The spinal trigeminal nucleus - considerations on the structure of the nucleus caudalis

• Autorzy: Rusu M C
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The caudal part (nucleus caudalis) of the spinal trigeminal nucleus is considered to be the site of the second order neurons of the nociceptive pathways of the face. Recent studies have supported the co-participation in these circuits of the oral part of the same nucleus (nucleus oralis). The aims of the present study are: 1) to determine the morphology of the nucleus caudalis in human preparates; 2) to consider whether there is any structural basis for the pathways of signal transmission observed in animal experiments; 3) to provide evidence-based support for further consideration on the orofacial pathways. The studies were made using the Bielschowsky silver staining technique (on blocks) applied to drawn pieces of brainstems from human cadavers. On the sections the outer laminae of the nucleus are distinguishable, while the inner part hardly exposes any laminar configuration on transverse cuts. A marginal plexus with small polygonal or rounded small cells appears configured in 3 parts, namely dorsal, intermediate and ventral. Outer to the marginal plexus a clear band marks it off from the interstitial plexus, which appears more delicate. Within the marginal plexus is substantia gelatinosa with rare randomly distributed small or medium-sized cells. The inner magnocellular layers consist of clusters of small cells specifically allocated to fibre bundles, isolated small cells and large cells, pear-shaped or fusiform, appearing either bipolar or multipolar. The marginal and interstitial plexuses can represent the framework for modulation and vertical signal transmission within the spinal trigeminal nucleus, while the magnocellular layers seem to be mainly responsible for contralateral projection. It seems that the outer laminae of the spinal trigeminal nucleus may represent the receiver and the inner laminae the transmitter of the signal on the trigeminal pathway at brainstem level.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

structure; man; spinal trigeminal nucleus; morphology; nucleus; nucleus caudalis; brain stem

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 63
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.325-328,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Rusu M C

• University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania

Bibliografia

• 1. Bereiter DA, Hirata H, Hu JD (2000) Trigeminal subnucleus caudalis: beyond homologies with the spinal dorsal horn. Pain, 88: 221–224.
• 2. Cajal RS (1911) Histologie du Systeme nerveux de l’homme et des vertebres. Tome II, A.Maloine Editeur, Paris 864–868
• 3. Carpenter MB (1985) Core text of neuroanatomy. 3rd Ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore USA 108–109.
• 4. Chen Yu C, Hu B, Hu JW, Dostrovsky JO, Sessle BJ (2002) Central sensitization of nociceptive neurons in trigeminal subnucleus oralis depends on integrity of subnucleus caudalis. J Neurophysiol, 88: 256–264.
• 5. Dallel R, Duale C, Molat J-L (1998) Morphine administered in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis inhibits nociceptive activities in the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis. J Neurosci, 18: 3529–3536.
• 6. Dallel R, Villanueva L, Woda A, Voisin D (2003) Neurobiologie de la douleur trigeminale. Medecine/Sciences, 19: 67–74.
• 7. Falls WM (1984) The morphology of neurons in trigeminal nucleus oralis projecting to the medullary dorsal horn (trigeminal nucleus caudalis): a retrograde horseradish peroxidase and Golgi study. Neuroscience, 13: 1279–1298.
• 8. Gobel S, Falls WM, Hockfield S (1977) The division of the dorsal and ventral horns of the mammalian caudal medulla into eight layers using anatomical criteria. In: Pain in the trigeminal region: proceedings of a symposium held in the Department of Physiology, University of Bristol, England, on 25–27 July, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, New York 443–453.
• 9. Hockfield S, Gobel S (1982) An anatomical demonstration of projections to the medullary dorsal horn (trigeminal nucleus caudalis) from rostral trigeminal nuclei and the contralateral caudal medulla. Brain Res, 252: 203–211.
• 10. Luccarini P, Cadet R, Duale C, Woda A (1998) Effects of lesions in the trigeminal oralis and caudalis subnuclei on different orofacial nociceptive responses in the rat. Brain Res, 803: 79–85.
• 11. Phelan KD, Falls WM (1989) The interstitial system of the spinal trigeminal tract in the rat: anatomical evidence for morphological and functional heterogeneity. Somatosens Mot Res, 6: 367–399.
• 12. Phelan KD, Falls WM (1991) The spinotrigeminal pathway and its spatial relationship to the origin of trigeminospinal projections in the rat. Neuroscience, 40: 477–496.
• 13. Sessle BJ (2000) Acute and chronic craniofacial pain: brainstem mechanisms of nociceptive transmission and neuroplasticity, and their clinical correlates. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 11: 57–91.