Immune cross reactions in carp [Cyprinus carpio L.] after single or double immunisation with Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas sobria antigens

• Autorzy: Kozinska A , Antychowicz J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of monovalent A.hydrophila and A. sobria vaccine on the induction of the protective immunity against the heterologous strains of Aeromonas genus in carp (C. carpio L.). Additionally, the level of immunity in carp after single and double vaccinations was compared. Separate groups of carp were immunised with 1S-95 (A.hydrophila) or 4R-96 (A.sobria) antigens by intrapesi to neal injection or by immersion. The immunisation efficiency was evaluated using challenge tests with various heterologous strains of Aeromonas genus. Carp revealed a partial immunity against the heterologous strains irrespective of the antigen kind and the route of vaccine administration. Fish immunised by immersion demonstrated a particularly high level of immunity. Antigen 1S-95 (A.hydrophila) protected more efficiently against another heterogenous strain of A.hydrophila than against A.sobria strain and vice versa. Double immunisation failed to increase the protective immunity as compared to that produced by a single immunisation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Aeromonas sobria; Aeromonas hydrophila; carp; antigen; Cyprinus carpio; fish disease; immunity; cross reaction; bacterial disease; bacteria; Aeromonas

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Puławy
• Rocznik: 2001
• Tom: 45
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.43-47

Twórcy

autor

Kozinska A

• National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Antychowicz J.

Bibliografia

• 1. Ellis A.E.: Fish vaccination. Academic Press Limited, London, 1988, p. 17.
• 2. Krausanagar I., Rosalind G., Krausanagar I.: Immunological response of the Indian major carps to Aeromonas hydrophila vaccine. J. Fish Dis., 1991, 14, 413-417.
• 3. Lamers C.H.J., De Haas M.J.M., Van Muiswinkel W.B.: The humoral response and memory formation in carp (Cyprinus carpio) after injection of Aeromonas hydrophila bacterin. Develop. Comp. Immunol., 1985, 9, 65-76.
• 4. Lamers C.H.J., De Haas M.J.M., Van Muiswinkel W.B.: The reaction of immune system of fish vaccination. Development of immunological memory in carp Cyprinus carpio following direct immersion in Aeromonas hydrophila bacterin. J. Fish Dis., 1985, 8, 253-262.
• 5. Newman S.G.: Bacterial vaccines for fish. Ann. Rev. Fish Diseases 1993, p.145.
• 6. Plumb J.A.: Immunisation of warm water fish against five important pathogens. In: Symposium of Fish Vaccination (cd. by P. de Kinkelin), Off. Int. des Epizoot., Paris, 1984, p. 199-222.
• 7. Popoff M.: Genus III Aeromonas. In: Krieg N.R., Holt J.G. (ed.): Bergey' s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol.1. Wiliams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1984, p.545.
• 8. Post G.: Response of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) to antigens of Aeromonas hydrophila. J. Fish Res. Board. Can., 1966, 23, 1487-1494.
• 9. Stevenson RM.W.: Vaccination against Aeromonas hydrophila. In: Ellis A.E.: Fish vaccination, Academic Press, London, 1988, p.112.
• 10. Thune R.L., Plumb J.A.: Effect of delivery method and antigen preparation in the production of antibodies against A.hydrophila in channel catfish. Progr. Fish Cult. 1982, 44, 53.