Determining temporary odour concentration under field conditions - comparison of methods

• Autorzy: Kosmider J , Krajewska B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The authors compared two methods of determining odour concentration under field conditions. Twelve series of odour measurements were carried out at a mink farm. Odour concentration was determined using a portable dynamic olfactometer (Nasal Ranger, St. Croix Sensory, Inc.) and by approximation using the psychophysical Weber-Fechner equation of S-logZ on odour intensity results. Odour concentrations were about 60 ou/m3 for both methods. Values of the ratio cod,WF/codNR were in the range of (0.2-5), which satisfies the requirements of EN 13725.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

odour intensity; field condition; environment protection; electronic nose; odour concentration; measurement apparatus; Nasal Ranger olfactometer; air quality; field olfactometer; odour measurement; n-butanol

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 16
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.215-225,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kosmider J

• Szczecin University of Technology, 42 Piastow Avenue, 71-065 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Krajewska B.

Bibliografia

• 1. RAPPERT S., MÜLLER R. Odor compounds in waste gas emissions from agricultural operations and food industries. Waste Management. 25, 887, 2005.
• 2. GOSTELOW P., PARSONS S.A., STUETZ R.M. Odour measurements for sewage treatment works. Water Res. 35 (3), 579, 2001.
• 3. BOCKREIS A., JAGER J. Odour monitoring by the combination of sensores and neural networks. Environmental Modelling and Software. 14 (5), 421, 1999.
• 4. BOHOLT K., ANDREASEN K., DENBERG F., HANSEN T. A new method for measuring emission of odour from a rendering plant using the Danish Odour Sensor System (DOSS ) artificial nose. Sensors and Actuators B. 106, 170, 2005.
• 5. ROMAIN A.C., GODEFROID D., NICOLAS J. Monitoring the exhaust air of a compost pile with an e-nose and comparison with GC–MS data. Sensors and Actuators B. 106, 317, 2005.
• 6. DI FRANCESCO F., LAZZERINI B., MARCELLONI F., PIOGGIA G. An electronic nose for odour annoyance assessment. Atmospheric Environment. 28 (1), 1225, 1994.
• 7. STUETZ R. M., ENGIN G., FENNER R. A. Sewage odour measurements using a sensory panel and an electronic nose. Water Science and Technology. 38 (3), 331, 1998.
• 8. SCHÜTZ S., SCHÖNING M.J., SCHROTH P., WEIßBECKER B., KORDOS, P., LÜTH H., HUMMEL H.E. An insect-based BioFET as a bioelectronic nose. Sensors and Actuators B. 65, 291, 2000.
• 9. GOPEL W. Chemical imaging I: Concepts and visions for electronic and bioelectronic noses. Sensors and Actuators B. 52, 125, 1998
• 10. SOHN J. H., SMITH R. J., YOONG E. Process studies of odour emissions from effluent ponds using machnie-based odour measuremenst. Atmospheric Environment. 40, 1230, 2006.
• 11. SZCZUREK A., MACIEJEWSK A M. Relationship between odour intensity assessed by human assessor and TGS sensor array response. Sensor and Actuators B. 106, 13, 2005.
• 12. YAMANAKA T., NAKAMOTO T. Real-time reference method in odor blender under environmental change. Sensor and Actuators B. 93, 51, 2003.
• 13. ISHIDA H., TOKUHIRO T., NAKAMOTO T., MORIIZUMI T. Improvement of olfactory video camera: Gas/odor flow visualization system. Sensors and Actuators B. 83, 256, 2002.
• 14. ISHIDA H., NAKAMOTO T., MORIIZUMI T., KIKAS T., JANATA J. Plume-tracking robots: a new application of chemical sensors. Biol. Bull. 200, 222, 2001.
• 15. ISO 6658:1998. Sensory analysis – Methodology – General guidance. l “#” PN-ISO 6658:1998. Analiza sensoryczna Metodologia Wytyczne ogólne.
• 16. ISO 5492:1997. Sensory analysis – Vocabulary (PN-ISO 5492:1997. Analiza sensoryczna Terminologia).
• 17. ISO 5496:1997. Sensory analysis – Methodology – Initiation and training of assessors in the detection and recognition of odours. (PN-ISO 5496:1997. Analiza sensoryczna – Metodologia – Wprowadzenie i szkolenie oceniających w wykrywaniu i rozpoznawaniu zapachów).
• 18. ISO 8589:1998. Sensory analysis – General guidance for the design of test rooms (PN-ISO 8589:1998. Analiza sensoryczna – Ogólne wytyczne dotyczące projektowania pracowni analizy sensorycznej).
• 19. VDI 3881. Blatt 1: Olfaktometrie. Geruchsschwellenbestimmung; Grundanforderungen; Blatt 2. Olfaktometrie; Geruchsschwellenbestimmung; Probenahme; Blatt 3. Olfaktometrie; Geruchsschwellenbestimmung; Olfaktometer mit Verdünnung nach dem Gasstrahlprinzip; Blatt 4. Olfaktometrie; Geruchsschwellenbestimmung; Anwendungsvorschriften und Verfahrenskenngrößen
• 20. VDI-Richtlinien 3882, Blatt I: VDI 3882 Blatt 1. Olfaktometrie; Bestimmung der Geruchsintensität / Olfactometry. Determination of Odour Intensity, Pub. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Dusseldorf. 1992
• 21. VDI 3940. Bestimmung der Geruchsstoffimmission durch Begehungen; Blatt 1: Bestimmung der Immissionshäufigkeit von erkennbaren Gerüchen; Rastermessung; Blatt 2: Fahnenmessung, Pub. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Dusseldorf.
• 22. NVN2820. Air Quality. Sensory Odour Measurement using an Olfactometer. The Measurement of odour Threshold value. Netherlands Normalization Institute. Delft, The Netherlands, 1990.
• 23. ASTM E679-91. Determination of Odor and Taste Threshold by a Forced-Choice Ascending Concentration Series Method of Limits.
• 24. ASTM E544-99(2004). Standard Practices for Referencing Suprathreshold Odor Intensity. 2004.
• 25. EN13725 (2003). Air quality – Determination of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry (PN-EN 13725 (U): Jakość powietrza. Oznaczanie stężenia zapachowego metodą olfaktometrii dynamicznej).
• 26. SCHIFFMAN S. et al. The effect of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents. Brain Research Bulletin. 37 (4), 369, 1995.
• 27. WINNEKE G., NEUF M., STEINHEIDER B. Separating the impact of exposure and personality in annoyance response to environmental stressors, particularly odors. Environ. Int. 22, 73, 1996.
• 28. BURLINGAME G. A. Odor profiling of environmental odors. Water Science and Technology. 40 (6), 31, 1999.
• 29. KL(AE)BOE R., KOLBENSTVEDT M., CLENCH-AAS J., BARTONOVA A. Oslo traffic study – part 1: an integrated approach to assess the combined effects of noise and air pollution on annoyance. Atmospheric Environment, 34 (27), 4727, 2000.
• 30. LUGINAAH I.N., TAYLOR S.M., ELLIOTT S.J., EYLES J.D. Community responses and coping strategies in the vicinity of a petroleum refinery in Oakville, Ontario. Health and Place. 8 (3), 177, 2002.
• 31. DEBRUYN G., VAN ELITT., KEGELS J. Case study: Intensive odour study at a non-ferrous metal plant in Belgium. 2nd. IWA International Workshop and Conference on Odour & VOC s. Singapur, 15-17.09.2003.
• 32. CARPENTIERI M., CORTI A. ZIPOLI L. Wind tunnel experiments of tracer dispersion downwind from a small scale physical model of a landfill. Environ. Modell. and Softw. 19, 881, 2004.
• 33. SIRONI S., CAPELLI L., CENTOLA P., DELROSSO R., IL GRANDE M. Odour emission factors for assessment and prediction of Italian MSW landfills odour impact. Atmospheric Environment. 39, 5387, 2005.
• 34. SOHN J.H., SMITH R.J., HUDSON N.A., CHOI H.L. Gas sampling efficiencies and aerodynamic characteristics of a laboratory wind tunnel for odour measurement. Biosystems Engineering. 92 (1), 37, 2005.
• 35. KAIYUN J., KAYE R. Comparison study on portable wind tunnel system and isolation chamber for determination of VOCs from areal sources. Water Science and Technology. 34, 583, 1996.
• 36. LEYRIS C., GUILLOT J.-M., FANLO J.-M, POURTIER L. Comparison and development of dynamic flux chambers to determine odorous compound emission rates from area sources. Chemosphere. 59 (3), 415, 2005.
• 37. SCHAUBERGER G., PIRINGER M., PETZ E. Separation distance to avoid odour nuisance due to livestock calculated by the Austrian odour dispersion model (AODM). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 87 (1), 13, 2001.
• 38. SARKAR U, HOBBS S.E., LONGHURST P. Dispersion of odour: a case study with a municipal solid waste landfill site in North London, United Kingdom. J. Environ. Manage. 68 (2), 153, 2003.
• 39. SHERIDAN B.A., HAYES E.T., CURRAN T.P., DODD V.A. A dispersion modelling approach to determining the odour impact of intensive pig production units in Ireland. Bioresour. Technol. 91 (2), 145, 2004.
• 40. JANES K. R., YANG S. X., HACKER R. R. Pork farm odour modelling using multiple-component multiple-factor analysis and neural networks. Applied Soft Computing. 6, 53, 2005.
• 41. KRAJEWSKA B., KOŚMIDER J. Standardy zapachowej jakości powietrza. Ochrona Powietrza i Problemy Odpadów, 6, 181, 2005. [in Polish]
• 42. FUJITA H. Environmental Odour Management in Japan, Environmental Odour Management, International Conference. Cologne, pp 71-76, 2004.
• 43. MAHINT. D. Measurement and Regulation of Odors in the USA, Odor Measurement Review, Office of Odor, Noise and Vibration Environmental Management Breau, Ed. Environment. Min. Japan, pp 62-67, 2003.
• 44. DRAGT J. Regulations in the Netherlands, and some practical experience, Semin. ODOURS ’93: Odours – Control, Measurement, Regulations, Świnoujście 1993, pp 63-74, Ed. EKOCHEM , Szczecin, 1993.
• 45. Ferstellung und Beurteilung von Geruchsimmision (Geruchsimmisions Richtlinie). Ministerium fur Umwelt, Raumordung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordheim- Westfalen, 1993.
• 46. PRINZ B. Odours. Regulations in Germany, Semin. ODOURS ’93: Odours – Control, Measurement, Regulations, Świnoujście 1993, pp 42-53, Ed. EKOCHEM , Szczecin, 1993.
• 47. KNAUER W. Experience with the odour control policy in Germany, Semin. ODOURS ’93: Odours – Control, Measurement, Regulations, Świnoujście 1993, pp 54-62, Ed. EKOCHEM , Szczecin, 1993.
• 48. VAN BROECK G., VAN ELST T., NIEUWEJAERS B. Recent Odour Regulation Developments in Flanders: Ambient Odour Quality Standards Based on Dose-Response Relationship. Water Science and Technology. 44 (9), 103, 2001.
• 49. KOŚMIDER J., MAZUR-CHRZANOWSKA B., WYSZYŃSKI B. Odory, Wyd. Naukowe PWN S.A., Warszawa, 2002. [in Polish]
• 50. KOŚMIDER J. Problemy normalizacji oznaczania stężenia odorów. Normalizacja. 1, 8, 2000. [in Polish]
• 51. KOŚMIDER J., KRAJEWSKA B. Odor Air Quality Standards and Precision of Odor Intensity Assessments. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 13, Suplement III , 87, 2004.
• 52. MCGINLEY C. Standardized Odor Measurement Practices for Air Quality Testing. Symposium on Air Quality Measurement. Methods and Technology—2002. pp 13-15, San Francisco, 2002.
• 53. A Detailed Assessment of The Science and Technology of Odor Measurement; pp 69, Prepared by: St. Croix Sensory, Inc., 30 June 2003; P.O. Box 313, 3549 Lake Elmo Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042, 1-800-879-9231; [e-mail] (http://www.pca.state.mn.us/publications/p-gen2-01.pdf).
• 54. IWASAKI Y., ISHIGURO T. Measurement of odor by triangle odor bag method (I). Japan Society Atmospheric Environment. 13 (6), 34, 1978.
• 55. NAGATA Y., TAKEUCHI N. Measurement of odor threshold by triangle odor bag metod. Bulletin of Japan Envirommental Sanitation Center, 17, 77, 1990.
• 56. UENO H., HIGUCHI M., TATSUICHI S., IWASAKI Y., NISHIKAWA J. Effect of panel performance on olfactometry. Environmental Odour Management, Cologne, 18.11.2004.
• 57. RUCH F. L., ZIMBARDO P. G. Psychologia i życie. Wyd. Nauk. PWN . Warszawa, 1996. [in Polish]
• 58. KOŚMIDER J. Projektowane standardy zapachowej jakości powietrza i możliwości oceny skutków wprowadzenia regulacji. Ochrona Powietrza i Problemy Odpadów. 3, 77, 2005. [In Polish]
• 59. KOŚMIDER J., WYSZYŃSKI B. Relationship between odour intensity and odorant concentration: logarithmic or power equation. Arch. Ochr. Środ. 28 (1), 29, 2002.
• 60. KOŚMIDER J., SOSIALUK M. Odour of acetone according to psychophysics laws. OLFACTORY BIORESPONSE III , P12, Drezno, December 2-5, 2003