Stan badan nad metodami zwalczania szkodliwych slimakow

• Autorzy: Kozlowski J
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

In some European countries slugs can cause significant damages in a wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops. In Poland over the last decade they became a senous threat to arable crops, mainly to winter oilseed rape, winter cereals and vegetables. Crops are affected by numerous species of slugs but under Polish climatic condiho. ns th e most 1· mportant are: Deroceras reticulatum and in some regions Arion lusitanicus, Arion rufus and Arion distinctus. Slug control is carried out with molluscicide pellets and agronomic measures. These methods are commonly used in various countries and are considered as one of the most effective in plant protection against slugs. Simultaneously non-synthetic compounds are tested for slug control. The aim of these surveys is to find and implement into practice these alternative methods utilizing natural plant products such as: attractants, phago-stimulants, antifeedants and natural molluscicides in slug control. The important role in strategy of plant protection against slugs may play alternative food sources for slugs. There are some chemical compounds occurring naturally in plants that show activity against slugs. It has been possible to select a number of compounds that demonstrated stimulative, inhibitive or ceasing effect on slug feeding. Several compounds with poisonous effect on slugs were found out as weil. However, it seems that only few will have a chance to be implemented into practice.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zwalczanie szkodnikow; zabiegi agrotechniczne; szkodniki roslin; moluskocydy; slimaki; atraktanty; antyfidanty

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: 50
• Numer: 5
• Opis fizyczny: s.25-42,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kozlowski J

• Instytut Ochrony Roslin, ul.Miczurina 20, 60-318 Poznan

Bibliografia

• [1] Adewunmi C.O., Sofowora E.A. 1980. Preliminary screening of some plant extracts for molluscicidal activity. Med. Plant Res. 39: 57-65.
• [2] Airey W.J. 1988. The influence of alternative food on tuber damage by slugs. J. Mollusc. Stud. 54: 131-138.
• [3] Airey W.J., Henderson I.F., Pickett J.A., Scott G.C., Stephenson J.W., Woodcock C.M. 1989. Novel chemical approaches to mollusc control. Slugs and Snails in World Agriculture. B.C.P.C. Monograph 41: 301-307.
• [4] Barone M., Frank T. 1999. Effects of plant extracts on the feeding behaviour of the slug Arion lusitanicus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 134: 341-345.
• [5] Chatfield J.E. 1976. Studies on food and feeding in some European land molluscs. J. Conch. 29: 5-20.
• [6] Clark S.J., Dodds C.J., Henderson I.F., Martin A.P. 1997. A bioassay for screening materials influencing feeding in the field slug Deroceras reticulatum MÜLL. (Mollusca Pulmonata). Ann. Appl. Biol. 130: 379-385.
• [7] Coaker T.H. 1987. Cultural methods and control. W:,,The Crop Integrated Pest Management." A.J. Burn, T.H. Coaker, P.C. Jepson P.C. (red.). Academic Press, London: 69-88.
• [8] Coker P.D. 1967. Damage to lichnes by Gastropods. Lichenologist 3: 428-429.
• [9] Cook R.T., Bailey S.E.R., McCrohan C.R. 1996. Slug preferences for winter wheat cultivars and common agricultural weeds. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 866-872.
• [10] Cook R.T., Bailey S.E.R., McCrohan C.R. 1997. The potential for common weeds to reduce slug damage to winter wheat: laboratory and field studies. J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 79-87.
• [11] Desbuquois C., Daguzan J. 1995. The influence of ingestive conditioning on food choices in the land snail Helix aspersa MÜLL. (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora). J Mollusc. Stud. 61: 353-360.
• [12] Dirzo R. 1980. Experimental studies on slug-plant interactions. I. The acceptability of thirty plant species to the slug Agriolimax caruanae. J. Ecol. 68: 981-998.
• [13] Dirzo R., Harper J.L. 1982. Experimental studies on slug-plant interactions III. Differences in the acceptability of individual plants of Trifolium repens to slugs and snails. J. Ecol. 70(1): 101-117.
• [14] Duval D.M. 1971. A note on the acceptability of various weeds food for Agriolimax reticulatus MÜLL. J. Conch. 27: 249-251.
• [15] Frank T. 1998. Slug damage and numbers of the slug pests, Arion lusitanicus and Deroceras reticulatum, in oilseed rape grown beside sown wildflower strips. Agric. Ecos. Environ. 67: 67-78.
• [16] Frank T. 1998. The role of different slug species in damage to oilseed rape bordering on sown wildflower strips. Ann. Appl. Biol. 133: 483-493.
• [17] Gien D.M., Spaull A.M., Mowat D.J., Green D.B., Jackson A.W. 1993. Crop monitoring to assess the risk of slug damage to winter wheat in the United Kingdom. Ann. Appl. Biol. 122: 161-172.
• [18] Godan D. 1999. Angewandte Malakologie. Heft 367. Berlin: 280 ss.
• [19] Grime G.P., Blythe G.M. 1969. Relationships between snails and vegetation at the Winnats Pass. J. Ecol. 57: 45-66.
• [20] Grime G.P., MacPherson-Stewart S.F., Dearman R.S. 1968. An investigation of leaf palatability using the snail Cepaea nemoralis L. J. Ecol. 56: 405-420.
• [21] Hanley M.E., Fenner M., Edwards P.J. 1995. The effect of seedling age on the likelihood of herbivory by the slug Deroceras reticulatum. Funct. Ecol. 9: 754-759.
• [22] Henderson I.F., Martin A.P., Perry J.N. 1992. Improving slug baits: the effects of some phagostimulants and molluscicides on ingestion by slug, Deroceras reticulatum MÜLL. (Pulmonata: Limacidae). Ann. Appl. Biol. 121: 423-430.
• [23] Henderson I.F., Parker K.A. 1986. Problems in developing chemical control of slugs. Asp. Appl. Biol. 13: 341-347.
• [24] Jager J.C. 1971. A quantitative study of a chemoresponse to sugars in Lymnea stagnalis (L.). Netcherlans J. Zool. 21: 1-59.
• [25] Jennings T.J., Barkham P.J. 1975. Food of slugs in mixed deciduous woodlands. Oikos 26: 211-221.
• [26] Kozłowski J. 1999. Ślimaki (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora) - niedoceniane szkodniki roślin uprawnych w Polsce. Post. Nauk Roln. 6: 39-50.
• [27] Kozłowski J. 2000. Ślimaki występujące w uprawach roślin i metody ich zwalczania. Wyd. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, Poznań: 40 ss.
• [28] Kozłowski J. 2002. Ochrona rzepaku i zbóż przed ślimakami. Wyd. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, Poznań: 20 ss.
• [29] Kozłowski J., Kozłowska M. 2000. Weeds as a supplementary or alternative food for Arion lusitanicus MABILLE (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora). J. Conch. 37(1): 75-79.
• [30] Kozłowski J., Kozłowska M. 2002. Assessment of plant damages and intensity of Deroceras reticulatum MÜLL. occurrence in winter oilseed rape and winter wheat. J. Plant Protection Res. 42(3): 229-237.
• [31] Kubo I., Komatsu S., Masamitsu O. 1986. Molluscicides from the cashew Anacardium occidentale and their large-scale isolation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 34: 970-973.
• [32] Kubo I., Matsumoto A. 1984. Molluscicides from olive Olea europaea and their efficient isolation by countercurrent chromatographies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 32: 687-688.
• [33] Levin D.A. 1973. The role of trichomes in plant defence. Quart. Rev. Biol. 48: 3-15.
• [34] Marston A., Hostettmann K. 1985. Plant Molluscicides. Phytoch. 24: 639-652.
• [35] Martin T.J., Forrest J.D. 1969. Development of Draza in Great Britain. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer 22: 205-243.
• [36] Mason C.F. 1970. Food, feeding rate and assimilation of woodland snails. Oecologia 4: 358-373.
• [37] Mesch H. 1996. Was hilft gegen Schnecken im Raps? Top Agrar 8: 52-53.
• [38] Molgaard P. 1986. Food plantpreferences by slugs and snails: a simplemethod to evaluate the relative palatability of the food plants. Bioch. Syst. and Ecol. 14: 113-121.
• [39] Pallant D. 1969. The food of the grey field slug (Agriolimax reticulatus MÜLL.) in woodland. J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 391-397.
• [40] Pallant D. 1972. The food of the grey field slug (Agriolimax reticulatus MÜLL.) in grassland. J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 761-769.
• [41] Pickett J.A., Stephenson J. W. 1980. Plant volatiles and components influencing behaviour of the field slug Deroceras reticulatum MÜLL. J. Chem. Ecol. 6: 435-444.
• [42] Port C.H., Port G.R. 1986. The biology and behaviour of slugs in relation to crop damage and control. Agric. Zool. Rev. 1: 255-299.
• [43] Raut S.K., Ghose K.C. 1983. The role of non-crop plants in the protection of crop plants against the pestiferous snail Achatina fulcia. Malacol. Rev. 16: 95-96.
• [44] Riccio R., Iorizzi M., Minale L. 1988. Starfish saponins. Part 34. Novel steroidal glycoside sulphates from the starfish Asterias amurensis. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Translation I: 1337-1347.
• [45] Scott G.C., Griffiths D.C., Stephenson J.W. 1977. A laboratory method for testing seed treatments for the control of slug in cereals. Proc. British Crop Protection Conf.: Pests and Diseases 129-134.
• [46] South A. 1992. Terrestrial slugs. Biology, ecology and control. Chapman and Hall, London: 428 ss.
• [47] Stephenson J.W., Pickert J.A. 1977. Responses of slugs to plant constituents. Rothamsted Exp. Stat. Report 1: 1-100.
• [48] Tilborg S.T., Christensen C., Cornett C. 1993. Molluscicidal saponins from Phytolalacca dodencandra. Phytochem. 32(5): 1167-1171.
• [49] Webbe G., Lambert J.D.H. 1983. Plants that kill snails and prospects for disease control. Nature 302: 754 ss.
• [50] Wiktor A. 1989. Limacoidea et Zonitoidea nuda. Ślimaki pomrowioksztaltne (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora). Fauna Polski - Fauna Poloniae, Warszawa, PWN, T.12: 208 ss.