Seasonal changes in social behaviour and spatial structure of Crocidura leucodon in North-Western Bulgaria

• Autorzy: Simeonovska-Nikolova D. M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The patterns of social behaviour and spatial structure of Crocidura leucodon (Hermann, 1780) were studied against the background of the seasonal changes in its density and demographic features. Field and lab research were conducted. Field investigations (with CMR method) were conducted from 1997 to 1999 in north-western Bulgaria, in a grassland with patches of tree-shrub vegetation. In the lab, the social interactions were studied in male-male, female-female and male-female dyadic encounters during summer and autumn. A total of 26 shrews were tested. The number of C. leucodon was lowest in spring and greatest in autumn. In early summer the sex ratio was balanced, the home range of one male overlapped that of one female, and aggressiveness and marking activity was increased. So, it can be assumed that in this period males and females form pairs, which possess defended territories. Higher aggressiveness and marking activity displayed by males suggest their greater role in defending the territories. In autumn the home ranges overlapped greatly and amicable interactions prevailed over agonistic ones probably due to shifting to a gregarious way of life. So, the patterns of spatial structure and social behaviour undergo the seasonal changes in C. leucodon life-cycle and its density dynamics.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social organization; social behaviour; spatial structure; interaction; spatial organization; Crocidura leucodon; home range; seasonal change; density; Bulgaria

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 49
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.167-179,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Simeonovska-Nikolova D. M.

• Sofia University, 8 Dragan Tzankov blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria

Bibliografia

• Baxter R. M. and Irwin D. 1995. A laboratory study of agonistic behaviour in the red musk shrew,Crocidura flavescens (I. Geoffroy, 1827). Zeitshrift für Säugetierkunde 60: 193–205.
• Baxter R. M. and Meester J. 1982. The captive behaviour of the red musk shrewCrocidura f. flavescens (Geoffroy, I. 1827) (Soricidae: Crocidurinae). Mammalia 46: 11–27.
• Cantoni D. 1993. Social and spatial organization of free-ranging shrews,Sorex coronatus andNeomys fodiens (Insectivora, Mammalia). Animal Behaviour 45: 975–995.
• Cantoni D. and Vogel P. 1989. Social organization and mating system of free-ranging, greater white-toothed shrews,Crocidura russula. Animal Behaviour 38: 205–214.
• Churchfield S. 1990. The natural history of shrews. Christopher Helm, London: 1–178.
• Croin Michielsen N. 1991. A field experiment of minimum territory size in the common shrewSorex araneus. Netherland Journal of Zoology 4: 85–98.
• Crowcroft P. 1955. Notes on the behaviour of shrews. Behaviour 8: 63–80.
• Crowcroft P. 1957. The life of the shrew. Max Reinhardt, London: 1–166.
• Frank F. 1984. Zur Arealverschiebung zwischenCrocidura russula undC. leucodon in NW Deutschland und zum wechselseitigen Verhältnis beider Arten. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 49: 65–70.
• Genoud M. 1988. Energetic strategies of shrews: ecological constraints and evolutionary implications. Mammal Review 18: 173–193.
• Genoud M. and Vogel P. 1990. Energy requirements during reproduction and reproductive effort in shrews (Soricidae). Journal of Zoology, London 220: 41–60.
• Hawes M. L. 1977. Home range, territoriality, and ecological separation in sympatric shrewsSorex vagrans andSorex obscurus. Journal of Mammalogy 58: 354–367.
• Hellwing S. 1975. Sexual receptivity and oestrus in the white-toothed shrew,Crocidura russula monacha. Journal of Reproduction and Fertilization 45: 469–477.
• Hristov L. 1974. Insektenfressende Säugern und Nagetiere in dem Rosental — Bulgarien. Bulletin de l’Institut de Zoologie et Musee 39: 29–60. [In Bulgarian with German summary]
• Hutterer R. 1985. Anatomical adaptations of shrews. Mammalian Review 15: 43–55.
• Krushinska N. and Rychlik L. 1993. Intra- and interspecific antagonistic behaviour in two sympatric species of water shrews:Neomys fodiens andN. anomalus. Journal of Ethology 11: 11–21.
• Krushinska N. and Rychlik L. 1994. Aggressiveness of aNeomys fodiens parous female towards conspecific andN. anomalus intruders. Acta Theriologica 39: 329–332.
• Krushinska N., Rychlik L. and Pucek Z. 1994. Agonistic interactions between resident and immigrant sympatric water shrews:Neomys fodiens andN. anomalus. Acta Theriologica 39: 227–247.
• Lehner P. 1996. Handbook of ethological methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–672.
• Michalak I. 1983. Reproduction maternal and social behaviour of the European water shrew under laboratory conditions. Acta Theriologica 28: 3–24.
• Nikitina N. A. 1965. The methods of the investigation of the mammals’ home ranges by live traps. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 44: 598–605. [In Russian]
• Oleinichenko V. Yu. 2000. Behaviour of the shrewsSorex volnuchini andS. raddei. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 79: 939–953. [In Russian with English summary]
• Oleinichenko V. Yu., Dolgov V. A., Bannikova A. A. and Kuptsov A. V. 2002. Behaviour and some features of managing territory bySorex satunini. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 81: 734–744. [In Russian with English summary]
• Olsen R. W. 1969. Agonistic behavior of the short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda). Journal of Mammalogy 50: 494–500.
• Platt W. J. 1976. The social organization and territoriality of short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda) population in old-field habitats. Animal Behaviour 24: 305–318.
• Peshev Tz., Peshev D. and Popov V. (in press). [Fauna of Bulgaria. Mammals]. Marin Drinov Press, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia. [In Bulgarian]
• Popov V. 2000. Epigeobiont animal assemblages from two landscapes of the Bulgarian Black See Coast: Relationship to environmental gradients, assemblage structure and biodiversity. III. Mammals (Mammalia: Insectivora, Rodentia). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 52 (3): 79–96. [In English with Bulgarian summary]
• Rood J. P. 1965a. Observations on the home range and activity of the Scilly shrew. Mammalia 29: 507–516.
• Rood J. P. 1965b. Observations on population structure, reproduction and molt of the Scilly shrew. Journal of Mammalogy 46: 426–433.
• Rudran R. and Kunz T. 1996. Appendix 1: Ethics in research. [In: Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for mammals. D. E. Wilson, F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran and M. S. Foster, eds]. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London: 251–254.
• Rychlik L. 1998. Evolution of social systems in shrews. [In: Evolution of shrews. J. M. Wójcik and M. Wolsan, eds]. Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża: 347–406.
• Shchipanov N. A. 1986. On ecology of the scilly shrew (Crocidura suaveolens). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 65: 1051–1060. [In Russian]
• Shchipanov N. A. and Oleinichenko V. Yu. 1992a. On ecology of the white-toothed shrew (Crocidura leucodon). 2. A field study of spatially-ethological structure of the white-toothed shrew population. Two types settlements. Population number regulation in dependence on proportion of the settlements with different spatial structure. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 71: 110–122. [In Russian with English summary]
• Shchipanov N. A. and Oleinichenko V. Yu. 1992b. On ecology of the white-toothed shrew (Crocidura leucodon). 1. Behaviour, territory use and reproduction of the white-toothed shrew in experiment. A hypotetic scheme of the population density regulation. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 71: 69–84. [In Russian with English summary]
• Shchipanov N. A. and Oleinichenko V. Yu. 1993. The bicoloured white-toothed shrew. Behaviour, spatial-ethological and functional structure of populations. Nauka, Moscow: 1–131. [In Russian]
• Shchipanov N. A., Shilov A. I. and Bodyak N. D. 1987. Behaviour ofCrocidura suaveolens observed in confinement. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 66: 1540–1552. [In Russian with English summary]
• Stockley P., Searle J. B., Macdonald D. W. and Jones C. S. 1994. Alternative reproductive tactics in male common shrews — relationships between mate-searching behaviour, sperm production, and reproductive success as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34: 71–78.
• Stockley P., Searle J. B., Macdonald D. W. and Jones C. S. 1996. Correlates of reproductive success within alternative mating tactics of common shrew. Behavioral Ecology 7: 334–340.
• Vogel P. 1969. Beobachtungen zum intraspezifischen Verhalten der Hausspitzmaus (Crocidura russula Hermann, 1780). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 76: 1079–1086.
• Zuri I. and Rado R. 2000. Sociality and agonistic behaviour in the lesser white-toothed shrew,Crocidura suaveolens. Journal of Mammalogy 81: 606–616.