FISH and GISH analysis of Brassica genomes

• Autorzy: Hasterok R , Ksiazczyk T. , Wolny E. , Maluszynska J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Fluorescence and genomic in situ hybridization (FISH and GISH) methods were used for discrimination of Brassica genomes. The three diploid and three allotetraploid species of Brassica, known as the "U-triangle," represent an attractive model for molecular and cytologieal analysis of genome changes during phylogeny in the genus Brassica. The use of genomic DNA probes enabled unambiguous discrimination of the ancestral genomes in B. juncea and B. carinata, and was only partially successful in B. napus. GISH signals in all genomes were localized predominantly in pericentromeric regions of chromosomes. Simultaneous application of genomic and ribosomal DNA probes in multicolor GISH and FISH allowed identification of a significant number of chromosomes in the B. juncea complement. The study also revealed that species of Brassica possess Arabidopsis-type telomeric repeats which in all genomes occupied exclusively terminal, that is, telomeric, locations of chromosomes.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

genomic in situ hybridization; analysis; fluorescent in situ hybridization; 25S rDNA probe; telomere; fluorescence in situ hybridization; genome; 5S rDNA probe; GISH method; Brassica

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 47
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.185-192,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hasterok R

• University of Silesia, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland

autor

Ksiazczyk T.

autor

Wolny E.

autor

Maluszynska J.

Bibliografia

• Benabdelmouna A, Shi Y, Abirached-Darmency M, and Darmency H. 2001. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) discriminates between the A and the B genomes in diploid and tetraploid Setaria species. Genome 44: 685-690.
• D’Hont A, Paget-Goy A, Escoute J, and Carreel F. 2000. The interspecific genome structure of cultivated banana, Musa spp. revealed by genomic DNA in situ hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 177-183.
• Gavrilenko T, Thieme R, and Rokka VM. 2001. Cytogenetic analysis of Lycopersicon esculentum (+) Solanum etuberosum somatic hybrids and their androgenetic regenerants. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 231-239.
• Gerlach WL, and Dyer TA. 1980. Sequence organization of the repeating units in the nucleus of wheat which contain 5S rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Research 8: 4851-4865.
• Hajdera I, Siwinska D, Hasterok R, and Maluszynska J. 2003. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of genome structure in Lupinus angustifolius and Lupinus cosentinii. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 988-996.
• Harrison GE, and Heslop-Harrison JS. 1995. Centromeric repetitive DNA sequences in the genus Brassica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90: 157-165.
• Hasterok R, and Maluszynska J. 2000a. Cytogenetic analysis of diploid Brassica species. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 42: 145-163.
• Hasterok R, and Maluszynska J. 2000b. Cytogenetic markers of Brassica napus chromosomes. Journal of Applied Genetics 41: 1-9.
• Hasterok R, and Maluszynska J. 2000c. Nucleolar dominance does not occur in root tip cells of allotetraploid Brassica species. Genome 43: 574-579.
• Hasterok R, Jenkins G, and Draper J. 2004. Laying the cytotaxonomic foundations of a new model grass, Brachypodium distachyon (L.) Beauv. Chromosome Research 12: 397-403.
• Hasterok R, Jenkins G, Langdon T, Jones RN, and Maluszynska J. 2001. Ribosomal DNA is an effective marker of Brassica chromosomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 486-490.
• Howell EC, Barker GC, Jones GH, Kearsey MJ, King GJ, Kop EP, Ryder CD, Teakle GR, Vicente JG, and Armstrong SJ. 2002. Integration of the cytogenetic and genetic linkage maps of Brassica oleracea. Genetics 161: 1225-1234.
• Iqbal N, Reader SM, Caligari PDS, and Miller TE. 2000. Characterization of Aegilops uniaristata chromosomes by comparative DNA marker analysis and repetitive DNA sequence in situ hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 1173-1179.
• Lagercrantz U, and Lydiate DJ. 1996. Comparative genome mapping in Brassica. Genetics 144: 1903-1910.
• Li CB, Zhang DM, Ge S, Lu BR, and Hong DY. 2001. Identification of genome constitution of Oryza malampuzhaensis, O. minuta, and O. punctata by multicolour genomic in situ hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 204- 211.
• Lysak MA, Pecinka A, and Schubert I. 2003. Recent progress in chromosome painting of Arabidopsis and related species. Chromosome Research 11: 195-204.
• Maluszynska J, and Hasterok R. 2005. Identification of individual chromosomes and parental genomes in Brassica juncea using GISH and FISH. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 109: 310-314.
• Maluszynska J, Juchimiuk J, and Wolny E. 2003. Chromosomal aberrations in Crepis capillaris cells detected by FISH. Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica 41: 101-104.
• Marasek A, Hasterok R, Wiejacha K, and Orlikowska T. 2004. Determination by GISH and FISH of hybrid status in Lilium. Hereditas 140: 1-7.
• Morgan WG, King IP, Koch S, Harper JA, and Thomas HM. 2001. Introgression of chromosomes of Festuca arundinacea var. glaucescens into Lolium multiflorum revealed by genomic in situ hybridisation (GISH). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 696-701.
• Murray MG, and Thompson WF. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 8: 4321-4325.
• Pasakinskiene I, and Jones N. 2005. A decade of "chromosome painting" in Lolium and Festuca. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 109: 393-399.
• Pecinka A, Schubert V, Meister A, Kreth G, Klatte M, Lysak MA, Fuchs J, and Schubert I. 2004. Chromosome territory arrangement and homologous pairing in nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana are predominantly random except for NOR-bearing chromosomes. Chromosoma 113: 258-269.
• Quiros CF. 1995. Hypothetical model for Brassica genome structure and evolution. In: Ninth International Rapeseed Congress: Rapeseed Today and Tomorrow, Cambridge, UK: 1063-1065.
• Richards EJ, Chao S, Vongs A, and Yang J. 1992. Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana telomeres isolated in yeast. Nucleic Acids Research 20: 4039-4046.
• Schelfhout CJ, Snowdon R, Cowling WA, and Wroth JM. 2004. A PCR based B-genome-specific marker in Brassica species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 917-921.
• Schubert I. 1992. Telomeric polymorphism in Vicia faba. Zentralblatt für Biologische Aerosolforschung 111: 164-168.
• Schwarzacher T, and Heslop-Harrison JS. 1991. In situ hybridisation to plant telomeres using synthetic oligomers. Genome 34: 317-323.
• Schwarzacher T, and Heslop-Harrison JS. 2000. Practical in situ hybridization. BIOS Scientific Limited.
• Shi F, and Endo TR. 2000. Genetic induction of chromosomal rearrangements in barley chromosome 7H added to common wheat. Chromosoma 109: 358-363.
• Shibata F, and Hizume M. 2002. The identification and analysis of the sequences that allow the detection of Allium cepa chromosomes by GISH in the allodiploid A. wakegi. Chromosoma 111: 184-191.
• Snowdon RJ, Köhler W, Friedt W, and Köhler A. 1997. Genomic in situ hybridization in Brassica amphidiploids and interspecific hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 1320-1324.
• Song KM, Osborn TC, and Williams PH. 1988. Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 75: 784-794.
• U N. 1935. Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japanese Journal of Botany 7: 389-453.
• Unfried I, and Gruendler P. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of the 5.8S and 25S rRNA genes and of the internal transcribed spacers from Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 4011.
• Warwick SI, and Black LD. 1993. Molecular relationships in subtribe Brassicinae (Cruciferae, tribe Brassiceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 906-918.