PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2003 | 45 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Plant sexual reproduction: Aspects of interaction, history and regulation

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Sexual reproduction in angiosperms is an interactive process involving the sporophyte, gametophytes, embryo and endosperm as well as the environment, aimed at achieving pollination, fertilization and dispersal. This interaction occurs via an interface with nutrients and signals outside the cell and even outside the plant. Sexual reproduction has a history. In water, algae have different types of sex organs and gametes, and in some cases the female gamete stays on the plant. The zygote uses water movement and gravity for dispersal. Some algae have alternation of generations in the life cycle, and only the gametophyte functions in sexual reproduction. On land, ferns and mosses inherited alternation of generations, with oogamy and zygote development on the gametophyte, with wind dispersal of the meiospore. In angiosperms, heterospory and the retention of the megaspore, megagametophyte and embryo on the sporophyte lead to a seed with gravity and biotic dispersal. The history of sexual reproduction is based on sex determination, due to cross-fertilization and recombination. Sex differentiation is manifested in the increasing complexity of interaction in the nutrient supply, the retention of the gametophyte or even the embryo, and the type of vector of dispersal. Regulation of sexual reproduction in angiosperms is governed mainly by the sporophyte, with the expression of new genes for biotic pollination and seed dispersal. In the heterotrophic gametophyte some gene expression is suppressed. The development of sexual reproduction is due to the communication between the organism and a dynamic environment.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

45

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.19-26,fig.

Twórcy

  • Wageningen University, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands

Bibliografia

  • Chatelet P, Gindreau K, and Hervé Y. 1999. Development and use of microspore cultures applied to vegetable Brassica oleracea breeding. In: Clment C, Pacini E, Audran JC [eds.], Anther and pollen, 249-260. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo.
  • Coen ES, and Meyerowitz EM. 1991. The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 31-37.
  • Colombo LC, Franken J, Koetje E, van Went J, Dons HJM, Angenent GC, and van Tunen AJ. 1995. The Petunia MADS box gene FBP11 determines ovule identity. Plant Cell 7: 1859-1868.
  • Favre-Ducharte M. 1984. Homologies and phylogeny. In: Johri BM [ed.], Embryology of angiosperms, 697-735. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo.
  • Gutierrez-Cortines ME, and Davies B. 2000. Beyond the ABC’s: ternary complex formation in the control of floral organ identity. Trends in Plant Science 5: 471-476.
  • Friedman WE, and Carmichel JS. 1996. Double fertilization in Gnetales: implications understanding reproductive diversification among seed plants. International Journal of Plant Science 157: S77-S94.
  • Hong-Yuan Yang 2001. Apoplasic system of the gynoecium and embryo sac in relation to function. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 43: 7-14.
  • Herzfeld S. 1922. Ephedra campylopoda. Morphologie der weibliche Blüte und Befruchtungsvorgang. Denkschrift der Akademischen Wissenschaften Wien 98: 243-268.
  • Koltunow AM. 2000. The genetic and molecular analysis of apomixis in the model plant Hieracium. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 42: 61-72.
  • Maheswari SC, Sopory SK, Neera Bhalla-Sarin, and Khurana JP. 2001. The molecular basis of morphogenesis in plants - the making of the Arabidopsis flower. In: Rangaswamy NS [ed.], Phytomorphology Golden jubilee issue: Trends in plant science: 117-137.
  • Mol R. 1999. Embryological aspects of in vitro gynogenesis in plant organ cultures. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 41: 67-74.
  • Raghavan V. 1997. Molecular embryology of flowering plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Albert VA, Oppenheimer DG, dePamphills-Hong Ma CW, Frohlich MW, and Theissen G. 2002. Missing links: the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification. Trends in Plant Science 7: 22-30.
  • Willemse MTM. 1996. Progamic phase and fertilization in Gasteria verrucosa (Mill.) H. Duval: pollination signals. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9: 348-352.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-53412bb3-27ed-4fae-9131-b85064531a3b
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.