Mycorrhizal status of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings grown in watered and non-watered nursery condition

• Autorzy: Hilszczanska D
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study describes the effect of watering on the mycorrhizal development and growth of Scots pine seedlings in a bare root nursery. Seedlings of Scots pine, grown under nursery conditions on natural soil (loamy sand) and soil + litter, were subjected to two different watering regimes for five months. During this time, measurements of soil water potential were made. Seedlings grown in natural soil and subjected to drought conditions were of significantly greater shoot height and volume and they had one mycorrhizal morphotype more than watered seedlings. However, irrigated seedlings subjected to excessive watering possessed greater mycorrhizal colonization: 46% on natural soil and 72% on soil + litter, while non-irrigated seedlings had 36% and 67% levels of mycorrhizal colonization, respectively.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Scots pine zob.Scotch pine; Scotch pine; Pinus sylvestris; mycorrhizal status; watering effect; plant growth; plant development; tree; soil water potential; moisture condition

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Dendrobiology
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 52
• Opis fizyczny: p.23-28,fig.,ref

Twórcy

autor

Hilszczanska D

• Forest Research Institute, Sekocin, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• Agerer R. 1987–1997. Colour Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae. Einhorn-Verlag, Schwäbisch-Gmünd., Germany.
• Agerer R. 2001. Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza 11 (2): 107–114.
• Baar J., de Vries F.W. 1995. Effects of manipulation of litter and humus layers on ectomycorrhizal colonization potential in Scots pine stands of different age. Mycorrhiza 5: 267–272.
• Bending G.D., Read D.J. 1995. The structure and function of the vegetative mycelium of ectomycorrhizal plants. V. Foraging behaviour and translocation of nutrients from exploited organic matter. New Phytologist 130: 401–409.
• Brogowski Z., Czerwiński Z. 1995. Materiały do ćwiczeń z gleboznawstwa. Część II. Warszawa, SGGW [In Polish].
• Coutts M.P., Nicoll B.C. 1990. Waterlloging tolerance of roots of Sitka spruce clones and of strands from Thelephora terrestris mycorrhizas. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 1894–1899.
• Coleman M.D., Bledsoe C.S., Lopushinsky W. 1989. Pure culture of ectomycorrhizal fungi to imposed water stress. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 29–39.
• Danielson R.M., Visser S. 1990. The mycorrhizal and nodulation status of container-grown trees and shrubs reared in commercial nurseries. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 609–614.
• Dell B., Malajczuk N., Bougher N.L., Thomson G. 1994. Development and function of Pisolithus and Scleroderma ectomycorrhizas formed in vitro with Allocasuarina, Casuarina and Eucalyptus. Mycorrhiza 5: 129–138.
• Dighton J., Mason P.A. 1985. Mycorrhizal dynamics during forest tree development. In: Moore D., Casselton L.A., Wood D.A., Frankland, J.C. (ed.): Devlopment Biology of Higher Fungi. pp. 117–139. British My. Soc. Symp. 10. Cambridge University Press.
• Garbaye J., Churin J.L. 1997. Growth stimulation of young oak plantations inoculated with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus with special reference to summer drought. Forest Ecology and Management 98: 221–228.
• Guehl J.M., Garbaye J. 1990. The effects of ectomycorrhizal status on carbon dioxide assimilation capacity, water-use efficiency and response to transplanting in seedlings of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) Franco. Annales des Sciences Forestieres 21: 335–334.
• Ingleby K., Mason P.A., Last F.T., Fleming L.V. 1990. Identification of ectomycorrhizas. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. Research Publication no.5.
• Laiho O. 1988. The structure of mycorrhiza and mycorrhizal fungi in forests soil and nurseries. Karstenia 28: 63–64.
• Lehto T. 1989. Mycorrhizal status of Scots pine nursery stock in Finland. Folia Forestalia 726: 1–15.
• Malicki M.A., Plagge R., Roth C.H. 1996. Improving the calibration of dielectric TDR soil moisture determination taking into account the solid soil. European Journal of Soil Science 47: 357–366.
• Marx D., Cordell C.E. 1989. The use of specific ectomycorrhizas to improve artificial forestation practices. In: Biotechnology of fungi for improving plant growth. Symposium of the British Mycological Society, Sussex, September 1988. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.
• Marx D.H. 1991. The practical significance of ectomycorrhizae in forest establishment. In: Ecophysiology of ectomycorrhizae of forest trees. The Marcus Wallenberg Found. Symp. Proceed., 7: 54–90.
• Molina R., Massicote H., Trappe J. M. 1992. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community- ecological conseqences and practical implications. In: Allen MJ (ed) Mycorrhizal functioning. An integrative plant-fungal process. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 357–423.
• Parlade J., Alvarez I.F., Pera J. 1996. Inoculation of containerized Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus pinaster seedlings with spores of five species of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 6: 237–245.
• Perry D.A., Margolis H., Choquette C., Molina R., Trappe J.M. 1989. Ectomycorrhizal mediation of competition between coniferous tree species. New Phytologist 112: 501–511.
• Piggot C.D. 1982. Survival of mycorrhiza formed by Cenococcum geophilum Fr. In dry soils. New Phytologist 92: 513–517.
• Rayner A.D.M., Boddy L. 1988. Fungal Decomposition of wood: Its Biology and Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
• Rosenzweig M.L., Abramsky Z. 1993. How are diversity and productivity related? –In: Species diversity in ecological communities. Edited by R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schulter. III pp. 52–65 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Rudawska M., Leski T., Gornowicz R. 2001. Mycorrhizal status of Pinus sylvestris nursery stock in Poland as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Dendrobiology, vol. 46: 49–58.
• Smith S.E., Read D.J. 1997. Ectomycorrhizas: structure and development of ectomycorrhizal roots. In: Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Second Edition, Academic Press, pp. 163–232.
• Stenström E., Ek M. 1990. Field growth of Pinus sylvestris following nursery inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 914–918.
• Stenström E. 1991.The effects of flooding on the formation of ectomycorrhizae in Pinus sylvestris seedlings. Plant and Soil 131: 247–250.
• Thomson B.D., Grove T.S., Malajczuk N., Hardy G.E.S. 1994. The effectiveness of ectomycorrhizal fungi increasing the growth of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. in relation to root colonization and hyphal development in soil. New Phytologist 126: 517–524.
• Trappe J.M. 1962. Cennococcum graniforme-its distribution, ecology, mycorrhiza andinherent variation. PhD Diss. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
• Tymińska A., Le Tacon F., Bouchard D. 1986. Effect of three ectomycorrhizal fungi on growth and phosphors uptake in Pius sylvestris seedlings at increasing phosphors levels. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 2753–2757.
• Unestam T., Sun Y.P. 1995. Extramatrical structures of hydrophobic and hydrophilic ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 5: 301–311.
• Villeneuve N., Le Tacon F., Bouchard D. 1991. Survival of inoculated Laccaria bicolor in competition with native ectomycorrhizal fungi and effects on the growth of outplanted Douglas-fir seedlings. Plant and Soil 135: 95–107.
• Whalley W.R. 1993. Consideration on the use of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content. Journal of Soil Science 44: 1–9.
• Worley J.F., Hacskaylo E. 1959. The effect of available soil moisture on the mycorrhizal association of Virginia pine. Forest Science: 267–268.
• Wytyczne stosowania deszczowni w szkółkach leśnych i zadrzewieniowych, 1991. Lasy Państwowe, Naczelny Zarząd LP, Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, Warszawa [In Polish].