Fossil chaetognaths from the Burgess Shale: A reply to Conway Morris [2009]

• Autorzy: Szaniawski H
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Walcott (1911) erected the new genus and species Oesia disjuncta and assigned them to the polychaete annelids, based on a small collection of similar fossils from the famous Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. In 2002 I suggested that the species is “possibly related to chaetognaths” (Szaniawski 2002: 405). Later, after obtaining new photos of the specimens and making comparative investigations with the extant chaetognaths, I was able to describe many significant similarities, and came to the conclusion that O. disjuncta indeed is an ancestral chaetognath (Szaniawski 2005). This interpretation already has been accepted in several publications (Vannier et al. 2005; Ball and Miller 2006; Hu et al. 2007. Giribet 2008). Ball and Miller (2006: 594) confirmed not only its “... remarkable resemblance to modern chaetognaths” but also correctness of recognition of all its organs. They even reproduced a part of my illustration showing them (Ball and Miller 2006: fig. 2). Vannier et al. (2006: 629) combined the problem with the open question of the systematic position of another Burgess Shale fossil Amiskwia sagittiformis Walcott, 1911, and expressed their reservation based on “...the lack of clear evidence of a grasping apparatus...”. Only Conway Morris (2009) firmly disagreed with this diagnosis and even devoted a special “discussion” article addressing the issue. However, that article contains several ambiguities and misunderstandings which need clarification.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

paleontology; chaetognath; fossil; new genus; new species; Middle Cambrian; Chaetognatha; Oesia disjuncta; polychaete annelid; Cambrian; Amiskwia sagittiformis

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 54
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.361-364,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Szaniawski H

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• An, T.−X., Zhang, F., Xiang, W., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, H., Jiang, D., Yang, C., Lin, L., Cui, Z., and Yang, X. 1983. The Conodonts of North China and the Adjacent Regions. 223 pp. Science Press, Beijing.
• Andres, D. 1981. Beziehungen zwischen kambrischen Conodonten und Euconodonten [in German]. Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen A 32: 19–31.
• Andres, D. 1988. Struktur, Apparate und Phylogneie primitiver conodonten. Paläontographica A 200 (4–6): 1–105.
• Ball, E.E and Miller, D.J. 2006. The continuing classificatory conundrum of chaetognaths. Current Biology 16: R59–R596.
• Bengtson, S. 1976. The structure of some Middle Cambrian conodonts, and the early evolution of conodont structure and function. Lethaia 9: 185–206.
• Bergström, S.M. and Orchard, M.J. 1985. Conodonts of the Cambrian and Ordovician System from the British Isles. In: A.C. Higgins and R.L. Austin (eds.), A Stratigraphical Index of Conodonts, 32–67. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.
• Briggs, D.E.G. 1999. Molecular taphonomy of animal and plant cuticles: selective preservation and diagenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 354: 7–17.
• Chen, J.−Y. 2004. The Dawn of Animal World [in Chinese]. xii + 366 pp. Jiangsu Science and Technical Press, Nanjing.
• Chen, J.−Y. and Huang, D.−Y 2002. A possible Lower Cambrian chaetognath (arrow worm). Science 298: 187.
• Chen, L.−Z., Luo, H−L., Hu, S.−X., Yin, J.−Y., Jiang, Z.−W., Wu, Z.−L., Li, F., and Chen, A.−L. 2002. Early Cambrian Chengjiang Fauna in Eastern Yunnan, China [in Chinese]. 199 pp. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming.
• Conway Morris, S. 2009. The Burgess Shale animal Oesia disjuncta is not a chaetognath: A reply to Szaniawski (2002). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 (1): 175–179.
• Dubinina S.V. 2000. Konodonty i zonalnaâ stratigrafiâ pograničnych otloženij kembriâ i ordovika. 239 pp. Geologičeskij Institut, Rosijskaâ Akademiâ Nauk, Trudy, vypusk 517, Nauka, Moskva.
• Giribet, G. 2008. Assembling the lophotrochozoan (= spiralian) tree of life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 1513–1522.
• Hu, S.−X., Steiner, M., Zhu, M.−Y., Erdtmann, B.−D., Luo, H.−L., Chen, L.−Z., and Weber, B. 2007. Diverse pelagic predators from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte and the establishment of modern−style pelagic ecosystems in the early Cambrian. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 254: 307–316.
• Kuhl, W. 1938. Chaetognatha. In: H.G. Bronn (ed.), Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs Band IV Vermes. Abteilung IV, Buch 2, Teil 1, 1–226. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
• Miller, J.F. 1981. Superfamily Amphigeisinacea Miller, new. In: R.A. Robison (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W Miscellanea, Supplement 2 Conodonta, W11–W115. The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas.
• Miller, J.F. and Rushton, A.W.A. 1973. Natural conodont assemblages from the Upper Cambrian of Warwickshire, Great Britain. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs 5 (4): 337–338.
• Müller, K.J. 1959. Kambrische Conodonten. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellshaft 111: 424–485.
• Müller, K.J. and Andres, D. 1976. Eine Conodontengruppe von Prooneotodus tenuis (Muller) 1959 in Natürlichen Zusammenhang aus dem oberen Kambrium von Schweden. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift 50 (3/4): 193–200.
• Müller, K.J. and Hinz, I. 1991. Upper Cambrian conodonts from Sweden. Fossils and Strata 28: 1–153.
• Petrovich, R. 2001. Mechanisms of fossilization of the soft−bodied and lightly armored faunas of the Burgess Shale and of some other classical localities. American Journal of Science 301: 683–726.
• Repetski, J.E. and Szaniawski H. 1981. Paleobiologic interpretation of Cambrian and Earliest Ordovician conodont natural assemblages.In: M.E. Taylor (ed.), Short Papers for the 2nd International Symposium on the Cambrian System.US Geological Survey, Open−File Report 81−743: 169–172.
• Stankiewicz, B.A. Briggs, D.E.G., Evershed, R.P., Flannery, M.B., and Wuttke, M. 1997. Preservation of chitin in 25 million−year−old fossils. Science 276: 1541–1543.
• Szaniawski, H. 1980a. Conodonts from the Tremadocian Chalcedony beds, Holy Cross Mountains (Poland). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 25 (1): 101–121.
• Szaniawski, H. 1980b. Fused clusters of paraconodonts. In: H.P. Schönlaub (ed.), Abstracts for the 2nd European Conodont Symposium (ECOS II). Abhandlungen der Geologischen Landestalt Wien 35: 211.
• Szaniawski, H. 1982. Chaetognath grasping spies recognized among Cambrian protoconodonts. Journal of Paleontology 56 (3): 806–810.
• Szaniawski H. 2005. Cambrian chaetognaths recognized in Burgess Shale fossils. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 50 (1): 1–8.
• Vannier, J., Steiner, M., Renvoisé, E., Hu, S.−X., and Casanova, J.−P. 2005. Arrow worms: small marine predators from “deep time” Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 22 (Supplement): 189–190.
• Vannier, J., Steiner, M. Renvoisé, E., Hu, S.−X., and Casanova, J.−P. 2006. Early Cambrian origin of modern food webs: evidence from predator arrow worms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274: 627–633.
• Walcott, C.D. 1911. Middle Cambrian annelids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 57 (2): 109–144.