Sequential P3 effects in a Posner's spatial cueing paradigm: Trial-by-trial learning of the predictive value of the cue

• Autorzy: Gomez C M , Flores A. , Digiacomo M.R. , Vazquez-Marrufo M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The neurocognitive consequences of correct or incorrect spatial prediction in a sequential S1-S2 paradigm were assessed. Sequential dependence on previous trial outcome (valid or invalid) was assessed by late Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) and behavioural responses. Two different experiments were performed, situating the target in the vertical (Experiment 1) or in the horizontal (Experiment 2) meridian. RTs and late positivities (P3a and P3b) were recorded. ERPs showed that posterior positivity (probably a P3b) was greater in invalid-valid trials than in valid-valid trials but lower than in valid- invalid trials. However, at the frontal electrodes, late positivity (probably a P3a) only appeared in valid-invalid trials, indicating that invalid trials are analyzed as novel-like stimuli. The P3b results suggest trial-by-trial learning of the predictive value of the cue, which needs to be updated as indicated by the pattern of P3b amplitudes: valid-invalid > invalid-valid > valid-valid.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

event-related potential; behavioural response; invalid-valid trial; valid-valid trial; trial; valid-invalid trial; learning; predictive value; sequential effect; spatial prediction; paradigm; statistical analysis; stimulus sequence

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 69
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.155-167,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gomez C M

• University of Seville, Spain

autor

Flores A.

autor

Digiacomo M.R.

autor

Vazquez-Marrufo M.

Bibliografia

• Anllo-Vento L (1995) Shifting attention in visual space: the effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials. Int J Neurosci 80: 353-370.
• Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108: 624-652.
• Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004) Conflict moni­toring and anterior cingulated cortex: An update. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 539-546.
• Brunia CH, Van Boxtel GJ (2001) Wait and see. Int J Psychophysiol 43: 213-242.
• Burle B, Allain S, Vidal F, Hasbrouck T (2005) Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control. Does conflict really matter? J Exp Psychol 31: 831-837.
• Clark RE, Manns JR, Squire LR (2002) Classical conditioning, awareness,and brain systems. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 524-531.
• Coull JT (1998) Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol 55: 343-361.
• Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E (2003) Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by prin­cipal component analysis. Cogn Brain Res 17: 637-650.
• Digiacomo MR, Marco-Pallarés J, Flores A, Gómez CM (2008) Wavelet analysis of the EEG during the neurocog- nitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets. Brain Res 1234: 94-103.
• Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 11: 357-428.
• Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14: 456-467.
• Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1982) The P300 compo­nent of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biol Psychol 14: 1-52.
• Eimer M (1993) Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial ori­enting. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88: 408­420.
• Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Näätänen R (1998) Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 590-604.
• Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J (1995) Event-related potential correlates of errors in reaction tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 44: 287-296.
• Fan J, Kolster R, Ghajar J, Suh M, Knight RT, Sarkar R, McCandliss BD (2007) Response anticipation and response: an event-related potentials and functional mag­netic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 27: 2272­2282.
• Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H (2001) The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25: 355-373.
• Fuster JM (2003) Cortex and Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
• Fuster JM (2004) Upper processing stages of the perception- action cycle. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 143-145.
• Gehring WJ, Gross B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensa­tion. Psychol Sci 4: 385-390.
• Gómez CM, Marco J, Grau C (2003) Preparatory visuo- motor cortical network of the contingent negative varia­tion estimated by current density. Neuroimage 20: 216­224.
• Gómez CM, Fernandez A, Maestu F, Amo C, Gonzalez­Rosa JJ, Vaquero E, Ortiz T (2004) Task-specific sensory and motor preparatory activation revealed by contingent magnetic variation. Cogn Brain Res 21: 59-68.
• Gómez CM, Flores A, Ledesma A (2007) Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contigent negative varia­tion period. Brain Res Bull 73: 40-47.
• Gómez CM, Flores A, Digiacomo MR, Ledesma A, González-Rosa JJ (2008) P3a and P3b components asso­ciated to the neurocognitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets. Neurosci Lett 430: 181-185.
• Gómez CM, Flores A, Digiacomo MR (2008) Increased brain activation during the processing of spatially inval- idly cued targets. Open Neuroimag J 2: 106-113.
• Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of respons­es. J Exp Psychol Gen 121: 480-506.
• Harter M, Miller S, Price N, Lalonde M, Keyes A (1989) Neural processes involved in directing attention. J Cogn Neurosci 3: 223-237.
• Holroyd CB, Coles MG (2002) The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 109: 679-709.
• Hopfinger JB, Buonocore MH, Mangun GR (2000) The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci 3: 284-291.
• Jongen EMM, Smulders FTY (2007) Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: Endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial. Psychol Res 71: 516-523.
• Kerns JG, Cohen JD, MacDonald AW 3rd, Cho RY, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2004) Anterior cingulate conflict monitor­ing and adjustments in control. Science 303: 1023-1026.
• Mangun GR, Hillyard SA (1991) Modulations of sensory- evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 1057-1074.
• Notebaert W, Gevers W, Verbruggen F, Liefooghe B (2006) Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of con- gruency effects. Psychon Bull Rev 13: 112-117.
• Perchet C, Garcia-Larrea L (2000) Visuo-spatial attention and motor reaction in children: An electrophysiological study of the "Posner" paradigm. Psychophysiol 37: 231-241.
• Perchet C, Revol O, Fourneret P, Mauguiere F, Garcia- Larrea L (2001) Attention Shifts and anticipatory mecha­nisms in hyperactive children: An ERP study using the Posner paradigm. Biol Psychiat 50: 44-57.
• Polich J (2007) Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 2128-2148.
• Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32: 3-25.
• Stürmer B, Leuthold H, Soetens E, Schroter H, Sommer W (2002) Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28: 1345-1363.
• Verleger R, Jaskowski P, Wascher E (2005) Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology 19: 165-181.
• Wronka E, Kaiser J, and Coenen AM (2008) The auditory P3 from passive and active three-stimulus oddball para­digm. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 68: 362-372.
• Vidal F, Burle B, Bonnet M, Grapperon J, Hasbroucq T (2002) Error negativity on correct trials: A reexamination of available data. Biol Psychol 64: 265-282.
• Yu AJ, Dayan P (2005) Uncertainty, neuromodulation and attention. Neuron 46: 681-692.