Effect of addition of feed antibiotic or probiotic on performance and composition of intestinal microflora of pigs

• Autorzy: Rekiel A. , Gajewska J. , Wiecek J. , Miszczyk A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the individual two-stage system, being ended with the slaughter and slaughter evaluation of 32 crossbred pigs, the complete mixtures with the addition of antibiotic flavomycin or probiotic (strain of Pedicoccus acidilactici bacteria MA18/5M) (during the first fattening stage) were employed. Post-mortem quantitative and qualitative bacteriological tests and quantitative mycological tests on the determination of the contents of duodenum, jejunum, ileum and large intestine were carried out. The comparable results of fattening and slaughter evaluation of pigs in the groups were obtained. After administration of probiotic, the number of acidifying bacteria was increased and that of Enterobacteriaceae family decreased. The application of biostimulator in fattening occurred to be favourable from the production point of view and seems to be an suitable alternative to feed antibiotics.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pig; antibiotic; fattening; growing-finishing pig; probiotic; slaughter value; microflora; feed additive; feed

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Animal Husbandry
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 08
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume8/issue4/art-32.html

Twórcy

autor

Rekiel A.

• Warsaw Agricultural University, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Gajewska J.

autor

Wiecek J.

autor

Miszczyk A.

Bibliografia

• AOAC, 1990. Association of Official Analitical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition. Arlington, VA.
• Buchanan R.E., Gibbons N.E. (Ed.), 1974. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 8th ed., Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore
• Doyle M.E., 2001. Alternatives to antibiotic use for growth promotion in animal husbandry. Food Research Institute, 1-17.
• Grela E., Krasucki W., Semeniuk V., Pecka S., Matras J., 2001. Influence of some immunomodulation additives to growing-finishing diets on pig performance, carcass traits and some blood indices. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 10(2), 231-236.
• Jasek S., Kalinowska R., Knecht D., Pawiak R., 1992. Wpływ dodatku probiotyku Bio-gen na efekty produkcyjne i wskazniki fizjologiczne trzody chlewnej. Wpływ dodatku probiotyku Biogen na wskaŸniki użytkowoœci loch i wyniki odchowu prosišt [The influence of probiotic Biogen on production results and physiological parameters of swine. The influence of probiotic Biogen on reproduction results and rearing results of piglets]. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., Monogr. i Rozpr. 31, 217-228 [in Polish].
• Kirchgatterer A., Knoflach P., 2004. Natural therapy instead of chemistry? Probiotics in gastroenterology. Acta Med. Austriaca 31(1), 13-17.
• Kornegay E.T., Risley C.R., 1996. Nutrient digestibilities of a cornsoybean meal diet as influenced by Bacillus products fed to finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 74, 779-805.
• Kot B., Jakubczak A., Bukowski K., 2000. Antagonistyczne działanie bakterii fermentacji mlekowej w stosunku do wybranych drobnoustrojów [The antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria against selected bacteria]. Med. Weter. 56(1) 53-57 [in Polish].
• Kumprecht I., Zobač P., 1998. Study of the effect of a combined preparation containing Enterococcus faecium M-74 and mannan oligosaccharides in diets for weanling piglets. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 43, 477-481.
• Niemiałtowski M., Toka F.N., 1996. Bakterie jelitowe i ich toksyny – od mikroskopu do biologii molekularnej [w: Choroby zakazne i inwazyjne przewodu pokarmowego ludzi i zwierzšt] [The bacteria and their toxins – from microscope to molecular biology. Infectious and invasive diseases of intestinal tract humen and animals]. Mateiały Konferencyjne. Kazimierz Dolny 24-26 paŸdziernika1996 [in Polish].
• Reid G., Friendship R., 2002. Alternatives to antibiotic use: probiotics for the gut. Anim. Biotechnol. 13(1), 97-112.
• Różycki M., 1996. Zasady postępowania przy ocenie swiń w Stacjach Kontroli Użytkowosci Rzeznej Trzody Chlewnej. Stan hodowli i wyniki oceny swiń [Procedures of pig evaluation at pig performance testing stations. State of breeding and evaluation results of swine]. IZ XIV, 69-82 [in Polish].
• Schrezenmeir J., de Vrese M., 2001. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics – approaching a definition. Am. Society Clin. Nutr. 73, 361-364.
• Stavric S., Kornegay E.T., 1995. Microbial probiotics for pigs and poultry. [in: Biotech-nology in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding]. Ed. R.J. Wallace, A. Chesson: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Wienheim, 206-231.
• Sokół J., Karas J., Stecka K., Bobel B.K., Grzybowski R., 2001. Użytecznosc probiotyków wieloskładnikowych w żywieniu tuczników [Usability of multicomponen-tial probiotics in feeding of fatteners]. Anim. Sci. Special. number, 224-229 [in Polish].
• SPSS 10.0 for Windows user’s guide, 2000 by SPSS Ins.
• Verstegen M.W., Williams B.A., 2002. Alternatives to the use of antibiotics as growth promoters for monogastric animals. Anim. Biotechnol. 13(1), 113-127.
• Zimmermann B., Bauer E., Mosenthin R., 2001. Pro- and prebiotics in pig nutrition – potential modulators of gut healthy? J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10, 47-56.