Effect of young midfield shelterbelts development on species richness of macrofungi communities and their functional structure

• Autorzy: Kujawa A , Kujawa K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to recognize features characterizing development of macrofungi communities occurring in afforestations planted in crop fields and to evaluate the role of these habitats in conservation of macrofungi and preserve high species richness. The study was carried out in 1998–2006 and covered four shelterbelts (planted in 1993–1996) located in the area of the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park (western part of Poland). The shelterbelts were colonized by macrofungi just after planting. During first years of their growth a total of 174 species were recorded. Species composition changed significantly between initial (1998–2000) and final (2004–2006) period of study. Similarity of macrofungi communities (expressed as the Sorensen’s index) between these two periods in studied shelterbelts ranged between 37 and 46%. In spite of high similarity in tree species composition between studied afforestations (69–80%), the communities of macrofungi differed strongly between these sampling plots (Sorensen’s index was equal to about 40%). Pattern of changes in percentage share of functional groups, i.e. parasitic, mycorrhizal and saprotrophs (humicolous, lignicolous, litterinhibiting and muscicolous ones) in individual afforestations was different but the diversity of the communities measured with the Shannon- Weaver H’ index on the basis of share of functional groups tended to increase with ageing of afforestations. On average, the share of fungi growing on soil (ectomycorrhizal and humicolous saprotrophic species) was highest among all distinguished groups. Species composition of particular functional group was changing during the study period. A species representing new groups (lignicolous saprotrophs and parasites) were appearing in some shelterbelts in successive years. There were recorded some species rare in Poland, eg. Psilocybe (Stropharia) melanosperma (Bull. ex Pers.: Fr.) Noordel., Clavariadelphus fistulosus (Holmsk.: Fr.) Corner, Thelephora caryophyllea (Schaeff.): Fr., Agrocybe arvalis (Fr.) Singer, Galerina clavata (Velen.) Kuhner, Lachnella alboviolascens (Alb. & Schwein.: Fr.) Fr., Macrocystidia cucumis f. minor Joss, Mycena amicta (Fr.) Quel., Psilocybe (Stropharia) inuncta (Fr.: Fr.) Noordel., Trichophaea gregaria (Rehm) Boud. and Typhula filata (Pers.) Herter. Occurrence of rare and threatened species in young shelterbelts indicates that such afforestations, planted in crop fields but not treated by agricultural practices, contribute to the protection of species richness of macrofungi associated with tree communities and they are important substitute habitats for many species.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

macrofungi community; biodiversity; development; functional group; functional structure; species richness; agricultural landscape; shelter belt

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: 56
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.45-56,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kujawa A

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Field Station, Szkolna 4, Turew, 64-000 Koscian, Poland

autor

Kujawa K.

Bibliografia

• Arnolds E. 1992a – Ecological studies on ectomycorrhizal fungi: an introduction – Giorn. Bot. Ital. 126: 765–778.
• Arnolds E. 1992b – The analysis and classification of fungal communities with special reference to macrofungi. (In: Fungi in Vegetation Science, Ed. W. Winterhoff) – Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 7–47.
• Bałazy S., Ziomek K., Weyssenhoff H., Wojcik A. 1998 – Zasady kształtowania zadrzewień środpolnych [Guildline for midfield afforestations management] (In: Kształtowanie środowiska rolniczego na przykładzie Parku Krajobrazowego im. Gen. D. Chłapowskiego [Management of agricultural habitat – a case from the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park] Eds. L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, pp. 49–65 (in Polish).
• Barczak T., Bennewicz J., Kaczorowski G. 2002 – Zarośla środpolne jako rezerwuar biorożnorodności afidofagow [Midfield bed as reservoir of aphidophages diversity] (In.: Wyspy środowiskowe. Biorożnorodność i proby typologii [Habitat islands. Biodiversity and and typology] Ed. J. Banaszak) – Wyd. Akademii Bydgoskiej, Bydgoszcz, pp. 127–155 (in Polish).
• Bernacki Z. 2004 – Secondary succession of the vegatation in the young shelterbelt (Turew area, Western Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 391–404.
• Dice L.R. 1945 – Measures of the amount of ecological association between species – Ecology 26: 297–302.
• Dix N.J., Webster J. 1995 – Fungal ecology – Chapman & Hall, London, 549 pp. Friedrich S. 2000 – Ocena metody zastosowanej w badaniach mikologicznych zbiorowisk leśnych Cedyńskiego Parku Krajobrazowego [Evaluation of method used for mycological study of forest communities in the Cedyński Landscape Park] – Folia Univ. Agric. Steti. 213 Agricultura (85): 95–104 (in Polish).
• Friedrich S. 2001 – Macromycetes diversity of pine-tree plantings on a post-fire forest site in Notecka Forest (NW Poland) – Acta Mycol. 36: 127–148.
• Hintikka V. 1988 – On the macromycetes flora in oligotrophic pine forests of different ages in South Finland – Acta Bot. Fenn. 136: 89–94.
• Kajak A., Oleszczuk M. 2004 – Effect of shelterbelts on adjoining cultivated fields: Patrolling intensity of carabid beetles (Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 155–172.
• Kałucka I. 2001 – Sukcesja Macromycetes na gruntach porolnych w zbiorowiskach pochodzenia naturalnego i sztucznego. [Succession of Macromycetes in abandoned farmland in the forest communities of natural and artificial origin] (In: Botanika w dobie biologii molekularnej. Materiały sesji i sympozjow 52 Zjazdu Polskiego Towarzystwa Botanicznego [Botany in time of molecular biology. Proceedings from 52 Congress of Polish Botanical Society] Ed. E. Zenkteler, pp. 181.
• Karg J. 1999 – Nowe zadrzewienie w Parku Krajobrazowym im. Gen. D. Chłapowskiego. Rozwoj i funkcje [A new afforestation in the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park. Development and functions] – Biul. Parkow Krajobr. Wielkop. 5(7): 102–120 (in Polish).
• Karg J. 2004 – Importance of midfield shelterbelts for over-wintering entomofauna (Turew area, West Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 421–431.
• Karg J., Kajak A., Ryszkowski L. 2003 – Impact of young shelterbelts on organic matter content and development of microbial and faunal communities of adjacent fields – Pol. J. Ecol. 51: 283–290.
• Karg J., Karlik B. 1993 – Zadrzewienia na obszarach wiejskich [Afforestations in rural areas] – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, 45 pp. (in Polish).
• Karg J., Ryszkowski L. 1996 – Wpływ struktury krajobrazu rolniczego na biorożnorodność i procesy regulacji biocenotycznej [Effect of agricultural landscape structure on biodiversity and processes of biocenotic regulation] (In: Ekologiczne procesy na obszarach intensywnego rolnictwa [Ecological processes in the areas with intensive agriculture] Eds. L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, pp. 21–31 (in Polish).
• Keizer P.J. 1993 – General introduction (In: The ecology of macromycetes in roadside verges planted with trees. PhD thesis) – Agricultural University, Wageningen: 9–18 pp.
• Keizer P.J., Arnolds E. 1993 – Succession of ectomycorrhizal fungi in roadside verges planted with Common Oak (Quercus robur L.) in Drenthe, the Netherlands. (In: The ecology of macromycetes in roadside verges planted with trees. PhD thesis) – Agricultural University, Wageningen, pp. 129–149.
• Keizer P.J., Arnolds E. 1994 – Succession of ectomycorrhizal fungi in roadside verges planted with Common Oak (Quercus robur L.) in Drenthe, the Netherlands – Mycorrhiza, 4: 147–159.
• Kujawa A. 1998 – Zadrzewienia na terenie Parku Krajobrazowego im. gen. D. Chłapowskiego. Stan i koncepcja uzupełniania sieci zadrzewień [Afforestations in the area of the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park. Present status and a conception of afforestation network completing] (In: Kształtowanie środowiska rolniczego na przykładzie Parku Krajobrazowego im. gen. D. Chłapowskiego [Management of agricultural habitat – a case from the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park] Eds. L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, pp. 41–48 (in Polish)..
• Kujawa K. 2004 – Importance of young shelterbelts for breeding avifauna in agricultural landscape (Turew area, West Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol., 52: 433–443.
• Last F.T., Mason P.A., Ingleby K., Fleming L.V. 1984 – Succession of fruit bodies of sheathing mycorrhizal fungi associated with Betula pendula – Forest Ecol. Manag. 9: 229–234.
• Lisiewska M., Strakulska M. 2002 – Biodiversity of macrofungi of selected field afforestation in the Agroecological Landscape Park near Turew (Central Wielkopolska) – Pol. Bot. J. 47: 167–181.
• Łęcki R. 2004 – Small mammals in two midfield shelterbelts of different age – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 455–459.
• Makulec G. 2004 – Lumbricidae communities in several years old midfield shelterbelt (Turew region, Western Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 173–180.
• Marcinek J. 1996 – Soils of the Turew agricultural landscape (In: Dynamics of an agricultural landscape, Eds. L. Ryszkowski, N.R. French, A. Kędziora) – PWRiL, Warszawa, pp. 19–26.
• Mason P.A., Last F.T., Pelham J., Ingleby K. 1982 – Ecology of some fungi associated with an ageing stand of Birches (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) – For. Ecol. Manag. 4: 19–39.
• Nowak E. 2004 – Enchytraeids (Oligochaeta) in the agricultural landscape – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 115–122.
• Olechowicz E. 2004 – Soil-litter macrofauna in the mixed forest and midfield shelterbelts of different age (Turew area, West Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 405–419.
• Olejniczak I. 2004 – Community structure of soil-litter macrofauna in shelterbelt and adjacent crop field – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 123–134.
• Orłoś H. 1966 – Grzyby leśne na tle środowiska [Forest fungi and their habitat] – PWRiL, Warszawa, 228 pp. (in Polish).Pullin A.S. 2005 – Biologiczne podstawy ochrony przyrody [Biological background of nature conservation] – Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa, 393 pp. (in Polish).
• Ratyńska H. 2002 – Wyspy środowiskowe jako element krajobrazu, proba typologii i zrożnicowanie szaty roslinnej [Habitat islands as an element of landscape, proposal of typology and vegetation cover diversity] (In: Wyspy środowiskowe. Biorożnorodność I proby typologii [Habitat islands. Biodiversity and and typology] Ed. J. Banaszak) – Wyd. Akademii Bydgoskiej, Bydgoszcz, pp. 239–260 (in Polish).
• Rudawska M. (Ed.) 2000 – Ektomikoryza. Jej znaczenie i zastosowanie w leśnictwie [Ectomycorrhiza. Its importance and applying in forestry] – Instytut Dendrologii PAN, Kornik, 102 pp. (in Polish).
• Ryszkowski L. 1998 – Integracja rolnictwa z ochroną przyrody [Integration of agriculture with nature conservation] (In: Kształtowanie środowiska rolniczego na przykładzie Parku Krajobrazowego im. gen. D. Chłapowskiego [Management of agricultural habitat – a case from the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park] Eds. L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, pp. 149–157(in Polish).
• Ryszkowski L. 2001 – Trwały i zrownoważony rozwoj obszarow wiejskiech a parki krajobrazowe [Importance of landscape parks for sustainable development of rural areas] (In: Ochrona parkow krajobrazowych a działalność gospodarcza [Protection of landscape parks vs. business activity] Eds. L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, pp. 141–147 (in Polish).
• Ryszkowski L., Bałazy S. 1991 – Strategia ochrony żywych zasobow przyrody w Polsce [Strategy for protection of living resources of nature in Poland] – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, 95 pp. (in Polish).
• Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Bernacki Z. 2003 – Biocenotic function of the mid-field woodlots in West Poland: Study area and research assumption – Pol. J. Ecol. 51: 269–281.
• Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Kujawa K. 1999 – Ochrona i kształtowanie rożnorodności biologicznej w krajobrazie rolniczym [Conservation and managament of biodiversity in an agricultural landscape] (In: Uwarunkowania ochrony rożnorodności biologicznej i krajobrazowej [Conditionings of biological and landscape diversity] Eds. L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – Zakład Badań Środowiska Rolni-czego i Leśnego PAN, Poznań, pp. 59–80 (in Polish).
• Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Kujawa K., Gołdyn H., Arczyńska-Chudy E. 2002. Influence of landscape Mosaic Structures on Diversity of Wild Plant and Animal Communities in Agricultural Landscapes of Poland (In: Landscape Ecology in Agroecosystems Management, Ed. L. Ryszkowski) – CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 185–217.
• Shaw P.J.A., Kibby G., Mayes J. 2002 – Effect of thinning treatment on an ectomycorrhizal succession under Scots pine – Mycol. Res. 107: 317–328.
• Sobczyk D. 2004 – Butterflies (Lepidoptera) of young migfield shelterbelts – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 449–453.
• Strakulska M. 2001 – Grzyby wielkoowocnikowe w wybranych zadrzewieniach środpolnych Agroekologicznego Parku Krajobrazowego im. gen. D. Chłapowskiego w Turwi [Macrofungi of a midfield afforestations in the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park] – M. Sc. thesis, Dept. of Plant Ecology and Environment Protection, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, 60 pp. (in Polish).
• Szanser M. 2003 – The effect of shelterbelts on litter decomposition and fauna of adjacent fields: in situ experiment – Pol. J. Ecol. 51: 309–321.
• Szeflińska D. 2004 – Thysanoptera community of midfield shelterbelts of different age – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 445–448.Termorshuizen A.J. 1991 – Succession of mycorrhizal fungi in stands of Pinus sylvestris in the Netherlands – J. Veg. Sci. 2: 555–564.
• Tomiałojć L. 1974 – Charakterystyka ilościowa lęgowej i zimowej awifauny lasow okolic Legnicy (Dolny Śląsk) [Quantitative characteristics of the breeding and winter avifauna of forests near Legnica, Lower Silesia] – Acta Orn. 14: 59–97 (in Polish).
• Wasilewska L. 2004 – Nematofauna of the shelterbelts in the agricultural landscape – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 99–114.
• Wojewoda D., Russel S. 2003 – The impact of a shelterbelt on soil properties and microbiological activity in an adjacent crop field – Pol. J. Ecol. 51: 291–307.
• Wojewoda W. 2003 – Checklist of Polish larger Basidiomycetes (In: Biodiversity of Poland. Vol. 7, Ed. Z. Mirek) – W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences. Krakow, 812 pp.
• Wojewoda W., Ławrynowicz M. 2006 – Red list of the macrofungi in Poland (In: Red list of plants and fungi in Poland, Eds. Z. Mirek, K. Zarzycki, W. Wojewoda, Z. Szeląg) – W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, pp. 53–70.
• Zajączkowski K. 2005 – Regionalizacja potrzeb zadrzewieniowych w Polsce [Regionalization of needs for afforestations introduction in Poland] – Prace IBL. Rozprawy i monografie, 4, Warszawa, 127 pp. (in Polish).al