The reproduction of neon tetra, Paracheirodon innesi [Myers, 1936], under controlled conditions

• Autorzy: Kucharczyk D , Targonska K. , Zarski D. , Krejszeff S. , Kupren K. , Luczynski M.J. , Szczerbowski A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Rozrod neona innesa, Paracheirodon innesi [Myers, 1936], w warunkach kontrolowanych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A study on reproduction of neon tetra has been carried out under controlled conditions. Neon tetra is very popular aquarium fish. It was observed that spawners of this species produce viable gametes during a few (5–6) spawning periods only. From the breeding perspective fish of that species should be reproduced again shortly after the completed spawning and time between spawns should be 15 to 20 days. Keeping the fish between spawning periods more than 20 days results in a significant deterioration of quality of gametes, expressed by the decreased number of 12-day-old larvae. It was shown that before spawning spawners should be kept in water at 22℃. The negative effect of keeping the reproducers in water at 25℃ accumulated with time.

PL

Przeprowadzono badania nad rozrodem neona Innesa w warunkach kontrolowanych. Neon Innesa jest bardzo popularną rybą akwariową. Odnotowano, że od tarlaków tego gatunku jest możliwe uzyskanie dobrej jakości gamet podczas kilku (5–6) kolejnych tareł. Z hodowlanego punktu widzenia ryby powinno się rozmnażać krótko po skończonym rozrodzie, a kolejne tarła powinny odbywać się między 15 a 20 dniem. Przetrzymywanie ryb między kolejnymi tarłami dłużej niż 20 dni skutkuje znacznym obniżeniem jakości gamet, wyrażonej jako zmniejszona liczba 12-dniowych larw. Uzyskane wyniki wskazują, iż tarlaki między tarłami powinny być przetrzymywane w wodzie o temperaturze 22℃. Odnotowano nasilenie się negatywnego efektu przetrzymywania ryb w temperaturze 25℃.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.81-92,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kucharczyk D

• University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Targonska K.

autor

Zarski D.

autor

Krejszeff S.

autor

Kupren K.

autor

Luczynski M.J.

autor

Szczerbowski A.

Bibliografia

• BALON E.K. 2004. About the oldest domesticates among fishes. J. Fish Biol., 65 suppl. A: 1–27.
• BAYLEY P. B., PETRERE JR. M. 1989. Amazon fisheries: assessment methods, current status and management options. Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Ed. D.P. Dodge. Can. Fish. Aquat. Sci., Spec. Publ., 106: 385–398.
• BROOKS S., TYLER C.R., SUMPTEM J.P. 1997. Egg quality in fish: what makes a good egg? Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 7: 387–416.
• BRZUSKA E. 2000. Artificial spawning of carp Cyprinus carpio L.: differences between the effects on reproduction in females of Polish and Hungarian provenance treated with carp pituitary and (D-Ala⁶) GnRH ProNHEt (Kobarelin). Aquacult. Res., 31: 457–465.
• BRZUSKA E. 2005. Artificial spawning of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): differences between females of Polish strain 6 and Hungarian strain W treated with carp pituitary homogenate, Ovopel or Dagin. Aquacult. Res., 36: 1015–1025.
• BRZUSKA E. 2006. Artificial spawning of female Lithuanian strain B carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) after treatment with carp pituitary homogenate, Ovopel or [D-Tle⁶, ProNHEt⁹] GnRH-a (Lecirelin). Aquacult. Res., 37: 264–271.
• CEK S., GOKCE M.A. 2005. Evaluation of the photocopy method for counting Puntius conchonius eggs. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 29: 685–689.
• CHAO N.L. 2001. The fishery diversity and conservation of ornamental fishes in the Rio Negro Basin, Brasil: A review of Project Piaba (1989–1999). [In:] Conservation and management of ornamental fish resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia Brasil – Project Piaba. Eds N.L. Chao, P. Petry, G. Prang, L. Sonnenschein, M.T. Tlusty, Manaus, Brasil pp. 161–204.
• CHAPMAN F.A., COLLE D.E., ROTTMANN R.W., SHIREMAN J.V. 1998. Controlled spawning of the neon tetra. Progr. Fish-Cult., 60: 32–37.
• CHELAPPA S., CAMARA M.R., VERANI J.R. 2005. Ovarian development in the Amazonian Red Discus, Symphysodon discus Heckel (Osteichthyes: Cichlidae). Braz. J. Biol., 65: 609–616.
• ELIAS J. 2003. Tetra neonovh Paracheirodon innesi (Myers, 1936) (The neon tetra). Akvarium Terarium 46: 4–11.
• GOSH S., SINCHA A., SAHU C. 2007. Effect of probiotic on reproductive performance in female livebearing ornamental fish. Aquacult. Res., 38: 518–526.
• HAKUĆ-BŁAŻOWSKA A., KUPREN K., TURKOWSKI K., TARGOŃSKA K., JAMRÓZ M., KREJSZEFF S., KWIATKOWSKI M.,
• ŻARSKI D., KUCHARCZYK D. 2009. Comparison of economic effectiveness of applying different hormonal preparations for reophile cyprinid fish reproduction stimulation based on the example of asp Aspius aspius (L.) and ide Leuciscus idus (L.). Pol. J. Nat. Sci. 24(4): 224–234.
• HUBBS C., BRYAN C. 1974. Effect of parental temperature experience on thermal tolerance of eggsof Menidia audens. [In:] The Early Life History of Fish. Ed. J.H.S. Blaxter. Springer, pp. 431–435.
• JUNK W.J., SOARES M.G.M. 2001. Freshwater fish habitats in Amazonia: state of knowledge, management, and protection. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 4: 437–451.
• KOUŘIL J., SVOBODA M., HAMAČKOVA J., KALÁB P., KOLÁŘOVÁ J., LEPIČOVÁ A., SEDOVA M., SAVINA L., MORENO RENDÓN P., SVOBODOVÁ Z., BARTH T., VYKUSOVÁ B. 2007. Repeated administration of different hormonal preparations for artificial propagation and their effects on reproduction, survival and blood biochemistry profiles of female tench (Tinca tinca L.). Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52(6): 183–188.
• KRAAK G.V.D., PANKHURST N.M. 1996. Temperature effects on the reproductive performance of fish. [In:] Global Warning: Implications for freshwater and marine fish. Eds. C.M. Woods, D.G.McDonalds. Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–176.
• KREJSZEFF S., KUCHARCZYK D., KUPREN K., TARGOŃSKA K., MAMCARZ A., KUJAWA R., KACZKOWSKI Z., RATAJSKI S. 2008. Reproduction of chub, Leuciscus cephalus L., under controlled conditions. Aquacult. Res., 39: 907–912.
• KREJSZEFF S., TARGOŃSKA K., ŻARSKI D., KUCHARCZYK D. 2009. Domestication affects spawning of the ide (Leuciscus idus) – preliminary study. Aquaculture, 295: 145–147.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., SKRZYPCZAK A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1996. Induced spawning in perch, Perca fluviatilis L. using carp pituitary extract and HCG. Aquacult. Res., 27: 847–852.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., ŁUCZYŃSKI M., GLOGOWSKI J., BABIAK I., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1997a. Induced spawning in bream, Abramis brama (L.), using carp and bream pituitary extract and hCG. Aquacult. Res., 28: 139–144.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1997b. Artificial spawning in bream (Abramis brama (L.)). Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 44: 203–207.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1997c. Induced spawning in rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus L.). Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 44: 209–213.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., SKRZYPCZAK A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1998. Induced spawning in perch, Perca fluviatilis L., FSH + LH with pimozide or metoclopramide. Aquacult. Res., 29: 131–136.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., TARGOŃSKA-DIETRICH K., WYSZOMIRSKA E., GLOGOWSKI J., BABIAK I., SZABO T. 2005. Induced spawning in bream (Abramis brama L.) using pellets containing GnRH. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 89–95.
• KUCHARCZYK D., TARGOŃSKA K., HLIWA P., GOMUŁKA P., KWIATKOWSKI M., KREJSZEFF S., PERKOWSKI J. 2008a. Reproductive parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L) spawners during natural season and out-of-season spawning. Reprod. Biol., 8(3): 285–289.
• KUCHARCZYK D., TARGOŃSKA K., PRUSIŃSKA M., KREJSZEFF S., KUPREN K., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A. 2008b. Reproduction of Buenos Aires tetra (Hemigrammus caudovittatus) under controlled conditions. Pol. J. Nat. Sci., 23(4): 858–865.
• KUJAWA R., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A. 1999. A model system for keeping spawners of wild and domestic fish before artificial spawning. Aquacult. Eng., 20: 85–89.
• KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., KUCHARCZYK D., SKRZYPCZAK A. 2000. An experimental unit for rearing of larval freshwater fish. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin., Piscaria, 205: 103–108.
• KUPREN K., KUCHARCZYK D., PRUSIŃSKA M., KREJSZEFF S., TARGOŃSKA K., MAMCARZ A. 2008. The influence of stocking density on survival and growth of Buenos Aires tetra Hemigrammus caudovittatus larvae reared under controlled conditions. Pol. J. Nat. Sci., 23(4): 881–887.
• LIM L. C., CHO Y. L., DHERT P., WONG C. C., NELIS H., SORGELOOS P. 2002. Use of decapsulated Artemia cysts in ornamental fish culture. Aquacult. Res., 33: 575–589.
• OLIVIER A., KEISER H. 1997. A comparison of growth, survival rate, and number of maricetabie fish produced of swordtaiis, Xiphophorus hellerl Heckei (Family Poeciliidae), between two types of culture systems. Aquacult. Res., 28: 215–221.
• RAGHAVAN R., TLUSTY M., PRASAD P., PEREIRA B., ALI A., SUJARITTANONTA L. 2007. Should endemic and threatened freshwater ornamental fishes of Kerala part of the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot be captive bread for international trade? Current Science, 93: 1211–1213.
• SCHEURMANN I. 1990. Aquarium Fish Breeding. Baron’s Educational Series Inc. Hauppauge, N.Y. 144 pp.
• SZABO T. 2003. Ovulation induction in northern pike Esox lucius L. using different GnRH analogues, Ovaprim, Dagin and carp pituitary. Aquacult. Res., 34: 479–486.
• TARGOŃSKA K. 2007. Wykorzystanie larw ochotek z rodzaju Chironomus w hodowli wybranych gatunków ryb. PhD Thesis. UWM Olsztyn, pp.140. (in Polish with English summary).
• TARGOŃSKA K., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A., GLOGOWSKI J., KREJSZEFF S., PRUSIŃSKA M., KUPREN K. 2008. Influence of individual variability in the percentage of motile spermatozoa and motility time on the survival of embryos of chosen fish species. Pol. J. Nat. Sci., 23(1): 178–187.
• TLUSTY M. 2002. The benefits and risks of aquacultural production for the aquarium trade. Aquaculture, 205: 203–219.
• WEITZMAN S.H., FINK W. L. 1987. Neon Tetra relationships and phylogenetic systematics. Tropical Fish Hob., 36: 72–77.
• ŻARSKI D., KUCHARCZYK D., TARGOŃSKA K., JAMRÓZ M., KREJSZEFF S., MAMCARZ A. 2009. Application of ovopel and ovaprim and their combinations in controlled reproduction of two reophilic cyprinid fish species. Pol. J. Nat. Sci., 24(4): 235–244.