PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2006 | 56 |

Tytuł artykułu

Pollen morphology of Polish species of genus Rubus - Part I. Rubus gracilis

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Pollen morphology and pollen variability of Rubus gracilis were studied. A total of 260 grains from 13 natural Polish localities were examined. Important characteristics include: a stretched bridge; a visible pore area and endopores; ectocolpi arranged regularly, more or less evenly spaced or, more rarely, joining one another in the apocolpium, long (79.3% length of the polar axis) and narrow; exine sculpture striate, distinct; striae and muri of equal width, rather narrow; striae usually running parallel to the polar axis, sometimes forming semicircles in the apocolpium zone; with distinct perforations. The size, outline and shape turned out to be poor criteria when identifying the species. A statistical analysis of 10 quantitative grain characteristics showed their little variability. The highest variability was found to occur in two traits connected with d (the distance between the apices of two ectocolpi). Statistical studies revealed no differences among the grains from the individual localities, likely the result of apomixis.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

56

Opis fizyczny

p.69-77,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • August Cieszkowski Agricultural University, Wojska Polskiego 71d, 60-625 Poznan, Poland
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • Caliński T., Kaczmarek Z. 1973. Metody kompleksowej analizy doświadczenia wielocechowego. Wydział V PAN i PTB, Warszawa–Wrocław.
  • Dobosz M. 2001. Wspomagana komputerowo-statystyczna analiza wyników badań. Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza. Exit, Warszawa.
  • Eide F. 1981 a. Key to the Northwest European Rosaceae Pollen. Grana 20: 101–118.
  • Eide F. 1981 b. On the pollen morphology of Rubus chamaemorus (Rosaceae). Grana 20: 25–27.
  • Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. An introduction to palynology 1. Almquist i Wiksell, Stockholm.
  • Erdtman G., Berglund B., Praglowski J. 1961. An Introduction to a Scandinavian Pollen Flora. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.
  • Faegri K., Iversen J. 1989. Textbook of pollen analysis. John Wiley and Sons. Chichister, 4th ed.
  • Fedoronchuk M.M., Savitsky V.D. 1987. Comparative and morphological analysis of pollen for genera of the family Rosaceae Juss. of the Ukrainian flora. Ukrainskij Botanichnij Zhurnal 44, 2: 32–38.
  • Halbritter H., Weber M., Zetter R., Frosch-Radivo A., Buchner R., Hesse M. 2005. PalDat – Illustrated Handbook on Pollen Terminology. Vienna.
  • Hebda R.J., Chinappa C.C., Smith B.M. 1988 a. Pollen morphology of the Rosaceae of Western Canada. I – Agrimonia to Crataegus. Grana 27: 95–113.
  • Hebda R.J., Chinappa C.C., Smith B.M. 1988 b. Pollen morphology of the Rosaceae of Western Canada. II – Dryas, Fragaria, Holodiscus. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 595–612.
  • Hebda R., Chinappa C.C. 1990. Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae in Canada. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 64: 103–108.
  • Huang T.C. 1972. Pollen flora of Taiwan. Botany Dept. Nat. Taiwan Univ. Taipei. Taiwan.
  • Ikuse M. 1965. General survey list of pollen grains in Japan (7). Rosales. Part 4. Journal of Japanese Botany 30: 365–368.
  • Karoński M., Caliński T. 1973. Grouping in multivariate populations on the basis of Euclidean distances. Algorytmical Biometrical Statystics 17: 117–129.
  • Kosenko V.N., Nguen T.H, Jacovlev G.P. 1982. Palynomorphological study of the representatives of the genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in the flora of Vietnam. Botanicheskij Zhurnal 69: 497–503.
  • Kuprianowa L.A., Alyoshina L.A. 1978. Pollen dicotyledonarum florae partis Europeae URSS. Lamiaceae-Zygophyllaceae. Academia Scientiarum USSR Nomine V. L. Komorovii Institutum Botanicum.
  • Moore P.D., Webb J.A., Collinson M.E. 1991. Pollen analysis. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.
  • Naruhashi N., Takano H. 1980. Size variation of pollen grains in some Rubus species. Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 28: 27–32.
  • Punt W., Blackmore S., Nilsson S., Le Thomas A. 1999. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology, http://www.bio.uu.nl/~palaeo/glossary/glosint.htm.
  • Reitsma T.J. 1966. Pollen morphology of some European Rosaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 15: 290–379.
  • Reitsma T.J. 1969. Size modification on recent pollen grains under different treatments. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 9: 175–202.
  • Reitsma T.J. 1970. Suggestions towards unification of descriptive terminology of angiosperm. Pollen grains. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 10: 39–60.
  • Stachurska A., Sadowska A., Kuszel T. 1974–1975. Kartoteka palynologiczna roślin polskich. Opolskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk. Zesz. 14–15, tab. 214–223.
  • Sudre H. 1917. Rubi Europae. Librairie des Sciences Naturelles, Paris.
  • Teppner H. 1965. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Waldsteinia L. Schlüssel zum Bestimmen von Rosaceen – Polleeinschliesslich ählicher Pollen formen aus andere Familien. Phyton 3–4: 224–238.
  • Tomlik-Wyremblewska A. 1995. Pollen morphology of genus Rubus L. Part I. Introductory studies of the European representatives of the subgenus Rubus L. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 64: 187–203.
  • Tomlik-Wyremblewska A. 2000. Pollen morphology of genus Rubus L. Part II. Introductory studies on the Malesian species of subgenus Micranthobatus Fritsch. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 69: 31–40.
  • Tomlik-Wyremblewska A., Van Der Ham R.W.J.M., Kosiński P. 2004. Pollen morphology of genus Rubus L. Part III. Studies on the Malesian species of subgenera Chamaebatus L. and Idaeobatus L. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 73: 207–227.
  • Weber H.E., 1995. Rubus L.W: Hegi G.: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Bd 4, Tl 2A. Red. H.E. Weber. Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin: 284–595.
  • Wrońska-Pilarek D. 1998. Pollen morphology of the Polish species of the genus Ribes L. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 67: 275–285.
  • Zhou L.H., Wei Z.X, Wu Z.Y. 1999. Pollen morphology of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) of China. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 21: 455–460.
  • Zieliński. J. 2001. Rubus L. In: A. Zając & M. Zając (eds). Distribution Atlas of vascular plants in Poland. Pracownia Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki UJ, Kraków.
  • Zieliński J. 2004. The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in Poland. Polish Botanical Studies 16: 1–300.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-46b95932-57e7-4f76-852c-88d9ceb9b04d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.