Genetic variation in Polish populations of Callitriche cophocarpa

• Autorzy: Buczkowska K , Szoszkiewicz K. , Baczkiewicz A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Callitriche cophocarpa Sendtn. is typically a submerged macrophyte, widespread throughout Poland. It is a monoecious plant with unisexual flowers which are produced only in the floating rosettes. We studied the allozyme variation of 9 populations of C. cophocarpa from Polish rivers in order to establish its genetic structure, mode of reproduction, clonal structure, and gene flow between populations. Genetic variation of the examined populations was low. Only 7 of the 12 loci studied were polymorphic. One of the 24 detected multilocus genotypes was widespread, found in 8 populations, and the remaining genotypes were rare. The mean percentage of polymorphic loci within populations was 19.44 and the mean number of alleles per locus was 1.231, with mean values of 0.0219 observed and 0.0421 expected heterozygosity. Fixation indices calculated for each population showed a significant deficit of heterozygotes. The study showed high differentiation between populations, with almost 50% of the total variation in C. cophocarpa located between populations. Allozyme studies showed a high contribution of clonal reproduction. The populations of C. cophocarpa are isolated from each another, and the existing physical barriers decrease the probability of gene flow between populations and cross-fertilization. Gene flow within rivers is more probable.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

macrophyte; Callitriche cophocarpa; Polish population; genetic variation; water starwort; allozyme; genetic structure; inbreeding; clonal growth; location; Poland

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: 50
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.63-70,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Buczkowska K

• Department of Genetics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland

autor

Szoszkiewicz K.

autor

Baczkiewicz A.

Bibliografia

• Aspinwall N, and Christian T. 1992. Clonal structure, genotypic diversity, and seed production in populations of Filipendula rubra (Rosaceae) from the Northcentral United States. American Journal of Botany 79: 294-299.
• Barrett SCH, Echert CG, and Husband BC. 1993. Evolutionary processes in aquatic plant populations. Aquatic Botany 44: 105-145.
• Baczkiewicz A, Szoszkiewicz K, Cichocka J, Celiński K, Drapikowska M, and Buczkowska K. 2007. Isozyme patterns of Callitriche cophocarpa, C. stagnalis and C. platycarpa from 13 Polish rivers. Biological Letters 44: 103-114.
• Cooper RL, Osborn JM, and Philbrick CT. 2000. Comparative pollen morphology and ultrastructure of the Callitrichceae. American Journal of Botany 87: 161-175.
• Crawford DL, Landolt E, Les DH, and Tepe E. 1997. Allozyme variation and the taxonomy of Wolffiella. Aquatic Botany 58: 43-54.
• Demars BOL, and Gornal RJ. 2003. Identification of British species of Callitriche by means of isozymes. Watsonia 24: 389-399.
• Diggle PK, Lower S, and Ranker TA. 1998. Clonal diversity in alpine populations of Polygonum viviparum (Polygonaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 606-615.
• Edwards AL, and Sharitz RR. 2000. Population genetics of two rare perennials in isolated wetlands: Sagittaria isoetiformis and S. teres (Alismataceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 1147-1158.
• Ellstrand NC, and Roose ML. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. American Journal of Botany 74: 123-131.
• Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995).
• Hamrick, JL, and Godt MJW. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, and Weir BS [eds], Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources, 43-63. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Haury J, Peltre MC, Trémolières M, Barbe J, Thiébaut G, Bernez I, Chatenet HDP, Haan-Archipol G, Muller S, Dutartre A, Laplace-Treyture C, Cazaubon A, and Lambert-Servien E. 2006. A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution - the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (1BMR): its application to different types of river and pollution. Hydrobiologia 570: 153-158.
• Hofstra DE, Adam KD, and Clayton JS. 1995. Isozyme variation in New Zealand populations of Myriophyllum and Potamogeton species. Aquatic Botany 52: 121-131.
• Hollingsworth PM, Preston CD, and Gornall RJ. 1996. Genetic variability in two hydrophilous species of Potamogeton, P. pectinatus and P. filiformis (Potamogetonaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 202: 233-254.
• Holmes NTH, Newman JR, Chadd S, Rouen KJ, Saint L, and Dawson FH. 1999. Mean trophic rank: a users manual, R&D Technical Report E38. Environment Agency of England and Wales, Bristol.
• Kaplan Z, and Štépánek J. 2003. Genetic variation within and between populations of Potamogeton pusillus agg. Plant Systematics and Evolution 239: 95-112.
• Laushman RH. 1993. Population genetics of hydrophilous angiosperms. Aquatic Botany 44: 147-158.
• Les DH. 1988. Breeding system, population structure, and evolution in hydrophilous angiosperms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 819-835.
• Les DH. 1991. Genetic diversity in the monoecious hydrophile Cerotophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1070-1082.
• Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 238-292.
• Philbrick CT, and Les DH. 2000. Phylogenetic studies in Callitriche: implication for interpretation of ecological, karyological and pollination system evolution. Aquatic Botany 68: 123-141.
• Piélou EC. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
• Podbielkowski Z, and Tomaszewicz H. 1982. Zarys hydrobotaniki. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
• Rich TCG, and Jermy AC. 1998. Plant Crib 1998. Botanical Society of the British Isles, London.
• Ritland K. 1989. Genetic differentiation, diversity, and inbreeding in the mountain monkeyflower (Mimulus caespitosus) of the Washington Cascades. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 2017-2024.
• Santamaría L. 2002. Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecologica 23: 137-154.
• Savidge JP. 1960.The experimental taxonomy of European Callitriche. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 171: 128-130.
• Schaumburg J, Schranz C, Foerster J, Gutowski A, Hofmann G, Meilinger P, Schneider S, and Schmedtje U. 2004. Ecological classification of macrophytes and phytobenthos for rivers in Germany according to the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34: 283-301.
• Schlueter MA, and Guttman SI. 1998. Gene flow and genetic diversity of turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum. Banks ex König, in the lower Florida Keys. Aquatic Botany 61: 147-164.
• Schotsman HD. 1972. Callitrichaceae. In: Tutin TG et al. [eds.], Flora Europaea, vol. 3, 123-126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Silander JA, Jr. 1985. Microevolution in clonal plants. In: Jackson JBC, Buss LW and Cook RE [eds.], Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. 107-152. Yale University Press, London.
• Stace C. 1997. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Vermeersch S, and Triest L. 2006. Distylic Hottonia palustris shows high reproductive success in small populations despite low genetic variability. Aquatic Botany 84: 354-358.
• Weir BS. 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Publ. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Weir BS, and Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
• Wendel JF, and Weeden NF. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DE and Soltis PS [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 5-45. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
• Wright S. 1951. The genetic structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 323-354.
• Wright S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
• Yeh F, Rongcai Y, and Boyle T. 2000. POPGENE-1.32: A free program for the analysis of genetic variation among and within populations using co-dominant and dominant markers. Department of Renewable Resources at the University of Alberta, Canada, at http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/index. htm.
• Zając A, and Zając M. 2001. Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce. Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany Jagiellonian University Press, Kraków.