Microhabitat selection of the European rabbit on La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain

• Autorzy: Cabrera-Rodriguez F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Little information exists regarding habitat selection on oceanic islands for the introduced European rabbitOryctolagus cuniculus Linnaeus, 1758. I employed the sharp altitude gradient of one of the Canary Islands, La Palma, to analyze factors relating to rabbit abundance. I used pellet counts to assess rabbit abundance in relation to microhabitat variables during June and July of 1999 and 2001. Number of rabbits varied with grass cover in the different biotopes for both years. They were particularly abundant in biotopes at low elevation and with rich grass cover. Rabbits were more numerous in 2001 than in 1999, and selected shrub protection in places with high levels of grass cover. Areas with vegetation transformed by humans were particularly suitable for wild rabbits, in contrast to less disturbed island biotopes. Rabbit abundance was usually associated with rich grass cover, which might be a limiting factor on La Palma.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 51
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.435-442,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Cabrera-Rodriguez F.

• Consejeria de Medio Ambiente y Politica Territorial, Calle Galceran no 15, local 17 38002 S-C de Tenerife, Spain

Bibliografia

• Brown C. F. and Krausman P. R. 2003. Habitat characteristics of 3 leporid species in Southeastern Arizona. The Journal of Wildlife Management 67: 83–89.
• Calvete C., Estrada R., Angulo E. and Cabezas-Ruiz S. 2004. Habitat factors related to wild rabbit conservation in an agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecology 19: 531–542.
• Courchamp F., Chapouis J. L. and Pascual M. 2003. Mammal invaders on islands: impacts, control and control impact. Biological Review 78: 347–383.
• Fa J. E., Sharples C. M. and Bell D. J. 1999. Habitat correlates of European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) distribution after the spread of RVHD in Cádiz Province, Spain. Journal of Zoology, London 249: 83–96.
• Fernandez N. 2005. Spatial patterns in European rabbit abundance after a population collapse. Landscape ecology 20: 897–910.
• Flux J. T. and Fullagar P. J. 1983. World distribution of.the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Acta Zoologica Fennica 174: 75–77.
• Gauch H. G. Jr 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York: 1–298.
• Hair J. F. Jr, Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L. and Black W. C. 1995. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: 1–745.
• Hobbs N. T. and Hanley T. A. 1990. Habitat evaluation: do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity? The Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 515–522.
• Hulbert I. A. R., Jason G. R. and Racey P. A. 1996. Habitat utilization in a stratified upland landscape by two lagomorphs with different feeding strategies. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 315–324.
• Jaksic F. M. and Soriguer R. C. 1981. Predation upon the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in Mediterranean habitats of Chile and Spain: a comparative analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 50: 269–281.
• Kolb H. H. 1994. The use of cover and burrows by a population of rabbits (Mammalia:Oryctolagus cuniculus) in eastern Scotland. Journal of Zoology, London 233: 9–17.
• Krebs C. J. 1985. Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper and Row, Cambridge: 1–608.
• Laake J. L., Buckland S. T., Anderson D. R. and Burnham K. P. 1993. DISTANCE User’s Guide. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado: 1–432.
• Lance G. N. and Williams W. T. 1967. A general theory of classification sorting strategies. I Hierarchical systems. Computer Journal 9: 373–380.
• Lombardi L., Fernández N., Moreno S. and Villafuerte R. 2003. Habitat related differences in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) abundance, distribution, and activity. Journal of Mammalogy 84: 26–36.
• McCune B. and Mefford J. J. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon: 1–237.
• Moreno S. and Villafuerte R. 1995. Traditional management of scrubland for the conservation of rabbitsOryctolagus cuniculus and their predators in Doñana national park, Spain. Biological Conservation 73: 81–85.
• Morris D. W. 1996. Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology 77: 2352–2364.
• Morrison M. L. 2001. A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationships studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 65: 613–623.
• Morrison M. L., Marcot B. G. and Mannan R. W. 1998. Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison: 1–435.
• Mueller-Dombois D. and Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 1–547.
• Orrock J. L., Pagels J. F., MsShea W. J. and Harper E. K. 2000. Predicting presence and abundance of a small species: the effect of scale and resolution. Ecological Applications 10: 1356–1366.
• Palomares F. 2001. Comparison of 3 methods to estimate rabbit abundance in a Mediterranean environment. Wildlife Bulletin 29: 578–585.
• Palomares F. and Delibes M. 1997. Predation upon European rabbits and their use of open and closed patches in Mediterranean habitats. Oikos 80: 407–410.
• Santos-Guerra A. 1983. Vegetación y flora de La Palma. Editorial Interinsular de Canarias, S. A. Santa Cruz de Tenerife 1–348.
• Santos-Guerra A. 1990. Evergreen forests in the Macaronesian region. Nature and environmental series, number 49. Steering committee for the conservation and management of the environment and natural habitats. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France: 1–78.
• Simmonetti J. A. 1989. Microhabitat use byOryctolagus cuniculus in Central Chile. A reassessment. Mammalia 53: 363–368.
• StatSoft, Inc. (2004). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com
• Tabachnick B. G. and Fidell L. S. 1983. Using multivariate statistics. Harper and Row. New York: 1–932.
• Tiver F. and Andrew M. H. 1997. Relative effects of herbivory by sheeps, rabbits, goats and kangaroos on recruitment and regeneration of shrubs and trees in Eastern South Australia. The Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 903–914.
• Van Horne B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 893–901.
• Villafuerte R., Lazo A. and Moreno S. 1997. Influence of food abundance and quality on rabbit fluctuations: Conservation and management implications in Doñana National Park (SW Spain). Revue d’Ecologie: La Terre et la Vie 52: 345–356.
• Villafuerte R., Kufner M. B., Delibes M. and Moreno S. 1993. Environmental factors influencing the seasonal daily activity of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in a Mediterranean area. Mammalia 57: 341–347.
• Wood D. H. 1988. Estimating rabbit density by counting dung pellets. Australian Wildlife Research 15: 665–671.
• Zar J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Third edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River New Jersey: 1–662.