Diet of a Piedmont population of Ctenomys mendocinus [Rodentia, Ctenomyidae]: seasonal patterns and variations according sex and relative age

• Autorzy: Puig S. , Rosi M.I. , Cona M.I. , Roig V.G. , Monge S.A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Dietary composition was determined seasonally in males and females of Ctenomys mendocinus Philippi, 1869 from the Andean Piedmont (Mendoza, Argentina) during the reproductive and non-reproductive period. Reproductive condition and relative age of each animal was determined. Stomach contents were individually analyzed with the microhistological technique, Dietary generalism is supported by the high propor­tion of available genera eaten, but the intensity and continuity of use suggested specialization on grasses. Prédation risk induces minimization of the exposure time out of the burrow, and could justify the specialization in grasses, considering that other rodents showed lower harvest and handling times for grasses than for shrubs. Males had a more varied diet than females in winter, and the opposite occurred in spring. Since males have been found to dig longer burrow systems than females in winter, searching for mates might cause males to intersect a higher number of food items during that season. Higher energetic and nutritional requirements associated with pregnancy and nursing may lead to the inclusion of more food items in the spring diet of females, and their higher specialization on grasses. Dietary similarities between immature and mature individuals suggested that age did not affect selection of diet items. Seasonal variation in dietary diversity suggested a foraging strategy adaptive to environmental seasonal variations and to the subterranean life style.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

reproduction; dietary composition; foraging strategy; Mendoza; Rodentia; rodent; diet; Argentina; Ctenomys mendocinus; Andean Piedmond; Ctenomyidae; age; Piedmont population

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 1999
• Tom: 44
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.15-27,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Puig S.

autor

Rosi M.I.

autor

Cona M.I.

autor

Roig V.G.

autor

Monge S.A.

Bibliografia

• Andersen D. C. and MacMahon J. A. 1981. Population dynamics and bioenergetics of a fossorial herbivore, Thomomys talpoides (Rodentia: Geomyidae), in a spruce-fir sere. Ecological Monographs 51: 179-202.
• Bandoli J. H. 1981. Factors influencing seasonal burrowing activity in the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae. Journal of Mammalogy 62: 293-303.
• Batzli G. O. 1986. Nutritional ecology of the California vole: effects of food quality on reproduction. Ecotogy 67: 406-412.
• Baumgartner L. L. and Martin A. C. 1939. Plant histology as an aid in squirrel food habit studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 3: 266-268.
• Braun R. H., Candia R. J., Leiva R., Paez M. N., Stasi C. R. and Wuilloud C. F. 1978. Productividad primaria aérea neta del algarrobal de Ñacuñán (Mendoza). Deserta 5: 7-43.
• Busch C., Malizia A. I., Scaglia O. A. and Reig O. A. 1989. Spatial distribution and attributes of a population of Ctenomys talarurn {Rodentia, Octodontidae). Journal of Mammalogy 70: 204-208.
• Camin S. R. and Madoery L. A. 1994. Feeding behavior of the tuco tuco (Ctenomys mendocinus): its modifications according to food availability and the changes in the harvest pattern and consum­ption. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 67: 257-263.
• Capitanetli R. 1972. Geología, geomorfología, climatología, fttogeografia y zoogeografía de la provincia de Mendoza. Suplemento del Boletín de la Asociación Argentina de Botánica 13: 15-49.
• Clark D. A. 1980. Age- and sex-dependent foraging strategies of a small mammalian omnivore. Animal Ecology 49: 549-563.
• Cockburn A, 1981. Population regulation and dispersion of the smoky mouse, Pseudomys fumeus. I. Dietary determinants of microhabitat preference. Australian Journal of Ecology 6: 231-254.
• Comparatore V. M., Cid M. S. and Busch C. 1995. Dietary preferences of two sympatric subterranean rodent populations in Argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 68: 197-206.
• Dalmasso A. D. 1994. Fenología de cinco gramíneas nativas de interés forrajero, Pappophorum caaspitosum, Trichloris crinita, Setaria leucopila, Digitaria californica y Diplachne dubia. Multequina 3: 9-34.
• Duci J. L. 1949. Methods for the determination of food habits by plant microtechniques and histology and their application to cotton tail rabbit food habits. The Journal of Wildlife Management 13: 295-298.
• Gales R. P. 1982. Age- and sex-related difference in diet selection by Rattus on Steward Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 9: 463-466,
• Hansen R. M. 1960. Age and reproductive characteristics of mountain pocket gophers in Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy 41: 323-335.
• Heth G., Golenberg E. M, and Nevo E. 1989. Foraging strategy in a subterranean rodent, Spalax ehrenhergi: a test case for optima! foraging theory. Oecologia 79: 496^505.
• Holechek J. and Gross B. 1982. Evaluation of different calculation procedures for microhistological analysis. Journal of Range Management 35: 721-723.
• Huntly N. and Reichman O. J, 1994. Effects of subterranean mammalian herbivores on vegetation. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 852-859.
• Kincaid W. B. and Cameron G. N. 1982. Dietary variation in three sympatric rodents on the Texas coastal prairie. Journal of Mammalogy 63: 668-672.
• Krebs C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Collins, New York: 1-654.
• Krebs J. R. 1978. Optima! foraging: Decision rules for predators. ¡In: Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds], Blackwelt, Oxford: 23-63.
• Luo J.I, Fox B. J. and Jefferys E. 1994. Diet of the Eastern Chestnut Mouse (Pseudomys gracilicau- datus), I. Composition, diversity and individual variation. Wildlife Research 21: 401-417.
• Madoery L. 1993. Composición botánica de la dieta del tuco-tuco (Ctenomys mendocinus) en el piedemonte precordillerano, Ecología Austral 3: 49-55.
• Méndez E. 1992. Conservación de nuestros ecosistemas naturales. I. Los médanos de Potreriilos (Lujan de Cuyo, Mendoza). Multequina 1: 19-23.
• Morrison F, B. 1969. Alimentos y alimentación del ganado. Uteha, México: 737-1346.
• Nevo E. 1979. Adaptive convergence and divergence of subterranean mammals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 269-308.
• Oswald Ch. and McClure P, A, 1990. Energetics of concurrent pregnancy and lactation in cotton rats and woodrats. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 500-509.
• Passera C. B. Dalmasso A. D. and Duffar E. 1983. Ambiente físico y vegetación de las pampas de los Ñangos y Seca, Mendoza-Argentina. Deserta 7: 108-144.
• Passera C. B. and Borsetto O. 1989. Aspectos ecológicos de Atriplex lampa. Investigaciones Agrarias: Producción y Protección vegetales 4: 179-198.
• Puig S., Rosi M. I., Videla F. and Roig V. G. 1992. Estudio ecológico del roedor subterráneo Ctenomys mendocinus en la precordillera de Mendoza, Argentina: densidad poblacional y uso del espacio. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 65: 247-254.
• Pyke G. H., Pulliam H. R. and Charnov E, L. 1977. Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. The Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 137-154,
• Randolph P. A., Randolph J. C., Mattingly K. and Foster M. M. 1977. Energy costs of reproduction in the cotton rat, Sigmodon hip idus. Ecology 58: 31-45.
• Randolph J. C., Cameron G. N. and Wrazen J. A. 1991. Dietary choice of a generalist grassland herbivore, Sigmodon hispidas. Journal of Mammalogy 72: 300-313.
• Reichman O. J., Whitham T. G. and Ruffner G. A. 1982. Adaptive geometry of burrow spacing in two pocket gopher populations. Ecology 63: 687-695.
• Reig O. A., Busch C., Ortells M. O. and Contreras J. R. 1990. An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology, cytogenetics, molecular biology and speciation in Ctenomys. I In: Evolution of subterranean mammals at the organismal and molecular levels. E. Nevo and O. A. Reig, eds]. Alan R. Liss Inc., New York: 71-96.
• Rosi M. I., Scolaro J. A. and Videla F. 1992a. Distribución y relaciones sistemáticas entre poblaciones del género Ctenomys ÍRodentia, Ctenomyidae) de la provincia de Mendoza (Argentina). Miscel.lanía Zoológica 16: 207-222.
• Rosi M. I., Puig S., Videla F. Madoery L. and Roig V. G. 1992b. Estudio ecológico del roedor subterráneo Ctenomys mendocinus en la precordillera de Mendoza, Argentina: Ciclo reproductivo y estructura etaria. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 65: 221-233.Rosi M. I., Puig S., Videla F., Cona M. I, and Roig V. G. 1996a. Ciclo reproductivo y estructura etaria de C. mendocinus (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae) del Piedemonte de Mendoza, Argentina. Ecología Austral 6: 87-93.
• Rosi M. I., Cona M. I., Puig S., Videia F. and Roig V. G. 1996b. Size and structure of burrow systems of the fossorial rodent C, mendocinus in the piedmont of Mendoza province, Argentina. Zeitschrift fur Sáugetierkunde 61: 352-364.
• Stebbins L. L. 1977. Energy requirements during reproduction of Peromyscus maniculatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 55: 1701-1704.
• Van Valen L. 1978. The statistics of variation. Evolutionary Theory 4: 33-43.
• Vleck D. 1979. The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiological Zoology 52: 122-136.
• Wainstein P. and González S. 1962. Valor forrajero de trece especies de Stipa de Mendoza. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias (Mendoza) 9: 3-18.
• Wainstein P. and González S. 1971. Valor nutritivo de plantas forrajeras del este de la provincia de Mendoza (Reserva Ecológica de Ñacuñán), II. Deserta (IADIZA) 2: 77-85.
• Williams L. R. and Cameron G. N. 1986. Food habits and dietary preferences of Attwater's pocket gopher, Geomys attwateri. Journal of Mammalogy 67: 489-496.
• Wilson D. E. and Reeder D. A. M. (eds) 1993. Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London: 1-1206.
• Zar J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Second edition. Prentice-IIall Inc., New Jersey: 1—718.