• [28] Ritzerow S., Konrad H., Stauffer C. 2004. Phyllogeography of the Eurasian pine shoot beetle Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Europ. J. Entomol. 101: 13-19.
• [29] Sabrosky C. W. 1964. Taxonomie entomology in the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 10: 2111-2220.
• [30] Schmidt S., Nauman I.D., Barro P.J. 2001. Encarsia species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) of Australia and Pacific Islands attacking Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) - a pictorial key and description of four new species. Bull. Entomol. Res. 91: 369-387.
• [31] Shi A., Boczek J. 2003. Morphology of two sibling species of eriophyid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea), Eriophyes pyri and E. mali. Proc. Kongres Akarol., Merinda, Meksyk.
• [32] Simon B., Cenis J.L., Demichelis S., Rapisarda C., Caciagli P., Bosco D. 2003. Survey of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotypes in Italy with the description of a new biotype (T) from Euphorbia characias. Bull. Entomol. Res. 93: 259-264.
• [33] Toyoshima S., Hinomoto N. 2004. Itraspecific variation of reproductive characteristics of Amblyseius californicus (McGREGOR) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39: 351-355.
• [34] Uilenberg G., Thiaucourt F., Jongejan F. 2004. On molecular taxonomy: what is in a name. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 32: 301-312.
• [35] Viggiani G. 2001. History and classification of the Trichogrammatidae. Bollet. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. ,,Filippo Silvestri" 57: 41-53.
• [36] Webb M.D. 1987. Species recognition in Cicadulina leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), vectors of pathogens of Gramineae. Bull. Entomol. Res. 77: 683-712.