PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2009 | 78 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Biosystematic studies of Elymus repens [L.] Gould [Poaceae]: patterns of phenotypic variation

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Inter- and intrapopulational morphological variability of Elymus repens, a cool-season peren-nial grass and a tenacious weed that spreads both by seeds and rhizomes forming a thick and stout net, was examined. Multivariate statistical analysis of 48 initial morphological characters obtained from 44 population samples (1180 specimens) collected in different habitats revealed the conspicuous variation within E. repens. Principal Component Analysis revealed three extremes of the morphological gradient that were referred to as three varieties of E. repens: var. repens, var. aristatus and var. subulatus, not correlated with the habitat type or geographi-cal location. Canonical Discriminant Analysis proved the taxonomic usefulness of characters such as awned or awnless glumes and lemmas as well as the shape of glumes for variety di-stinction. Results of morphological analysis, in relation to the low level of genetic variation showed in the previous studies, suggest that the extensive morphological variation of E. re-pens can be caused by its plasticity where different morphological patterns are realized on the same genome basis. Additionally, the open-pollinated system of mating results in new combi-nations of morphological characters of plants that further reproduce vegetatively by rhizomes. The nomenclature, taxonomic descriptions and a key to the three varieties are provided.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

78

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.51-61,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 42, 31-512 Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

  • BOWDEN W.M. 1965. Cytotaxonomy of the species and interspecific hybrids of the genus Agropyron in Canada and neighbouring areas. Can. J. Bot. 43: 1421-1448.
  • BREJ T. 2001. Ecological significance of assimilate distribution in Agropyron repens clones under influence of the copper smelter Legnica. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2: 145-151.
  • CONERT H.J. (ed.). 1998. Gustav Hegi Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Spermatophyta: Angiospermae: Monocotyledo- nes 1 (2), Poaceae. Band I, teil 3. Parey Buchverlag, Berlin, 928 pp.
  • CORRADINI P., EDELIN C., BRUNEAU A., BOUCHARD A. 2002. Architectural and genotypic variation in the clonal shrub Taxus canadensis as determined from random amplified polymorphic DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism. Can. J. Bot. 80: 205-219.
  • DAVIES C.E., MOSS D., HILL M.O. 2004. EUNIS habitat classification revised 2004. Report to the European Environment Agency, European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, 311 pp.
  • DU RIETZ G.E. 1930. The fundamental units of biological taxonomy. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 24: 333-428.
  • FALKOWSKI M. (ed.). 1982. Trawy polskie (Polish grasses). Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Lesne, Warszawa, 565 pp. (in Polish).
  • FERNALD M.L. 1933. Recent discoveries in the Newfoundland flora. Rhodora 35: 167-185.
  • GRUNDT H.H., BORGEN, L., ELVEN R. 2001. Infraspecific variation in Cerastium alpinum s. lat. (Caryophyllaceae) in Central Norway. Nord. J. Bot. 20: 641-653.
  • HAMILTON C.W., REICHARD S.H. 1992. Current practice in the use of subspecies, variety, and forma in the classification of wild plants. Taxon 41 (3): 485-498.
  • HANSEN A. 1959. Die Elytrigia-Arten und -Hybriden an der polnischen Ostseeküste. Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 5 (2): 182-189.
  • HOLM L.G., PLUCKNETT D.L., PANCHO, J.V., HERBERGER J.P. 1977. The world’s worst weeds: distribution and biology. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, 609 pp.
  • HULTEN E., FRIES M. 1986. Atlas of North European vascular plants. North of the Tropic of Cancer. 1. 498 pp.; 3. 1172 pp. Koelz Scientific Books, Königstein.
  • KENDALL M.G. 1975. Rank correlation methods. 4th Ed. Charles Griffin, London, 202 pp.
  • KONDRACKI J. 1981. Geografia fizyczna Polski (Physical geography of Poland). PWN, Warszawa, 463 pp. (in Polish).
  • KOSINA R. 1995. Comments on the variation of spike morphology in selected species of Elytrigia and Elymus (Triticeae). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 64 (4): 385-392.
  • LÖVE A. 1984. Conspectus of the Triticeae. Feddes Repert. 95 (7-8): 425-521.
  • MAHELKA V., FEHRER J., KRAHULEC F., JAROLiMOVA V. 2007. Recent natural hybridization between two allopolyploid wheatgrass (Elytrigia, Poaceae): ecological and evolutionary implications. Ann. Bot. 100 (2): 249-260.
  • MASON-GAMER R.J. 2004. Reticulate evolution, introgression, and intertribal gene capture in allohexaploid grass. Syst. Biol. 53 (1): 25-37.
  • MATUSZKIEWICZ W. 2005. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Wyd. 3. (A guide to identification of plant communities of Poland. 3rd Ed.). PWN, Warszawa, 537 pp. (in Polish).
  • MELDERIS A. 1978. Taxonomic notes on the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae), with special reference to the genera Elymus L. sensu lato, and Agropyron Gaertner sensu lato. In: Flora Euro- paea Notulae Systematicae ad Floram European spectantes No. 20. Heywood V.H. (ed.). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 76 (4): 369-384.
  • MELDERIS A. 1980. Elymus L. In: Flora Europaea. 5. Alismata- ceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M., Webb D.A. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 192-198.
  • MIREK Z., MUSIAŁ L., WÓJCICKI J.J. 1997. Polish herbaria. Polish Bot. Stud. Guideb. Ser. 18: 1-116.
  • MIZIANTY M., FREY L., SZCZEPANIAK M. 2001. The Agro- pyron-Elymus complex (Poaceae) in Poland: biosystematics. In: Studies on grasess in Poland. Frey L. (ed.). W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, pp. 25-77.
  • PROKUDIN YU.N. 1982. The results of composite biosystematical study of Elytrigia repens (Poaceae). Bot. Zhurn. 67 (2): 129-139. (in Russian with English summary).
  • ROSTAFIŃSKI J. 1873 (“1872”). Florae polonicae prodromus. Verh. k. k. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien.: 81-208.
  • ROTHMALER W. 1994. Excursionsflora von Deutschland. Band 4. G. Fischer Verlag, Jena-Stuttgart, 811 pp.
  • ROYSTON J.P. 1982. An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. App. Statistics 31: 115-124.
  • RUTKOWSKI L. 1998. Klucz do oznaczania roślin naczyniowych Polski niżowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 812 pp. (in Polish).
  • SCHOLZ H. 1993. Elytrigia arenosa (Gramineae) - ein mitteleuropäischer Relikt-Endemit. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 115 (3): 351-366.
  • SINGH D.N. 1964. Cytological studies in the Gramineae. III. Sci. and Cult. 30 (8): 396-397.
  • SNEATH P.H., SOKAL R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, xv + 573 pp.
  • SNEDECOR G.W. 1956. Statistical methods. 5th Ed. Iowa University Press, Ames, 267 pp.
  • STACE C.A. 1989. Plant Taxonomy and Biosystematics. 2nd Ed. Chapman and Hall Inc., New York, 264 pp.
  • STATSOFT, INC. 2007. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 8.0. www.statsoft.com.
  • SZABÓ A.T. 1979. Wheatgrass variability (Agropyron, sect. Ely- trigia) in a native collection from Transylvania, Romania. I. Agropyron intermedium complex. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca Inst. Agron. “Dr. Petru Groza” 10: 89-99.
  • SZABÓ A.T. 1981. Wheatgrass variability (Agropyron, sect. Ely- trigia) in a native collection from Transylvania. II. Agropyron repens (L.) P. Beauv. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca Inst. Agron. “Dr. Petru Groza” 11: 61-68.
  • SZAFER W. 1919. Rodzina Gramineae, Trawy (Family Gramine- ae, Grasses). In: Flora polska. Rośliny naczyniowe Polski i ziem ościennych. 1. Paprotniki, iglaste i jednoliścienne (Polish flora. Vascular plants of Poland and adjacent territories. 1. Pteridophyta, Coniferae and Monocotyledones). Raciborski M., Szafer W. (eds). Akademia Umiejętności, Kraków, pp. 230-365. (in Polish).
  • SZCZEPANIAK M. 2002a. Morphological variability of Polish populations of Elymus repens from various habitats - preliminary report. Ecol. Questions 2: 159-168.
  • SZCZEPANIAK M. 2002b. Biosystematyka Elymus repens (L.) Gould i Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis w Polsce (Biosyste- matics of Elymus repens (L.) Gould and Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis in Poland). PhD thesis, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland, 181 pp. (in Polish).
  • SZCZEPANIAK M., CIEŚLAK E. 2003. Assessment of genetic variation in Elymus repens and E. hispidus using AFLP markers and its implications for intraspecific taxonomy. In: Problems of grass biology. Frey L. (ed.). W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, pp. 271-286.
  • SZCZEPANIAK M., CIEŚLAK E., BEDNAREK P.T. 2002. Morphological and AFLP variation of Elymus repens (L.) Gould (Poaceae). Cell. Mol. Biol. Letters 7 (2A): 547-558.
  • SZCZEPANIAK M., CIEŚLAK E., BEDNAREK P.T. 2007. Natural hybridization between Elymus repens and Elymus hispidus assessed by AFLP analysis. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 76 (3): 225-234.
  • SZCZEPANIAK M., BIENIEK W., BOROŃ P., SZKLARCZYK M., MIZIANTY M. 2009. A contribution to characterization of genetic variation in some natural Polish populations of Elymus repens (L.) Gould and Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis (Poaceae) as revealed by RAPD markers. Pl. Biol. 11: (Accepted). DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00171.x
  • TAYLOR D.R., AARSSEN L.W. 1988. An interpretation of phenotypic plasticity in Agropyron repens (Gramineae). Amer. J. Bot. 75(3): 401-413.
  • TSVELEV N.N. 1979. On some species of Koeleria Pers. and the origin of Koeleria grandis Bess. ex Gorski (Poaceae). Bot. Zhurn. 64: 985-988. (in Russian with English summary).
  • TSVELEV N.N. 1984. Grasses of the Soviet Union. Part 1. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 568 pp.
  • ZAJĄC A., ZAJĄC M. (eds). 2001. Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce. Distribution Atlas of Vascular Plants in Poland. Edited by Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, 714 pp. (in Polish with English summary).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-265bf4db-c1b0-442f-9000-30c14098675a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.