Interaction of ESR1 gene with the FSHB and MYOG genes: effect on the reproduction and growth in pigs

• Autorzy: Humpolicek P , Tvrdon Z. , Urban T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Interakcja genu ESR1 z genami FSHB i MYOG: wplyw na wybrane cechy rozrodu i wzrost swin

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study aimed at determining whether the combination of three selected genes can be used for selection in small populations of pigs. The estrogen receptor (ESR1), follicle stimulating hormone (FSHB) and porcine myogenin (MYOG) genes were selected to detect their combined effect. Although over the last decades considerable progress in pig production was achieved, reproduction in his species still remains unsatisfactory. The marker-assisted selection (MAS) is considered to bring progress in pig reproduction. If MAS is to be used efficiently, the complexity of reproduction process should be taken into consideration. The effects were studied of interaction between the mentioned three genes and selected production and reproduction traits of pigs. Interactions between the effects of particular gene markers are important because of possible negative effect(s) of a single-path selection as well as possible co-selection. No significant interaction between the effects of genes studied was found. It is concluded that in small populations co-selection is effective only when highly significant effects of selected auxiliary genes occur.

PL

Aczkolwiek na przestrzeni ostatnich lat zarysował się znaczny postęp w produkcji trzody chlewnej,to jednak tempo reprodukcji tego gatunku należy uznać za niewystarczające. Badania zmierzały do twierdzenia, czy kombinacja wybranych genów może znaleźć zastosowanie w selekcji małych populacji trzody chlewnej. Opierając się na wynikach prac wcześniejszych, których wyniki świadczyły o istnieniu zależności między konkretnymi genami a cechami produkcji i reprodukcji świń, do badań wybrano geny ESR1, FSHB i MYOG. W przypadku selekcji wspomaganej markerami (marker-assisted selection) interakcje między efektami konkretnych genów mogą być ważne i przydatne wobec zagrożenia uzyskaniem ujemnego wyniku w przypadku pojedynczej ścieżki selekcyjnej lub koselekcji. Poza dwoma mało przekonującymi przypadkami nie stwierdzono istotności poszukiwanych interakcji. Autorzy wnioskują,że w małych populacjach koselekcja może być skuteczna wyłącznie wtedy, gdy efekt wybranych genów „wspomagających” jest wysoce istotny.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ESR1 gene; animal genetics; FSHB gene; growth rate; gene effect; pig; MYOG gene; marker-assisted selection; growth; reproduction; interaction

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Animal Science Papers and Reports
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 27
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.105-113,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Humpolicek P

• Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Nam.T.G.Masaryka 5555, Czech Republic

autor

Tvrdon Z.

autor

Urban T.

Bibliografia

• CASSADY J.P., JOHNSON R.K., POMP D., ROHRER G.A., VAN VLECK L.D., SPIEGEL E.K., GILSON K.M., 2001 – Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting reproduction in pigs.Journal of Animal Science 79, 623-633.
• CIESLAK D., KAPELANSKI W., BLICHARSKI T., PIERZCHALA M., 2000 – Restriction fragment length polymorphism in MYOGenin and MYF-3 genes and their influence on lean meat content in pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 117, 43-55.
• DEPUYDT J., DE SMET S., GRIJSPEERDT K., HERMAN L., 1999 – Association study of an AvaI and PvuII poly-morphism at the porcine estrogen receptor ESR1 gene with litter size. Archiv fuer Tierzucht 42, 172-174.
• DROEGEMUELLER C., HAMANN H., THIEVEN U., KRIETER J., DISTL O., HARLIZIUS B.,1999 – Influence of the genome region surrounding the estrogen receptor (ESR1) gene on litter size in a German Landrace population. Archiv fuer Tierzucht Special Issue, 175-177.
• EDMONDSON D.G., OLSON E.N., 1999 – A gene with homology to the myc similarity region of MyoD1 is expressed during MYOGenesis and is sufficient to activate the muscle differentiation program. Genes and Development 3, 628-640.
• GIBSON J.P., JIANG Z.H., ROBINSON J.A.B., ARCHIBALD A.L., HALEY C.S., 2002 – No detectable association of the ESR1 PvuII mutation with sow productivity in a Meishan×Large White F2 population. Animal Genetics 33, 448-450.
• Groeneveld E., Kovac S M., Wang T., 1990 – PEST, a general purpose BLUP package for multivariate prediction and estimation. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vol. XIII. Edinburgh, 488-91.
• GOLIÁŠOVÁ E., WOLF J., 2004 – Impact of the ESR1 gene on litter size and reproduction traits in Czech Large White pigs. Animal Genetics 35, 399-412.
• HÄNDEL S.E., STICKLAND N.C., 1988 – Catch-up growth in pigs: relationship with muszle cellularity. Animal Production 47, 291-295.
• Hayes B., Goddard M.E., 2003 – Evaluation of marker assisted selection in pig enterprises.Livestock Production Science 81, 197-211.
• HOROGH G., ZSOLNAI A., KOMLO´SI I., NYÍRI A., ANTON I., FE SÜS L., 2004 – Estrogen receptor genotypes and litter size in Hungarian Large White pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 122, 56-61.
• Humpolíček P., Urban T., Matoušek V., Tvrdoň Z., 2007 – Effect of the estrogen receptor,the follicle stimulating hormone and the myogenin genes on the Large White Sows´ Performances. Czech Journal of Animal Science 52, 334-340.
• ISLER B.J., IRVIN K.M., NEAL S.M., MOELLER S.J., DAVIS M.E., 2002 – Examination of the relationship between the estrogen receptor gene and reproductive traits in swine. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2334-2339.
• KNOLL A., NEBOLA M., DVOŘÁK J., ČEPICA S., 1997 – Detection of a DdeI PCR-RFLP within intron 1 of the porcine MYOD1 (MYF3) locus. Animal Genetics 28, 321.
• LINVILLE R.C., POMP D., JOHNSON R.K., ROTHSCHILD M.F., 2001 – Candidate gene analysis for loci affecting litter size and ovulation rate in swine. Journal of Animal Science 79,60-67.
• LI N., ZHAO Y.F., XIAO L., ZHANG F.J., CHEN Y.Z., DAI R.J., ZHANG J.S., SHEN S.Q., CHEN Y.F., WU C.X., 1998 – Candidate gene approach for identification of genetic loci controlling litter size in swine. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Armidale. Australia. January 11-16. vol. 26, 183-186.
• LINVILLE R.C., POMP D., JOHNSON R.K., ROTHSCHILD M.F., 2001 – Candidate gene analysis for loci affecting litter size and ovulation rate in swine. Journal of Animal Science. 79,60-67.
• MANNAERTZ B., UILENBROCK J., SCHOT P., DE LEEUW R., 1994 – Folliculogenesis In hypophesectomized rats after treatment with recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone.Biology of Reproduction 51, 72-81.
• MELLINK C., LAHBIB-MANSAIS Y., YERLE M., GELLIN J., 1995 – PCR amplification and physical localization of the genes for pig FSHβ and LHβ. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 70, 224-227.
• NILSSON S., MÄKELÄ S., TREUTER E., TUJAGUE M., THOMSEN J., ANDERSSON G.,ENMARK E., PETTERSSON K., WARNNER M., GUSTAFSSON J., 2001 – Mechanisms of Estrogen action. Physiological Review 81, 1536-1565.
• Rohrer G.A., Alexander L.J., Beattie C.W., 1994 – Mapping the beta subunit of follicle stimulating hormone (FSHB) in the porcine genome. Mammalian Genome 5, 315-317.
• ROTHSCHILD M.F., JACOBSON C., VASKE D.A., 1996 – The estrogen receptor locus is associated with a major gene influencing litter size in pigs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93, 201-205.
• ROTHSCHILD M.F., LARSSON R.G., JACOBSON C., PEARSON P., 1991 – PvuII polymorphisms at the porcine receptor locus ESR1. Animal Genetics 22, 448.
• Short T.H., Roths Child M.F., Southwood O.I., McLaren D.G., De Vries A., Van Der Steen H., Eckardt G.R., Tuggle C.K., Helm J., Vaske D.A., Mileham A.J.,Plastow G.S., 1997 – Effect of the estrogen receptor locus on reproduction and production traits in four commercial pig Lines. Journal of Animal Science 75, 3138-3142
• STRATIL A., ČEPICA S., 1999 – Three polymorphisms in the porcine MYOGenin factor 5 (MYF5)gene detected by PCR-RFLP. Animal Genetics 30, 79-80.
• TE PAS M.F.W., SOUMILLION A., HARDERS F.J., VERBURG F.L., VAN DEN BOSCH T.J.,GALESLOOT P., MEUWISSEN T.H.E., 1999 – Influences of MYOGenin genotypes on birth weight,growth rate, carcass weight, backfat thickness and lean weight of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2352-2356.
• TE PAS M.F.W., SOUMILLION A., VAN DEN BOSCH T.J., VENINGA G., MEUWISSEN T.H.E.,1966 – Association between polymorphism in the porcine MYOGenin gene locus and growth traits.Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of EAAP, Lillehammer, Norway.
• VAN RENS B.T., HAZELEGER W., VAN DER LENDE T., 2000 – Periovulatory hormone profiles and components of litter size in gilts with different estrogen receptor ESR1 genotypes.Theriogenology 53, 1375-1387.
• VYKOUKALOVÁ Z., KNOLL A., DVOŘÁK J., ROHRER G.A., ČEPICA S., 2003 – Linkage and radiation hybrid mapping of the porcine MYF6 gene to chromosome 5. Animal Genetics 34, 238-240.
• WANG H.N., GREENWALD G.S., 1993 – Hypophysectomy of the cycling mouse. I. Effects of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and leuteinizing hormone on folliculogenesis, FSH and human chorionic gonadotropin receptors and steroidogenesis. Biology of Reproduction 48, 595-605.
• WRIGHT W.E., SASSOON D. A., LIN V.K., 1989 – MYOG, a factor regulating MYOGenesis, has a domain homologous to MyoD. Cell 56, 607-617.