Mortality and reproductive patterns of wild European polecats Mustela putorius in Denmark

• Autorzy: Kristiansen L. V. , Sunde P. , Nachman G. , Madsen A.B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Despite its relative abundance and wide geographical range, the population dynamics and reproductive biology of the European polecatMustela putorius Linnaeus, 1758 are largely unknown as to the wild living. We therefore investigated age and reproductive status of 239 Danish polecats primarily killed in traffic or trapped during 1998–2004. Males comprised two third of all individuals in all age groups. Based on a static life table, apparent annual mortality was 68% during the first year of life, 33% during the second year and 65% from the third year in both sexes. The mean (± SE) litter size of 5.95 ± 0.62 (n = 18), estimated from placental scar counts, was significantly lower than litter sizes at birth reported for captive individuals but consistent with litter sizes reported for wild polecats in Russia. Female yearlings conceived at the same rate and produced litters of the same size as older individuals.Males had spermatozoa in their testes from February through August. Testes mass peaked in April and May, ie the same period when most females conceive. A lower prevalence of individuals with spermatozoa in yearlings suggests that most males postponed sexual maturity to two years of age.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 52
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.371-378,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kristiansen L. V.

• University of Copenhagen, Universitets- parken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

autor

Sunde P.

autor

Nachman G.

autor

Madsen A.B.

Bibliografia

• Ansorge H. and Suchentrunk F. 2001. Aging steppe polecats (Mustela eversmanni) and polecats (Mustela putorius) by canine cementum layers and skull characters. Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen Niederösterreichisches Landesmuseum 14: 79–106.
• Asferg T. 2002. [Danish game bag record for the 2000/2001 hunting season]. NERI Technical Report no. 393. The National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark: 1–36. [In Danish with English summary. Available at: http://​www2.​dmu.​dk/​1_​viden/​2_​Publikationer/​3_​fagrapp orter/rapporter/FR393.pdf].
• Baghli A. and Verhagen R. 2004. Home range and movement patterns in a vulnerable polecatMustela putorius population. Acta Theriologica 49: 247–258.
• Buchalczyk T. and Ruprecht A. L. 1977. Skull variability ofMustela putorius Linnaeus 1758. Acta Theriologica 22: 87–120.
• Byrom A. E. 2002. Dispersal and survival of juvenile ferretsMustela furo in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 67–78.
• Caley P., McElrea L. M. and Hone J. 2002. Mortality rates of feral ferrets (Mustela furo) in New Zealand. Wildlife Research 29: 323–328.
• Caughley G. 1966. Mortality patterns in mammals. Ecology 47: 906–918.
• Caughley G. 1977. Analysis of vertebrate populations. John Wiley and Sons, London: 1–234.
• Danilow P. I. and Rusakov S. 1969. Peculiarities of the ecology ofMustela putorius in north-west district of the European part of USSR. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 48: 1383–1394.
• Elmeros M. and Hammershøj, M. 2006. Experimental evaluation of the reliability of placental scar counts in American mink (Mustela vison). European Journal of Wildlife Research 52: 132–135.
• Elmeros M. and Madsen A. B. 1999. On the reproduction biology of otters (Lutra lutra) from Denmark. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 64: 193–200.
• Frost H. C., Krohn W. B. and Wallace C. R. 1997. Age-specific reproductive characteristics in fishers. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 598–612.
• Grue H. and Jensen B. 1979. Review of the formation of incremental lines in tooth cementum of terrestrial mammals. Danish Review of Game Biology 11: 1–48.
• Hammershøj M., Thomse E. A. and Madsen A. B. 2004. Diet of free-ranging American mink and European polecat in Denmark. Acta Theriologica 49: 337–347.
• Hammond J. and Marshall F. H. A. 1930. Estrus and pseudo-pregnancy in the ferret. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 105: 607–634.
• Hauer S., Ansorge H. and Zinke O. 2002. Reproductive performance of ottersLutra lutra (Linnaeus, 1758) in Eastern Germany: low reproduction in a long-term strategy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77: 329–340.
• King C. M. 2002. Cohort variation in the life-history parameters of stoatsMustela erminea in relation to fluctuating food resources: a challenge to boreal ecologists. Acta Theriologica 47: 225–244.
• Lagerkvist G. 1992. Reproductive features in the ferret (Mustela putorius). [In: Reproduction in carnivorous furbearing animals. A. H. Tausons, and M. Valtonen, eds]. NJF- Udredning/rapport 75. Jordbrugsforlaget, Copenhagen: 87–95.
• Lodé T. 2001. Mating system and genetic variance in a polygynous mustelid, the European polecat. Genes and Genetic Systems. 76: 221–227.
• McDonald R. A. and Harris S. 2002. Population biology of stoatsMustela erminea and weaselsMustela nivalis on game estates in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 793–805.
• Mead R. A., Neirinckx S. and Czekala N. M. 1990. Reproductive cycle of the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni). Journals of Reproduction and Fertility Ltd. 88: 353–360.
• Moors P. J. and Lavers R. B. 1981. Movements and home range of ferrets (Mustela furo) at Pukepuke Lagoon, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 8: 413–423.
• Powell R. A. and King C. M. 1997. Variation in body size, sexual dimorphism and age-specific survival in stoats,Mustela erminea (Mammalia: Carnivora), with fluctuating food supplies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 165–194.
• Rondini C., Ercoli V. and Boitani L. 2006. Habitat use and preference by polecats (Mustela putorius L.) in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape. Journal of Zoology 269: 213–219.
• Stearns S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York: 1–249.
• Sundell J. 2003. Reproduction of the least weasel in captivity: basic observations and the influence of food availability. Acta Theriologica 48: 59–72.
• Vandermeer H. J. and Goldberg D. E. 2003. Population ecology, first principles. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford: 1–280.
• Wolf K. N., Wildt D. E., Vargas A., Marinari P. E., Ottinger M. A. and Howard J. G. 2000. Reproductive inefficiency in male black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). Zoo Biology 19: 517–528.
• Wolsan M. 1993.Mustela putorius Linnaeus, 1758 — Waldiltis. [In: Handbuch der Söugetiere Europas. Band 5. J. Niethammer and F. Krapp, eds]. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden: 770–816.