Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism in a captive population of juvenile striped skunks Mephitis mephitis

• Autorzy: Renard A. , Medill S.A. , Lariviere S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Three main hypotheses can explain the origin of the sexual size dimorphism: (1) the birth-size hypothesis, which states that birth size of males is larger than that of females; (2) the growth-rate hypothesis, which states that males grow faster than females; (3) the growth-length hypothesis, which states that males grow for a longer period of time than females. We examined the factors that may contribute to sexual size dimorphism with growth data of striped skunks Mephitis mephitis Schreber, 1776 held in captivity in Manitoba (Canada), from 7 to 72 days of age. At seven days of age, the mass of male skunks (mean = 79.7 g ± 13.9 SE, n = 37) was significantly larger than that of females (mean = 71.2 g ± 15.0 SE, n = 35) but the head and body length was not statistically different between males (mean = 110.3 mm ± 8.0 SE, n = 37) and females (mean = 95.3 mm ± 7.4 SE, n = 35). There was no difference in growth rate for mass or for length between sexes. We were not able to test for a difference in growth length between sexes. Our results suggest that mass dimorphism occurs early in life.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 54
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.243-248,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Renard A.

• Universite du Quebec a Rimouski, Rimouski [QC], Canada G5L 3A1

autor

Medill S.A.

autor

Lariviere S.

Bibliografia

• Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey: 1–624.
• Badyaev A. V. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 369–378.
• Ben-David M. 1998. Delayed implantation in the marbled polecat, Vormela peregusna syriaca (Carnivora, Mustelidae): evidence from mating, parturition, and post-natal growth. Mammalia 62: 269–283.
• Cabana G., Frewin A., Peters R. H. and Randall L. 1982. The effect of sexual dimorphism on variations in reproductive effort of birds and mammals. The American Naturalist 120: 17–25.
• Case T. J. 1978. On the evolution and adaptive significance of postnatal growth rates in the terrestrial vertebrates. The Quarterly Review of Biology 53: 243–282.
• Chilvers B. L., Robertson B. C., Wilkinson I. S. and Duignan P. J. 2007. Growth and survival of New Zealand sea lions, Phocartos hookeri: birth to 3 months. Polar Biology 30: 459–469.
• Clutton-Brock T. H. 1989. Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 236: 339–372.
• Creighton G. K. and Strauss R. E. 1986. Comparative patterns of growth and development in cricetine rodents and the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 40: 94–106.
• Fairbairn D. J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: patterns and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 659–687.
• Hedrick A. V. and Temeles E. J. 1989. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: hypotheses and tests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 136–138.
• Heidt G. A., Peterson M. K. and Kirkland G. L. Jr 1968. Mating behavior and development of the least weasels (Mustela nivalis) in captivity. Journal of Mammalogy 49: 413–419.
• Hwang Y. T., Larivière S. and Messier F. 2005. Evaluating body condition of striped skunks using non-invasive morphometric indices and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33: 195–203.
• Hwang Y. T., Larivière S. and Messier F. 2007a. Local and landscape level den selection of striped skunks on the Canadian prairies. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85: 33–39.
• Hwang Y. T., Larivière S. and Messier F. 2007b. Energetic consequences and ecological significance of heterothermy and social thermoregulation in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 80: 138–145.
• Isaac J. L. 2005. Potential causes and life-history consequences of sexual size dimorphism in mammals. Mammal Review 35: 101–115.
• Jarman P. 1983. Mating system and sexual dimorphism in large, terrestrial, mammalian herbivores. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 58: 485–520.
• King C. M. and Moody J. E. 1982. The biology of the stoat (Mustela erminea) in the national parks of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 9: 49–144.
• Larivière S., Hwang Y. T., Gorsuch W. A. and Medill S. A. 2005. Husbandry, over winter care and reproduction of captive striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Zoo Biology 24: 83–91.
• Larivière S. and Messier F. 1996. Immobilization of striped skunks with Telazol. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 713–716.
• Leigh S. R. and Shea B. T. 1995. Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes. American Journal of Primatology 36: 37–60.
• Loison A., Langvatn R. and Solberg E. J. 1999. Body mass and winter mortality in red deer calves: disentangling sex and climate effects. Ecography 22: 20–30.
• Miquelle D. G., Peek J. M. and Van Ballenberghe V. 1992. Sexual segregation in Alaskan moose. Wildlife Monograph 122: 1–57.
• Moors P. J. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in the body size of mustelids (Carnivora): the roles of food habits and breeding systems. Oikos 34: 147–158.
• Pérez-Barberia F. J. and Gordon I. J. 1999. Body size dimorphism and sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates: an experimental test with Soay sheep. Oecologia 120: 258–267.
• Pérez-Barberia F. J., Gordon I. J. and Pagel M. 2002. The origins of sexual dimorphism in body size in ungulates. Evolution 56: 1276–1285.
• Ralls K. 1977. Sexual dimorphism in mammals: avian models and unanswered questions. The American Naturalist 111: 917–938.
• Rosatte R. and Larivière S. 2003. Skunks (genera Mephitis, Spilogale, and Conepatus). [In: Wild mammals of North America. G. A. Feldhamer, B. C. Thompson and J. A. Chapman, eds]. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore: 692–707.
• Shine R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. The Quarterly Review of Biology 64: 419–461.
• Stamps J. and Krishnan V. V. 1997. Sexual bimaturation and sexual size dimorphism in animals with asymptotic growth after maturity. Evolutionary Ecology 11: 21–39.
• Taylor A. B. 1997. Relative growth, ontogeny, and sexual dimorphism in Gorilla gorilla gorilla and G. g. beringei: evolutionary and ecological considerations. American Journal of Primatology 43: 1–31.
• Trivers R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. [In: Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. B. Campbell, ed]. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago: 136–179.
• Verts B. J. 1967. The biology of the striped skunk. University of Illinois Press, Urbana: 1–218.
• Wade-Smith J. and Richmond M. E. 1975. Care, management, and biology of captive striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Laboratory Animal Science 25: 575–584.
• Wade-Smith J. and Verts B. J. 1982. Mephitis mephitis. Mammalian Species 173: 1–7.
• Weckerly F. W. 1998. Sexual-size dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 33–52.
• Wolfinger R. and Chang M. 1995. Comparing the SAS GLM and mixed procedures for repeated measures. SAS Institute Inc., Cary: 1–11.
• Zalewski A. 2007. Does size dimorphism reduce competition between sexes? The diet of male and female pine martens at local and wider geographical scales. Acta Theriologica 52: 237–250.