PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2010 | 55 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Abundance, population structure and seasonally changing social organization of argali Ovis ammon karelini in West-Central Tian-Shan of Kyrgyzstan

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The main aim of this study was to determine the numbers, population structure and seasonal changes in group structure of argali Ovis ammon karelini Severtzov, 1873 in the Tian-Shan of Kyrgyzstan. The study was carried out within two adjoining areas: the Baralbas River region, and the Ak-Tash River region. Data were collected during three seasons: winter, spring and summer. This population consisted of 42.3% females, 22.2% males, 13.4% yearlings, and 22.1% lambs. Composition and numbers of groups were seasonally changing. Argali occurred predominantly in mixed groups during winter and exclusively in separated groups during summer. The maximum group size decreased from 25% from winter to spring, however, increased during summer.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

55

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.27-34,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynow str.1H, 20-708 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Aung M., Mcshea W. J., Htung S., Than A. and Tin M. S. 2001. Ecology and social organization of a tropical deer (Cervus eldi thamin). Journal of Mammalogy 82: 836–847. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082〈0836:EASOOA>¨.0. CO;2
  • Borkowski J. 2000. Influence of the density of a sika deer population on activity, habitat use, and group size. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 1369–1374. doi: 10.1139/ cjz-78-8-1369
  • Borries C., Larney E., Lu A., Ossi K and Koenig A. 2008. Costs of group size: lower developmental and reproductive rates in larger groups of leaf monkeys. Behavioral Ecology 19: 1186–1191. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arn088
  • Byers J. A. 1997. American pronghorn: social adaptations & the ghosts of predators past. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–318.
  • Caro T.M., Graham C.M., Stoner C.J. and Vargas J.K. 2004. Adaptive significance of antipredator behaviour in artiodactyls. Animal Behaviour 67: 205–228. doi: 10.1016/ j.anbehav.2002.12.007
  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Iason G. R. and Guinness F. E. 1987. Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology, London 211: 275–289. doi: 10.1111/ j.1469-7998.1987.tb01534.x
  • Conradt L., Clutton-Brock T. H. and Guinness F. E. 2000. Sex differences in weather sensitivity can cause habitat segregation: red deer as an example. Animal Behaviour 59: 1049–1060. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1409
  • Corti P. and Shackleton D. M. 2002. Relationship between predation-risk factors and sexual segregation in Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli dalli). Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 2108–2117. doi: 10.1139/z02-207
  • Cransac N., Gerard J. F., Maublanc M. L. and Pépin D. 1998. An example of segregation between age and sex classes only weakly related to habitat use in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini). Journal of Zoology, London 244: 371–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00042.x
  • Drozd L. 1994. [A study on Argali (Ovis ammon Linnaeus, 1758) occurring in Mongolia]. DSc thesis, Akademia Rolnicza, Lublin: 1–47. [In Polish]
  • Dzięciołowski R., Krupka J., Bajandelger and Dziedzic R. 1980. Argali and Siberian ibex populations in the Khuhsyrh Reserve in Mongolian Altai. Acta Theriologica 25: 213–219.
  • Farrington J. D. 2005. De-development in Eastern Kyrgystan and persistence of semi nomadic livestock Herding. Nomadic People 9: 171–197. doi: 10.3167/08227940 5781826191
  • Fedosenko A. K. 2000. [Arkhar in Russia and neighbouring countries (population status, ecology, conservation, protection and economic use)]. Izdatelstvo Gu Tsentrokhotkontrol, Moskva: 1–291. [In Russian]
  • Fedosenko A. K. and Blank D. A. 2005. Ovis ammon. Mammalian Species. 773: 1–15. doi: 10.1644/1545-1410(2005) 773[0001:OA]2.0.CO;2
  • Gerard J. F., Bideau E., Maublanc M. L., Loisel P. and Marchal C. 2002. Herd Size in Large Herbivores: Encoded in the Individual or Emergent? Biological Bulletin 202: 275–282. doi:10.2307/1543479
  • Guilhem C., Bideau E., Gerard J.-F. Maublanc M. L. and Pépin D. 2006. Early differentiation of male and female interactive behaviour as a possible mechanism for sexual segregation in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98: 54–69. doi:10.1016/ j.applanim.2005.08.010
  • Guo S., Yu Y., Li B., Gu Z., Tu X. and Wang X. 2003. Study on herd structure and daytime activity rhythm of argali (Ovis ammon karelini) in autumn of Tianshan. Acta Theriologica Sinica 23: 27–30.
  • Harris R. B. and Bedunah D. J. 2001. Sheep vs. sheep: Argali and livestock in western China. Unpublished final report, University of Montana, Missoula: 1–53.
  • Ianushevich A. I. 1954. [Adaptations of Kyrgyzstan’s fauna]. Trudy Instituta Zoologii i Parazitologii Kirgiskoi Filii AN SSSR 3: 57–64. [In Russian]
  • Ianushevich A. I. 1981. [Rare mammals and birds of Kyrgyz Republic]. Izdatelstvo Ilim, Frunze: 1–62. [In Russian]
  • Ianushevich A. I. and Kydyraliev A. K. 1956. [Mammals and birds of syrts]. Trudy Instituta Zoologii i Parazitologii Kirgiskoi Filii AN SSSR (5): 37–49. [In Russian]
  • Iashchenko R. V. 2006. [Reserves of Middle Asia and Kazakhstan]. Protected Areas of Middle Asia and Kazakhstan. 1-Tetis, Almaty: 1–352. [In Russian]
  • Ivashenko A. A. 1973 [About numbers of Arkhar in Aksu-Dzhabagly Reserve and intentions for improving its protection]. [In: Rare mammalian species of USSR fauna and their protection. V. E. Sokolov, ed]. Izdatelstvo Nauka, Moskva: 119–120. [In Russian]
  • Jarman P. J. 1974. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48: 215–267. doi: 10.1163/156853974X00345
  • Johnson K. A. and Williams S. 2002. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Retention of Threatened Status for Argali in Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, and Tajikistan. Federal Register 67: 35942–35957.
  • Klich D. 2007. [Functional and structural organisation of Tian-Shan Argali population in West-Central Tian-Shan]. PhD thesis, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin: 1–148. [In Polish]
  • Krasińska M. and Krasiński Z. A. 1995. Composition, group size, and spatial distribution of European bison bulls in Białowieża Forest. Acta Theriologica 40: 1–21.
  • Kuznetsov B. A. 1948. [Animals of Kyrgyz Republic]. Moskovskoe Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Prirody, Moskva, Moskva: 1–209. [In Russian]
  • Le Pendu Y., Guilhem C., Briedermann L. and Maublanc M. L. 2000. Interactions and associations between age and sex classes in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini) during winter. Behavioral Processes 52: 97–107. doi: 10.1016/ S0376-6357(00)00129-7
  • Li Z. and Jiang Z. 2008. Group size effect on vigilance: Evidence from Tibetan gazelle in Upper Buha River, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Behavioural Processes 78: 25–28. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.11.011
  • Magomedov M. R. D., Abaturov B. D., Akhmedov E. G., IarovenkoIu. A. and Subbotin A. E. 2002a. Present status of Pamir Argali population (Ovis ammon polii, Blyth 1840) in Tajikistan. Report for SCIF Wildlife Conservation: 1–66.
  • Magomedov M. R. D., Akhmedov E. G., Subbotin A. E., Bajdavletov R. Zh. and Kasynbekov E. B. 2002b. Present status of Argali (Ovis ammon) population in central Kazakhstan. Report for SCIF Wildlife Conservation: 1–48.
  • Magomedov M. R. D., Akhmedov E. G., Subbotin A. E., Iarovenko Yu. A., Klich D. and Baidavletov R. J. 2005. [Density and population structure of Argali (Ovis ammon l. 1758) in Central Asia]. Proceedings of the Institute of Biology MAS, Ulan Bator 25: 146–153. [In Russian]
  • Meklenburtsev R. N. 1948. [Pamir Argali Ovis ammon polii Blyth. Biology and hunting-industrial significance]. Biulleten Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody 53(5): 65–84. [In Russian]
  • Molvar E. M. and Bowyer R. T. 1994. Costs and benefits of group living in a recently social ungulate: the Alaskan moose. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 621–630. doi: 10.2307 /1382509
  • Mooring M. S., Fitzpatrick T. A., Benjamin J. E., Fraser I. C., Nishihira T. T., Reisig D. D. and Rominger E. M. 2003. Sexual segregation in desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana). Behaviour 140: 183–207. doi: 10.1163/156853903321671497
  • Namgail T. 2004. Interactions between argali and livestock, Gya-Miru Wildlife Sanctuary, Ladakh, India. Final Project Report to the International Snow Leopard Trust: 1–39.
  • Namgail T., Fox J. L. and Bhatnagar Y. V. 2007. Habitat shift and time budget of the Tibetan argali: the influence of livestock grazing. Ecological Research 22: 25–31. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0015-y
  • Pays O., Benhamou S., Helder R. and Gerard J. F. 2007. The dynamics of group formation in large mammalian herbivores: an analysis in the European roe deer. Animal Behaviour 74: 1429–1441. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav. 2007.02.012
  • Pépin D. and Gerard J. F. 2008. Group dynamics and local population density dependence of group size in the Pyrenean chamois, Rupicapra pyrenaica. Animal Behaviour 75: 361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.030
  • Pleshak T. V. 1980. [Into ecology of Argali during spring]. [In: Ungulates of USSR fauna. Papers’ theses AN USSR]. Izdatelstvo Nauka, Moskva: 194–195. [In Russian]
  • Reading R. P., Amgalanbaatar S. and Lhagvasuren B. 1997. Argali Ovis ammon in Mongolia’s South Gobi. Oryx 31: 285–294. doi:10.1017/S0030605300022249
  • Ruckstuhl K. E. 1998. Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep. Animal Behaviour 56: 99–106. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0745
  • Ruckstuhl K. E., Festa-Bianchet M. and Jorgenson J. T. 2003. Bite rates in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): effects of season, age, sex and reproductive status. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54: 167–173.
  • Schaller G. B. and Kang A. 2008. Status of Marco Polo sheep Ovis ammon polii in China and adjacent countries: conservation of a vulnerable subspecies. Oryx 42: 100–106. doi:10.1017/S0030605308000811
  • Schillhorn van Veen T.W. 1995. The Kyrgyz sheep herders at a crossroads. Pastoral Development Network Series 38: 1–14.
  • Schradin C. and Pillay N. 2005. Intraspecific variation in the spatial and social organization of the African striped mouse. Journal of Mammalogy 86: 99–107. doi: 10.1644/ 1545-1542(2005)086〈0099:IVITSA>¨.0.CO;2
  • Shulpin L. I. 1948. [Data on mammals and reptiles of Talasski Alatau]. Izdatelstvo AN Kazakhskoi SSR. Seria Zoologicheskaya 7: 65–68. [In Russian]
  • Sokolov I. I. 1959. Ungulates (orders Perissodactyla and Artiodactyla), mammals. [In: USSR fauna. I. I. Sokolov, ed]. Izdatelstvo AN SSSR, Moskva 1: 569–598. [In Russian]
  • Stewart K. M., Fulbright T. E, Drawe D. L. and Bowyer R. T. 2003. Sexual segregation in white-tailed deer: responses to habitat manipulations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31: 1210–1217.
  • Sundaresan S. R, Fischhoff I. R., Dushoff J. and Rubenstein D. I. 2007. Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission-fusion species, Grevy’s zebra and onager. Oecologia 151: 140–149. doi: 10.1007/ s00442-006-0553-6
  • Tsalkin V. I. 1951. [Mountain sheep of Europe and Asia]. Moskovskoe Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Prirody, Moskva: 1–344. [In Russian]
  • Wilson R. T. 1997. Livestock, pastures and the environment in the Kyrgyz Republic, Central Asia. Mountain Research and Development 17: 57–68.
  • Wirtz P. and Lörscher J. 1983. Group sizes of antelopes in an East African national park. Behaviour 84: 135–156. doi:10.1163/156853983X00327
  • Yearsley J. M. and Pérez-Barbería F. J. 2005. Does the activity budget hypothesis explain sexual segregation in ungulates? Animal Behaviour 69: 257–267. doi: 10.1016/ j.anbehav.2004.04.010

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-66a0c36f-ba1c-44a0-adef-b9c62bd14086
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.