Change in the quality of diet during pregnancy in comparison with WHO and EU recommendations - environmental and sociodemographic conditions

• Autorzy: Bojar I. , Wdowiak L. , Humeniuk E. , Blaziak P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The organism of a pregnant woman constitutes the environment for the developing embryo. The outside world influencing the mother’s organism affects not only her health but also her unborn baby’s health. The aim of the work is to analyze the qualitative changes in pregnant women’s diet and to specify the sociodemographic and environmental conditions determining the quality of the diet. The research was carried out among 150 pregnant women who came to randomly chosen antenatal clinics in Lublin. The tool used for research was a personally designed questionnaire. The average consumption of particular groups of products was counted. Pregnant women not only increased the amount of food they consumed but they also changed the proportions. Despite the fact that the consumption of diary products was still too much, their role significantly decreased (2.40). Women also cut down on fruit in comparison with other products (2.76). However, the amounts of meat (1.30), vegetables (4.26) and crop products (4.29) rose. Moreover, place of living impacted on the frequency of the consumption of vegetables and education – of diary products.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pregnancy; health protection; socio-demographic condition; dairy product; meat; education; food consumption; woman; crop product; environment condition; vegetable; fruit; diet; European Union; recommendation; pregnant woman; human nutrition

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 13
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.281-286,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Bojar I.

• Medical University of Lublin, Chodzki 1, 20-093 Lublin, Poland

autor

Wdowiak L.

autor

Humeniuk E.

autor

Blaziak P.

Bibliografia

• 1. Anderson AS: Pregnancy as a time for dietary change. Proc Nutr Soc 2001, 60, 497-504.
• 2. Arija V, Cuco G, Vila J, Iranzo R, Fernandez-Ballart J: Food consumption, dietary habits and nutritional status of the population of Reus: follow-up from preconception through pregnancy and after birth. Med Clin (Barc) 2004, 123, 5-11.
• 3. Barker DJP: Foetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 1995, 311, 171-174.
• 4. Barker DJP: Foetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease. BMJ Publishing Group, London 1992.
• 5. Bodnar LM, Siega-Riz AM: A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy detects variation In diet and differences by sociodemographic factors. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5(6), 801-809.
• 6. Erkkola M, Karppinen M, Javanainen J, Rasaneu L, Knip M, Virtanen SM: Validity and reproducibility of food frequency questionnaire for pregnant Finnish women. Am J Epidemiol 2001, 154(5), 466-476.
• 7. Fidanza AA, Fidanza R: A nutrition study involving a group of pregnant women in Assisi, Italy. Part 1: Anthropometry, dietary intake and nutrition knowledge, practices and attitudes. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 1986, 56(4), 373-380.
• 8. Fidanza AA, Simonetti MS, Cucchia LM: A nutrition study involving a group of pregnant women in Assisi, Italy. Part 2: Determination of vitamin nutriture. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 1986, 56(4), 381-386.
• 9. Fowels ER, Gabrielson M: First trimester predictors of diet and birth outcomes in low-income pregnant women. J Community Health Nurs 2005, 22(2), 117-130.
• 10. Godfrey KM: Materna regulation of fetal development and Heath In adult life. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998, 78(2), 41-50.
• 11. Hakes CN, Barker DJ, Clark PM, Cox LJ, Fall C, Osmond C, Winter PD: Foetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64. BMJ 1991, 303, 1019-1022.
• 12. Haste FM, Brooke OG, Anderson HR, Bland JM, Peacock JL: Social determinants of nutrient intake in smokers and non-smokers during pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Health 1990, 44(3), 205-209.
• 13. Healthy food and nutrition for women and their families. Training Course for Health Professionals. WHO. Regional Office For Europe. Regional Office For Unicef. Geneva 2001, Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltics.
• 14. Heszen-Niejodek I: Promocja zdrowia z perspektywy psychologicznej. Sztuka Leczenia 2000, 3, 9-18.
• 15. Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Gundersen C, Dole N: Psychosocial factors and socioeconomic indicators are associated with household food insecurity among pregnant women. J Nutr 2006, 136(1), 177-182.
• 16. Narodowy Program Zdrowia 1996-2005. Ministerstwo Zdrowia i Opieki Społecznej 1996.
• 17. Szczepaniak B, Górecka D, Flaczek E: Preferencje i częstotliwość spożycia owoców wśród dziewcząt oraz kobiet w ciąży. Acta Sci Pol 2004, 3(1), 175-185.
• 18. Szostak-Węgierek D, Cichocka A: Żywienie kobiet w ciąży. PZWL, Warszawa 2005.
• 19. Thiele S, Mensink G, Beitz R: Determinants of diet quality. Public Health Nutr 2004, 7(1), 29-37.