Vistula River valley as the ecological corridor for mammals

• Autorzy: Romanowski J
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

River Vistula, one of the large (1047 km in length) European rivers preserved in semi-natural, dynamic condition, is recognized as important corridor that enables birds and fishes to migrate for long distances. To test whether the Vistula valley provides corridor function also for mammals, field surveys and habitat modelling for six target species: Bank vole Myodes glareolus, Yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis, Pine marten Martes martes, Beaver Castor fiber, Wild boar Sus scrofa, and Elk Alces alces, were undertaken in the 135 km long fragment of the valley from 529 (Warsaw) to 685 km (Włocławek). The data collected documented the occurrence of at least 51 mammals (5 Insectivora, 14 Chiroptera, 1 Lagomorpha, 16 Rodentia, 11 Carnivora, 4 Artiodactyla), and the highest species richness was noted in the fragment of river valley covered with mixed forests which makes up the protected area called Kampinos National Park. This protected area (385 km²) contains coniferous and mixed forests, inland dunes, wetlands, and mosaic of extensively used meadows, pastures, alder forests and fields. The LARCH (Landscape Ecological Analysis and Rules for the Configuration of Habitat) (Van der Sluis and Romanowski 2005) model outputs indicated the potential for large viable populations of species analysed in the river valley. The LARCH SCAN analysis showed that habitats of modelled species were well connected and their local populations formed highly sustainable network. The spatial cohesion of habitats was generally highest in Kampinos NP and along the fragment of River Vistula from 580 to 618 km. It is concluded that high cohesion of habitats facilitates dispersion of animals and provides potential for gene flow among the populations in the valley. Riparian forests and islands are important for connecting the local populations of mammals of two river banks and are the key elements to provide functional continuity of the corridor along the river in places, where it is discontinued on one bank. The scenario analysis demonstrates potentially negative effects of river regulation and construction of two dams on viability of mammalian populations and spatial cohesion of their habitats. The future corridor function of the River Vistula valley depends mostly on preservation of it’s dynamic, semi-natural condition.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fish; bird; Vistula valley; mammal; riparian forest; modelling; Vistula River; dynamic condition; ecological corridor

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.805-819,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Romanowski J

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Dziekanow Lesny, 05-092 Lomianki, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adamczyk K., Chełkowska H., Walkowa W. 1988 – The community of rodents in environments of the suburban zone – Pol. Ecol. Stud. 14: 171–195.
• Andrzejewski R. 2003 – Small Insectivore mammals and rodents (In: Kampinoski Park Narodowy, tom I. [Kampinoski National Park, vol. I] Ed. R. Andrzejewski) – KPN, Izabelin, pp. 655–663. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Backiel T. 1995 – Ichtiofauna (In: Vistula as an Ecological Corridor. State – Functioning – Threats Ed. E. Gacka-Grzesikiewicz) – Fundacja IUCN Poland, Warszawa: 125–139. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Backiel T., Wiśniewolski W., Borzęcka I., Buras P., Szlakowski J., Woźniewski M. 2000 – The ichthyofauna of the Vistula between the confluence points with the Pilica and Narew – Dokumentacja geograficzna 19: 97–105. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Bajkiewicz-Grabowska E. 1993 – Hydrological problems of the Vistula river valley near Płock – Hydrobiologia 251: 159–165.
• Bennett A.F. 2003 – Linkages in the landscape: the role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation – World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, United Kingdom: 254 pp.
• Bukaciński D., Bukacińska M. 2001 – Threats to birds breeding along the middle Vistula river (In: Strategy for conservation of fauna in the Mazovian Lowland Eds: H. Kot and A. Dombrowski) – MTOF, Siedlce, pp. 117–126. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Chardon J.P., Foppen R.P.B., Geilen N. 2000 – LARCH-RIVER, a method to assess the functioning of rivers as ecological networks – Eur. Water Manage. 3: 35–43.
• Chylarecki P., Bukaciński D., Dombrowski A., Nowicki W. 1995 – Avifauna (In: Vistula as an Ecological Corridor. State – Functioning – Threats Ed. E. GackaGrzesikiewicz) – Fundacja IUCN Poland, Warszawa: 78–123. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Council Directive 1992 – Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Official Journal of the European Communities.
• Dawson D. 1994 – Are habitat corridors conduits for animals and plants in a fragmented landscape? A review of the scientific evidence – English Nature Research Report 94: 1–88.
• Décamps H., Pinay G., Naiman R., Petts G.E., McLain M.E., Hillbricht-Ilkowska A., Hanley T.A., Holmes R.M., Quinn J., Gibert J., Planty Tabacchi A., Schiemer F., Tabacchi E., Zalewski M. 2004 – Riparian zones: where biogeochemistry meets biodiversity in management practice – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 3–18.
• Forman R.T.T., Godron M. 1981 – Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology – BioSci. 31: 733–740.
• Gacka-Grzesikiewicz E., Bernat J., Jacewicz A., Matuszkiewicz J.M., Chylarecki P., Backiel T. 1995 – Vistula as an Ecological Corridor. State – Functioning – Threats. 10. Summary (Ed. E. Gacka-Grzesikiewicz) – Fundacja IUCN Poland, Warszawa: 155–165. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Głowaciński Z. 2001 – Red Data Book of Animals, Vertebrate – PWRiL, Warszawa, 452 pp. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Goszczyński J., Jabłoński P., Lesiński G., Romanowski J. 1993 – Variation in diet of Tawny Owl Strix aluco L. along an urbanization gradient – Acta orn. 27: 113–123.
• Goszczyński, J., Romanowski, J. 2000 – The mammals of the between-floodbanks area of the Middle Vistula Valley – Dokumentacja geograficzna 19: 107–117. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Groot Bruinderink G.W.T.A., Van der Sluis T., Lammertsma D.R., Opdam P. 2003 – The design of a tentative, coherent ecological network for large mammals in Northwest Europe – Conserv. Biol. 17: 549–557.
• Horskins K., Mather P.B., Wilson J.C. 2006 – Corridors and connectivity: when use and function do not equate – Landscape Ecol. 21: 641–655.
• Jędrzejewski W., Nowak S., Kurek R., Mysłajek R.W., Stachura K. 2004 – Zwierzęta a drogi. Metody ograniczenia negatywnego wpływu dróg na populacje dzikich zwierząt [Animals and roads. The methods to limit negative impact of roads on animal populations] – ZBS PAN, Białowieża, 84 pp. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Kajak Z. 1993 – The Vistula river and its riparian zones – Hydrobiologia 251: 149–157.
• Kowalski M., Misiak J., Reklewski J. 2003 – Mammals species introduced to the Kampinos Park (In: Kampinoski Park Narodowy, tom I. [Kampinoski National Park, vol. I] Ed. R. Andrzejewski) – KPN, Izabelin, pp. 675–684. (in Polish, with English summary).
• Kozakiewicz M. 1993 – Habitat isolation and ecological barriers – the effect on small mammal populations and communities – Acta theriol. 38: 1–30.
• Lesiński G., Fuszara E., Kowalski M. 2000 – Foraging areas and relative density of bats (Chiroptera) in differently transformed landscapes – Z. Säugetierkunde, 65:129–137.
• Lesiński G. 2003 – Chiroptera (In: Kampinoski Park Narodowy, tom I. [Kampinoski National Park, vol. I] Ed. R. Andrzejewski) – KPN, Izabelin, pp. 647–654. (in Polish, with English summary).
• Liro, A., Głowacka, I., Jakubowski, W., Kaftan, J., Matuszkiewicz A.J., Szacki, J. 1995 – National Ecological Network EECONET-Poland – Foundation IUCN Poland, Warsaw, 66 pp.
• Matuszkiewicz J., Romanowski J., Kowalska A., Kowalczyk K. 2005a – Description of the Vistula Valley (In: Evaluation of ecological consequences of development scenarios for the Vistula River Valley. Vistula Econet Development and Implementation VEDI Ed. T. Van der Sluis) – Warsaw, Wageningen, Utrecht, pp.13–24.
• Matuszkiewicz J., Kowalska A., Kozłowska A., Solon J. 2005b – Regional development scenarios (In: Evaluation of ecological consequences of development scenarios for the Vistula River Valley. Vistula Econet Development and Implementation VEDI Ed. T. Van der Sluis) – Warsaw, Wageningen, Utrecht pp. 25–34.
• Matuszkiewicz J., Solon J. 1998 – Charakterystyka zróżnicowania typologiczno-przestrzennego roślinności rzeczywistej oraz rozpoznanie specyficznych siedlisk i ekosystemów doliny Wisły. [Characteristics of spatial diversification of vegetation types and identification of specific habitats and ecosystems of the Vistula valley] – Institute of Geography PAN (unpublished ms., in Polish)
• Mazurkiewicz M., Rajska-Jurgiel E. 1998 – Spatial behaviour and population dynamics of woodland rodents – Acta theriol. 43: 137–161.
• Nowicki A., Kowalski M. 2003 – Hoof mammals of the Kampinos National Park (In: Kampinoski Park Narodowy, tom I. [Kampinoski National Park, vol. I] Ed. R. Andrzejewski) – KPN, Izabelin, pp. 665–673. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Pinowski J., Wesołowski T. 1983 – Influence of regulating Vistula River on avifauna – (In Ekologiczne podstawy zagospodarowania Wisły i jej dorzecza [Ecological foundations for management in the Vistula basin] Ed. Z. Kajak) PWN, Warszawa-Łódź, pp. 543–568. (in Polish, with English summary)
• Rajska-Jurgiel E., Mazurkiewicz M. 1988 – The effect of spatial structure of environment on density of rodents in suburban zone – Pol. ecol. Stud. 14: 145–169.
• Romanowski J. 1988 – Trophic Ecology of Asio otus (L.) and Athene noctua (Scop.) in the Suburbs of Warsaw – Pol. ecol. Stud. 14: 223–234.
• Romanowski J. 2006 – Monitoring of the Otter recolonisation of Poland – Hystrix Ital. J. Mamm. (n.s.) 17(1): 37–46.
• Romanowski J., Kowalczyk K., Rau K. 2008 – Population viability modelling of potential threats to the Beaver in the Vistula River Valley, Poland – Ann. Zool. Fenn. (in press)
• Simberloff D.S., Cox J. 1987 – Consequences and costs of conservation corridors – Cons. Biology 1: 63–71.
• Szacki J., Liro A. 1991 – Movements of small mammals in the heterogeneous landscape – Landscape Ecol. 5: 219–224.
• Van der Sluis T., Romanowski J. 2005 – Method of modelling (In: Evaluation of ecological consequences of development scenarios for the Vistula River Valley. Vistula Econet Development and Implementation VEDI Ed. T. Van der Sluis) – Warsaw, Wageningen, Utrecht pp. 35–42.
• Van der Sluis, T., Romanowski, J., Bouwma, I.M., Matuszkiewicz, J. 2007 – Comparison of scenarios for the Vistula river, Poland (In: Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas. Linking Man and Nature Systems. Eds S-K. Hong, N. Nakagoshi, B.J. Fu, Y. Morimoto) – Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 417–433.
• Verboom J., Foppen R., Chardon P., Opdam P., Luttikhuizen P. 2001 – Introducing the key patch approach for ecological networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds – Biol. Conserv. 100: 89–101.
• Ward J.V., Malard F., Tockner K. 2002 – Landscape ecology: a framework for integrating pattern and process in river corridors – Landscape Ecol. 17(Suppl.1): 35–45.
• WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) 2001 – A Study of a Comprehensive Solution to the Problems of the Włocławek Dam and Reservoir. Anticipated Social, Economic and Environmental Effects – Warsaw, 28 pp.