Reakcje obronne i odpornosc roslin zywicielskich na szpeciele [Acari: Eriophyoidea]

• Autorzy: Kozlowski J
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Some plants own the mechanism protecting them against the infestation of the eriophyoid mites or rendering quick regeneration of injuries caused by mites possible. The specific morphological or chemical features preventing the establishment or limiting the colonization of mites and their feeding play an important role in this mechanism. The eriophyoid feeding induces the wide diversity of host plants' defensive responses. The infested plant sets in motion a series of biochemical, physiological and morphological processes that either limit the development and activity of mites or decrease the losses caused by their feeding. This work presents the examples of the defensive responses and the plant resistance to the infestation and feeding of mites and the plant-mite-plant interactions.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

odpornosc nabyta; Acari; szkodniki roslin; odpornosc roslin; reakcje obronne; szpeciele; rosliny zywicielskie; odpornosc wrodzona

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2002
• Tom: 49
• Numer: 5
• Opis fizyczny: s.65-76,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kozlowski J

• Instytut Ochrony Roslin, ul.Miczurina 20, 60-318 Poznan

Bibliografia

• [1] Aist J.R. 1976. Papillae and related wound plugs of plant cells. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 14: 145-163.
• [2] Albrigo L.G., McCoy C. W. 1974. Characteristic injury by citrus rust mite to orange leaves and fruit. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 87: 48-54.
• [3] Andersen P.C., Mizell R.F. 1987. Impact of the peach silver mite, Aculus cornutus (Acari: Eriophyidae), on leaf gas exchange of Flordaking' and 'June Gold' peach trees. Environ. Entomol. 16: 660-663.
• [4] Anderson M.M. 1971. Resistance to gall mite (Phytoptus ribis NAL.) in the Eucoresoma section of Ribes. Euphytica 20: 422-426.
• [5] Benhamon N., Theriault G. 1992. Treatment with chitosan enhances resistance of tomato plants to the crown and root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Radicis-lycopersici. Physiol. Molec. Plant Path. 41: 33-52.
• [6] Boczek J. 1999. Zarys akarologii rolniczej. Podręcznik dla studiujących ochronę roślin. Wyd. Nauk. PWN: 358 ss.
• [7] Bronner R., Westphal E., Dreger F. 1989. Chitosan, a component of the compatible interaction between Solanum dulcamara L. and the gall mite Eriophyes cladophthirus NAL. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 34: 117-130.
• [8] Bronner R., Westphal E., Dreger F. 1991. Phatogenesis-related proteins in Solanum dulcamara L. resistant to the gall mite, Aceria cladophthirus NALEPA (syn. Eriophyes cladophthirus NAL.). Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 38: 93-104.
• [9] Bronner R., Westphal E., Dreger F. 1991. Enhanced peroxidase activity associated with the hypersensitive response of Solanum dulcamara to the gall mite Aceria cladophthirus (Acarina: Eriophyoidea). Can. J. Bot. 69: 2192-2196.
• [10] Daly J.M. 1983. Current concepts of disease resistance in plants. W: Kommendahl T. and Williams P.M. (Red.), Challenging problems in plant health. Am. Phyt. Soc., St Paul, USA: 311-323.
• [11] Dąbrowski Z.T. 1988. Podstawy odporności roślin na szkodniki. PWRiL: 260 ss.
• [12] DixonR.A., Harrison M.J., Lamb C.J. 1994. Early events in the activation of plant defense responses. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 32: 479-501.
• [13] Easterbrook M.A., Fuller M.M. 1986. Russeting of apples caused by apple rust mite Aculus schlechtendali (Acarina: Eriophyidae). Ann. Appl. Biol. 109: 1-9.
• [14] Gibson R.W. 1974. Studies on the feeding behaviour of the eriophyid mite Abacarus hystrix, a vector of grass viruses. Ann. Appl. Biol. 78: 213-217.
• [15] Harris M.K., Frederiksen R.A. 1984. Concepts and methods regarding host plant resistance to arthropods and pathogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 22: 247-272.
• [16] Hirano S., Nago N. 1989. Effects of chitosan pectic acid, lysozyme, and chitinase on the growth of several phytopathogens. Agic. Biol. Chem. 53: 3065-3066.
• [17] Jeppson L.R., Keifer H.H., Baker E.W. 1975. Mites injurious to economic plants. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, California, USA: 614 ss.
• [18] Karban R., English-Loeb G.M. 1988. Effects of herbivory and plant conditioning on the population dynamics of spider mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 4: 225-246.
• [19] Knight R.L., Keep E., Briggs J.B., Parker J.H. 1974. Transference of resistance to black-currant gall mite Cecidophyopsis ribis from grooseberry to black currant. Ann. Appl. Biol. 76: 123-130.
• [20] Kozłowski J. 1998. Czynniki warunkujące wrażliwość odmian jabłoni i reakcja odmian na pordzewiacza jabłoniowego - Aculus schlechtendali (NALEPA). Rozpr. Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin. Poznań, 2: 119 ss.
• [21] Kozłowski J., Kozłowska M. 1997. The influence of feeding of the apple rust mite Aculus schlechtendali (NAL.) (Acarina: Eriophyidae) on biochemical changes in leaves of different apple cultivars. J. Plant Protection Res. 37(1/2): 67-71.
• [22] Kozłowski J., Tomczyk M., Kozłowska M. 1991. Impact of feeding by apple rust mite Aculus schlechtendali (NAL.) (Acarina: Eriophyoidea) on some physiological processes of apple - tree leaves. Prace Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin 32(1/2): 73-84.
• [23] Kozłowski J., Zielińska L. 1997. Cytological changes in apple leaves infested with the apple rust mite - Aculus schlechtendali (NAL.) (Acarina: Eriophyidae). J. Plant Protection Res. 37(1/1): 72-84.
• [24] Lindquist E.E., Oldfield G.N. 1996. Evolution eriophyoid mites in relation to their host plants. W: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M. W. and Bruin J. (Red.), Eriophyoid mites - Their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier Science Publ., Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 277-300.
• [25] Malcenkova N.J., Cubinisvili C.V. 1980. Akarokompleks vinogradnoj lozy. Akad. Nauk Moldav. SSR, Kisinev: 101 ss.
• [26] Noris D.M., Kogan M. 1990. Biochemical and morphological bases of resistance. W: Maxwell F.G., Jennings P.R. (red.), Breeding plants resistant to insects. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA: 23-61.
• [27] Painter H.H. 1968. Insect resistance. The University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, USA: 520 ss.
• [28] Pospieszny H., Chirkov S., Atabekov J.G. 1991. Induction of antiviral resistance in plants by chitosan. Plant Sci. 79: 64-68.
• [29] Rajagopal K., Jayaraj S., Subramanium T.R. 1970. Physiological mechanism of resistance injasmine to blister mite Aceria jasminii C. (Eriophyidae: Acarina). Indian J. Exp. Biol. 8: 44-47.
• [30] Royalty R.N., Perring T.M. 1988. Morphological analysis of damage to tomato leaflets by tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 81: 816-820.
• [31] Royalty R.N., Perring T.M. 1996. Nature of damage and its assessment. W: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. and Bruin J. (red.), Eriophyoid mites -their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier Science Publ., Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 493-512.
• [32] Thresh J.M. 1967. Increased susceptibility of black currant bushes to the gall-mite vector (Phytoptus ribis NAL.) following infection with reversion virus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 60: 455-467.
• [33] Tomczyk A., Kropczyńska D., Kiełkiewicz M. 1987. Przejawy odporności na przędziorki u roślin uprawnych. Mat. 27 Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin 1: 65-79.
• [34] Westphal E. 1980. Responses of some Solanaceae to attack by the gall mite Eriophyes cladophthirus. Plant Disease 64: 406-409.
• [35] Westphal E., Bronner R., Le Ret M. 1981. Changes in leaves of susceptible and resistant Solanum dulcamara infested by the gall mite Eriophyes cladophthirus (Acarina: Eriophyoidea). Can. J. Bot. 59: 875-882.
• [36] Westphal E., Dreger F., Brenner R. 1990. The gall mite Acaria cladophthirus (NALEPA). I. Life cycle, survival outside the gall and symptoms expression on susceptible and resistant Solanum dulcamara L. plants. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 9: 183-200.
• [37] Westphal E., Manson D.C.M. 1996. Feeding effects on host plants: gall formation and other distortions. W: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M. W. and Brum J. (Red.), Eriophyoid mites - Their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier Science Publ., Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 231-242.
• [38] Zawadzki W. 1975. Wstępne obserwacje nad szkodliwością szpeciela pordzewiacza śliwowego Aculus fockeui (NAL., TRT.). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 171: 157-166.