PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2003 | 45 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Karyology of nine lily genotypes

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Chromosome morphology was studied in lily genotypes L. candidum, L. x formolongi, L. henryi and L. pumilum, and cultivars ‘Alma Ata,’ ‘Expression,’ ‘Marco Polo,’ ‘Muscadet’ and ‘Star Gazer’ belonging to the horticultural group Oriental hybrids. All genotypes tested represented 2n = 2x = 24 chromosomes. Chromosomal markers were established after Feulgen and silver staining, from analysis of the chromosome length and position of the primary and secondary constrictions. For each chromosome the arm index was calculated. Based on these data, idiograms were drawn. For the genotypes analyzed the markers were the secondary constrictions, as confirmed by silver staining. Chromosome length can be used as a marker in only a few cases. From 4 to 10 chromosomes could be identified using secondary constrictions as markers, depending on the genotype. Markers are proposed for each possible species x cultivar and cultivar x species combination.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

45

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.159-168,fig.

Twórcy

autor
  • Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture, skr.pocz.105, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Bajer A. 1959. Change in length and volume of mitotic chromosomes in living cells. Hereditas 45: 579-596.
  • BosemarkN, and Bormotov VE. 1962. Chromosome morphology in homozygous line of sugar beet. Hereditas 69: 205-212.
  • Brutovská R, Kušniriková P, Bogyiová E, and Čellárová E. 2000. Karyotype analysis of Hypericum perforatum L. Biologia Plantarum 43: 133-136.
  • Cheng BF, Heneen WK, and Chen BY. 1995. Mitotic karyotypes of Brassica campestris and Brassica alboglabra and identification of the B. alboglabra chromosomes in an addition line. Genome 38: 313-319.
  • Feldmaier C, and McRae J. 1982. Lilien. Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH & CO Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Fernandez AM, Nakazaki T, and Tanisaka T. 1996. Development of diploid and triploid interspecific hybrids between Lilium longiflorum and L. concolor by ovary slice culture. Plant Breeding 115: 167-171.
  • Georgi H. 1985. The significance of apogamy and apomictic phenomena in lily hybridization. The Lily Yearbook NALS 85: 45-46.
  • Giddings GD, and Rees H, 1992. A Nicotiana gametosomatic hybrid and its progenies. Journal of Experimental Botany 43: 419-425.
  • Golczyk H, and Joachimiak A. 1999. Karyotype structure and interphase chromatic organization in Rhoeo spathacea (Sw.) Stearn (Commelinaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 41: 143-150.
  • Hasterok R, Jenkins G, Langdon T, and Jones RN. 2001. Ribosomal DNA is an effective marker of Brassica chromosomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 486-490.
  • Heimburger M. 1962. Comparison of chromosome size in species of Anemone and their hybrids. Chromosoma 13: 328-340.
  • Heneen WK. 1962. Chromosome morphology in inbred rye. Hereditas 48: 182-200.
  • Hizume M, Sato S, and Tanaka A. 1980. A highly reproducible method of nucleolus organizing regions staining in plants. Stain Technology 55: 87-90.
  • Hoshi Y, Pląder W, and Malepszy S. 1998. New C-banding pattern for chromosome identification in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Breeding 117: 77-82.
  • Joachimiak A, Ilnicki T, and Mitka J. 1999. Karyological study on Aconitum lasiocarpum (Rchb.) Gayer (Ranunculaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 41: 205-211.
  • Keep E. 1975. Currants and gooseberries. In: Janick JJ, and Moore JN [ed.], Advances in fruit breeding, 197-242. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette.
  • Keller ERJ, Schubert I, Fuchs J, and Meister, A. 1996. Interspecific crosses of onion with distant Allium species and characterization of the presumed hybrids by means of flow cytometry, karyotype analysis and genomic in situ hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 417-424.
  • Kisaka H, Kisaka M, Kanno A, and Kameya T. 1998. Intergeneric somatic hybridization of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by protoplast fusion. Plant Cell Reports 17: 362-367.
  • Kruse A. 1973. Hordeum x Triticum hybrids. Hereditas 73: 157-161.
  • Levan A, Fredga K, and Sundberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201- 220.
  • Lim KB, Chung JD, Van Kronenburg BCE, and Ramanna MS. 2000. Introgression of Lilium rubellum Baker chromosomes into L. longiflorum Thunb.: A genome painting study of the F1 hybrid, BC1 and BC2 progenies. Chromosome Research 8: 119-125.
  • Lim KB, Wennekes J, De Jong JH, Jacobsen E, and Van Tuyl JM. 2001. Karyotype analysis of Lilium rubellum and Lilium longiflorum by chromosome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genome 44: 911-918.
  • Maluszynska J. 1995. Hybrydyzacja kwasów nukleinowych in situ od ISH do DIRVISH. Biotechnologia 2: 92-101.
  • Marasek A, and Orlikowska T. 2001. Identyfikacja mieszańców oddalonych lilii w oparciu na markerach chromosomowych. Biotechnologia 3: 243-248.
  • Matern B, and Simak M. 1968. Statistical problems in karyotype analysis. Hereditas 59: 280-288.
  • Merker A. 1973. Identification of aneuploids in a line of hexaploid Triticale. Hereditas 74: 1-6.
  • Narain P, and Khoshoo TN. 1968. Cytogenetic survey of Amaryllis cultivars. Journal of Cytology and Genetics 3: 41-45.
  • Nassar NMA, Vieira MA, Vieira C, and Grattapaglia D. 1998. A molecular and embryonic study of apomixis in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Euphytica 102: 9-13.
  • North C, and Wills AB. 1969. Inter-specific hybrids of Lilium lankongense Franchet produced by embryo-culture. Euphytica 18: 430-434.
  • Obata Y, Niimi Y, Nakano M, Okazaki K, and Miyajima I. 2000. Interspecific hybrids between Lilium nobilissimum and L. regale produced via ovules-with-placenta-tissue culture. Scientia Horticulturae 84: 191-204.
  • Okazaki K, Asano Y, and Oosawa K. 1994. Interspecific hybrids between Lilium ‘Oriental’ hybrid and L. ‘Asiatic’ hybrid produced by embryo culture with revised media. Breeding Science 44: 59-64.
  • Ran Y, Murray BG, and Hammett KRW. 1999. Karyotype analysis of the genus Clivia by Giemsa and fluorochrome banding and in situ hybridization. Euphytica 106: 139-147.
  • Roh MS, Griesbach RJ, Gross KC, and Line M. 1996. Identification and evaluation of the interspecific hybrid of Lilium longiflorum and L. callosum. Acta Horticulturae 414: 111-124.
  • Rustanius P, Hang A, Hughes HG, and Tsuchiya T. 1991. Chromosome analysis of Alstroemeria ligtu hybrids. HortScience 26: 902-904.
  • Schweizer D. 1980. Fluorescent chromosome banding in plants: application, mechanism, and implication for chromosome structure. In: Davies DR, and Hopwood DA [ed.], The plant genome, 61-72. The John Innes Charity, John Innes Institute, Norwich, England.
  • Skarzhinshaya M, Fahleson J, Glimelius K, and Mouras A. 1998. Genome organization of Brassica napus and Lesquerella fendleri and analysis of their somatic hybrids using genomic in situ hybridization. Genome 41: 691-701.
  • Smyth DR, and Kongsuwan K. 1980. C-banding in Lily chromosomes, and their use in identification of hybrids. The Lily Yearbook NALS 33: 83-86.
  • Smyth DR, Kongsuwan K, and Wisudharomn S. 1991. A survey of C-band patterns in chromosomes of Lilium (Liliaceae). The Lily Yearbook NALS 44: 107-118.
  • Smyth DR, Kongsuwan K, and Wisudharomn S. 1989. A survey of C-band patterns in chromosomes of Lilium (Liliaceae). Plant Systematic and Evolution 163: 53-69.
  • Stace CA. 2000. Cytology and cytogenetics as a fundamental taxonomic resource for the 20th and 21st centuries. Taxon 49: 451-477.
  • Stewart RN. 1947. The morphology of somatic chromosomes in Lilium. American Journal of Botany 34: 9-26.
  • Sybenga J. 1959. Some source of error in the determination of chromosome length. Chromosoma 10: 355-364.
  • Uhring J. 1968. Hybridizing experiments with Lilium x ‘Black Beauty.’ The Lily Yearbook NALS 21: 44-52.
  • Withers RM. 1967. Liliums in Australia. The Australian Lilium Society. Stockland Press Pty. Ltd., Melbourne. Australia.
  • Wolters AM, Jacobsen E, O’Connell M, Bonnerna G, Ramulu KS, De Jong H, Schoenmakers H, Wijbrandi J, and Koornneef M. 1994. Somatic hybridization as a tool for tomato breeding. Euphytica 79: 265-277.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-7cd9aeab-c984-4408-830a-1a0621e9e591
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.