Apomixis in the sugar beet reproduction system

• Autorzy: Szkutnik T
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research on five lines of sugar beet with a tendency towards apomixis showed the presence of facultative apomicts among the studied plants (2.4%). Facultative agamospermy was detected by isozyme analysis and by nuclear DNA amount estimation using flow cytometry. Genetic segregation according to isozymes in seed progenies showed the presence of meiotic agamospermy; its probable mechanism was normal meiosis in tetraploid cells of the female archespore. The occurrence of cytologically unreduced male gametophytes was confirmed in 21% of the plants by the indirect method of determining ploidy level from the number of pore regions in mature pollen grains. These studies identified homozygotic sublines with a tendency towards apomixis, proposed for practical breeding at the Kutno Sugar Beet Breeding Company Ltd., to be included in breeding experiments as components of heterotic hybrids.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sugar-beet; Beta vulgaris; agamospermy; diplospory; parthenogenesis; flow cytometry; isoenzyme; reproductive system

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 52
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.87-96,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Szkutnik T

• Kutno Sugar Beet Breeding Company Ltd., Straszakow, 62-650 Klodawa, Poland

Bibliografia

• BAROCKA KH. 1966. Die Sektion Corollinae der Gattung Beta (Tournef.) L. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 56:379–388.
• BAYER RJ, RITLAND K, and PURDY BG. 1990. Evidence of partial apomixis in Antennaria media (Asteraceae: Inuleae)detected by the segregation of genetic markers. AmericanJournal of Botany 77(8): 1078–1083.
• BOGOMOLOV MA. 2005. Apomiksis i ego rol' v selektsii sakharnoy svekly. Sakharnaya svekla 8: 19–22.
• CLEIJ G, DE BOCK TSM, and LEKKERKERKER B. 1968. Crosses between Beta intermedia Bunge and B. vulgaris L.Euphytica 17: 11–20.
• CLEIJ G, DE BOCK TSM, and LEKKERKERKER B. 1976. Crosses between Beta vulgaris L. and B. lomatogona F. et M.Euphytica 25: 539–547.
• DALKE L. 1980. Samozgodność u jednonasiennego buraka cukrowego i możliwości jej wykorzystania w hodowli.Hodowla Roślin Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo 24(3):169–202.
• ELLERTON S, and HENDRIKSEN AJT. 1959. Note on the probable cause of occurrence of tetraploid plants in commercialtriploid varieties of sugar beet. Euphytica 8(2): 99–103.
• FILUTOWICZ A, and DALKE L. 1970. Charakterystyka gatunków sekcji Corollinae rodzaju Beta i możliwości ich wykorzystaniaw hodowli buraka cukrowego. Biuletyn InstytutuHodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin 5–6: 15–23.
• FILUTOWICZ A, and DALKE L. 1972. Mieszańce buraka cukrowego (Beta vulgaris L.) z Beta lomatogona F. et M. HodowlaRoślin Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo 16(2): 85–93.
• GALBRAITH DW, HARKINS KR, MADDOX JM, AYRES NM, SHARMA DP, and FIROOZABADY E. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis ofthe cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051.
• GERLACH D. 1965. Befruchtung und Autogamie bei Rubus caesius. Biologisches Zentralblatt 84(5): 611–633.
• GOEL S, CHEN Z, AKIYAMA Y, CONNER JA, BASU M, GUALTIERI G, HANNA WW, and OZIAS-AKINS P. 2006. Comparative physical mapping of the apospory-specific genomic region in twoapomictic grasses: Pennisetum squamulatum andCenchrus ciliaris. Genetics 173(1): 389–400.
• GOŚKA M. 1997. Monografie i Rozprawy Naukowe. Haploidy i Podwojone Haploidy Buraka Cukrowego (Beta vulgaris L.) oraz Możliwości Ich Wykorzystania w Hodowli.Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Radzików.
• HUO H, CONNER JA, and OZIAS-AKINS P. 2009. Genetic mapping of the apospory-specific genomic region in Pennisetum squamulatum using retrotransposon-based molecular markers.Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119(2): 199–212.
• JASSEM B. 1976. Embryology and genetics of apomixis in the section Corollinae of the genus Beta. Acta BiologicaCracoviensia Series Botanica 19: 149–172.
• JASSEM B. 1990. Apomixis in the genus Beta. Apomixis Newsletter 2: 7–23.
• JASSEM B, and JASSEM M. 1970. Embryological investigations into the polyploid Beta species of the Corollinae section. Genetica Polonica 11(3–4): 367–377.
• JASSEM M. 1973. Endosperm development in diploid, triploid and tetraploid seed of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Genetica Polonica 14(3): 295– 303.
• JOHRI BM, AMBEGAOKAR KB, and SRIVASTAVA PS. 1992. Comparative Embryology of Angiosperms, vol. 1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest. KOJIMA A, and NAGATO Y. 1992. Diplosporous embryo-sac formationand the degree of diplospory in Allium tuberosum.Sexual Plant Reproduction 5: 72–78.
• KOLLMANN J, STEINGER T, and ROY BA. 2000. Evidence of sexuality in European Rubus (Rosaceae) species based on AFLP and allozyme analysis. American Journal of Botany87(11): 1592–1598.
• KUŻDOWICZ A. 1958. Identyfikacja stopnia poliploidalności u buraka (Beta vulgaris L.) na podstawie liczby ujść łagiewkowych pyłku. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 27(3): 491–500.
• LEVITES EV. 1986. Genetika Izofermentov Rasteniy. Nauka, Novosibirsk.
• LEVITES EV, DENISOVA FS, and FILATOV GP. 1994. Genetic control of isozymes in the sugar beet. In: Markert CL, Scandalios JG, and Serov OL [eds], Isozymes: Organization and Roles in Evolution, Genetics and Physiology, 171–178. World Scientific, Singapore, New Jersey, London, Hong Kong.
• ŁOMNICKI A. 1995. Wprowadzenie do Statystyki dla Przyrodników. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
• MALETSKII SI. 2000. Binominal'nye raspredeleniya v geneticheskikh issledovaniyakh na rasteniyakh. Rossiyskaya Akademiya Nauk Sibirskoe Otdelenie Institut Tsitologii i Genetiki, Ministerstvo Sel'skogo Khozyaystva i Prodovol'stviya Rossii Novosibirskiy Gosudarstvennyy Agrarnyy Universitet, Novosibirsk.
• MALETSKII SI, and LEVITES EV. 2005. Epigenetika Rasteniy, Sbornik Nauchnykh Trudov. Rossiyskaya Akademiya Nauk Sibirskoe Otdelenie Institut Tsitologii i Genetiki, Novosibirsk.
• MALETSKII SI, and MALETSKAYA EI. 1996. Samofertil'nost' i agamospermiya u sakharnoy svekly (Beta vulgaris L.). Genetika 32(12): 1643–1650.
• MATZK F, MEISTER A, and SCHUBERT I. 2001. An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of monocotsand dicots. The Plant Journal 21: 97–108.
• MURAWSKI DA and BAWA KS. 1994. Genetic structure and mating system of Stemonoporus oblongifolius (Dipterocarpaceae)in Sri Lanka. American Journal of Botany 81(2): 155–160.
• NOGLER GA. 1984. Gametophytic apomixis. In: Johri BM [ed.], Embryology of Angiosperms, 475–518. Springer-Verlag,Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo.
• OWEN FV. 1945. Cytoplasmically inherited male-sterility in sugar beets. Journal of Agricultural Research 71(10): 423–440.
• PERFILIEVA LP. 2003. Apomiksys u riznykh form tsukrovoho buriaka. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskohoderzhavnoho ahrarnoho universytetu (spetsialnyivypusk) Biolohichni Nauky i Problemy Roslynnytstva:384–389.
• PODDUBNAYA-ARNOLDI VA. 1982. Kharakteristika Semeystv Pokrytosemennykh Rasteniy po Tsitoembriologicheskim Priznakam. Nauka, Moskva.
• RAVI M, MARIMUTHU MPA, and SIDDIQI I. 2008. Gamete formation without meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nature 451: 1121–1124.
• RODRIGUES JCM, and KOLTUNOW AMG. 2005. Epigenetic aspects of sexual and asexual seed development. Acta BiologicaCracoviensia Series Botanica 47(1): 37–49.
• SAVIDAN Y. 2001. Gametophytic apomixis. A successful mutation of the female gametogenesis. In: Bhojwani SS, and Soh WY [eds], Current Trends in the Embryology of Angiosperms, 419–433.
• Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London. SAVIDAN Y, CARMAN JG, and DRESSELHAUS T. 2001. The Flowering of Apomixis: from Mechanisms to Genetic Engineering. Mexico, DF: CIMMYT, IRD, European Commission DG VI (FAIR).
• SCANDALIOS JG. 1969. Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: a review. Biochemical Genetics 3: 37–79.
• SEDLOVSKIY AI, NURZHANOVA AA, and SEILOVA LB. 2001. Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding using apomictic forms.Proceedings of the Asian Agriculture Congress, 24–27 April 2001, 138. Manila, Philippines.
• SEILOVA LB. 1996. Apomiksis u sakharnoy svekly i ego ispol'- zovanie v prakticheskoy selektsii. Na pravakh rukopisi.Kazakhskaya Akademiya Sel'skokhozyaystvennykh Nauk,Almaty.
• SHARBEL TF, VOIGT ML, CORRAL JM, THIEL T, VARSHNEY A, KUMLEHN J, VOGEL H, and ROTTER B. 2009. Molecular signaturesof apomictic and sexual ovules in the Boechera holboelliicomplex. Plant Journal 58(5): 870–882.
• SHIRYAEVA EI. 1983. Tsitoembriologicheskoe izuchenie apomiksisa u Beta vulgaris L. Tezisy Dokladov VII Delegatskogo S'ezda Wsesoyuznogo Botanicheskogo Obshchestva, Donetsk 11–14 maya 1983, 272. Nauka, Leningrad.
• SVIRSHCHEVSKAYA A, and DOLEžEL J. 2000. Production and performance of gynogenetic sugarbeet lines. Journal of SugarBeet Research 37: 117–133.
• SZKUTNIK T, PRUSIŃSKA E, and CZERWCZAK U. 2001. Uzyskanie agamospermicznych potomstw u męskosterylnych roślinburaka cukrowego (Beta vulgaris L.). Biuletyn InstytutuHodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin 217: 249–261.
• ŚLIWIŃSKA E. 1997. Analiza cyklu komórkowego buraków cukrowych o różnym stopniu ploidalności za pomocącytometrii przepływowej. Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowlii Aklimatyzacji Roślin 202: 35–40.
• TASKIN KM, TURGUT K, and SCOTT RJ. 2004. Apomictic development in Arabis gunnisoniana. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 52: 155–160.
• VALLEJOS CE. 1983. Enzyme activity staining. In: Tanksley SD and Orton TJ [eds], Isozymes in Plant Genetics andBreeding, Part A, 469–516. Elsevier Science Publishers,Amsterdam.
• VAN GEYT JPCF, and SMED E. 1984. Polymorphism of some marker enzymes of the sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) investigatedby polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and starch gellectrophoresis. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 92:295–308.
• WENDEL JF, and STUBER CW. 1984. Plant isozymes: Enzymes studied and buffer systems for their electrophoretic resolutionin starch gels. Isozyme Bulletin 17: 4–11.
• YAN G, GUANGCHUN H, ZHIWEI W, DEDONG G, RUI Q, and RONGTIAN L. 2007. GISH and BAC-FISH study of apomictic BetaM14. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences 50(2):242–250.
• ZHU H, BI YD, YU LJ, GUO DD, and WANG BC. 2009. Comparative proteomic analysis of apomictic monosomic addition line of Beta corolliflora and Beta vulgaris L. in sugar beet. Molecular Biology Reports 36(8): 2093–2098.96 Szkutnik