Anatomical characteristics of hypocotyl of sugar beets different in sugar content

• Autorzy: Sliwinska E , Dziamski A. , Steen P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Six seedling hypocotyl anatomical characters of sugar beet diploid lines and triploid hybrids were measured. Root yield and sugar content of these lines and hybrids were evaluated in replicated field trials. Some of the studied hypocotyl characters: the diameter of the central core, the diameter of parenchymatic cells outside the central core and the width of xylem, correlated negatively with sugar content and positively with root yield. This suggests that these parameters can be used in preliminary selection of sugar-beet breeding material. Introducing such criteria into the breeding process could speed up the selection and reduce the number of expensive field trials.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cell size; plant genetics; vascular tissue; sucrose concentration; Beta vulgaris; root yield; genotype; sugar content; hybrid; tracheid; central core; xylem; hypocotyl; parenchyma cell; phloem; sugar-beet

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Applied Genetics
• Rocznik: 1995
• Tom: 36
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.229-239,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Sliwinska E

• Technical and Agricultural University, Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Dziamski A.

autor

Steen P.

Bibliografia

• ARTSCHWAGER E. (1926). Anatomy of the vegetative organs of the sugar beet. J. Agrie. Res. 33/2: 143-176.
• ARTSCHWAGER E. (1930). A study of the structure of sugar beets in relation to sugar content and type. J. Agrie. Res. 40/10: 867-915.
• DONEY D.L. (1979). Seedling physiology and sugarbeet yield. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 20(4): 399-418.
• DONEY D.L. (1983). Sugarbeet root yield and sucrose concentration: physiology and genetics. Sugarbeet Res. Ext. Rep. 14: 216-219.
• DONEY D.L. (1984a). Selection for potential sucrose concentration in 7-day-old sugar- beet seedlings. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 22(3-4): 205-219.
• DONEY D.L. (1984b). Selection for cell size division rate in young sugarbeet plants. Sugar Beet Res. Ext. Rep. 15: 194-198.
• DONEY D.L., THEURER J.C. (1976). Hypocotyl diameter as a predictive selection criterion in sugarbeet. Crop Sci. 16: 513-515.
• DONEY D.L., THEURER J.C. (1983). Genetics of cell size and sucrose concentration in sugarbeet. Crop Sci. 23: 904-907.
• DONEY D.L., THEURER J.C. (1990). Osmolality of L19 type sugarbeet germplasm. J. Sugar Beet Res. 27(3-4): 81-89.
• DONEY D.L., WYSE R.E., THEURER J.C. (1981). The relationship between cell size, yield and sucrose concentration of the sugarbeet root. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61: 447-453.
• HECKER R.J. (1967). Evaluation of three sugar beet breeding methods. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 14(4): 309-318.
• IWATA T., TSUDA CH. (1986). Variations in the quantitative characters of seedlings among sugar beet lines. Proc. Sugar Beet Res. Asso., Japan 28: 34-38.
• MILFORD G.F.J. (1973). The growth and development of the storage root of sugar beet. Ann. Appl. Biol. 75: 427-438.
• ŚLIWIŃSKA E. (1991). Wielkość komórek jako pomocnicze kryterium selekcyjne w hodowli buraka cukrowego. [Cell size as na accessory selection criterion in the sugar-beet breeding]. Hodowla Rośl. Aklim. Nasienn. 35(5/6): 27-52.
• WYSE R. (1979). Parameters controlling sucrose content and yield of sugarbeet roots. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 20: 369-385.