Impact of adjuvants on: phenmedipham, desmedipham and ethofumesate residues in soil and plant

• Autorzy: Kucharski M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of investigations was to evaluate the influence of herbicides and adjuvant application on residues in soil and plant material. Field experiments were carried out during 2003-2005 on arable field localized in South-West Poland. Herbicidal preparation to control weeds in sugar beet (containing phenmedipham, desmedipham and ethofumesate), was applied at recommended dose, reduced dose and at reduced dose in mixture with three different adjuvants (mineral oil, plant oil and surfactant). Samples of soil and roots of sugar beet were taken on the day at sugar beet lifting. Herbicide residues in all samples were determined using high performance liquid chromatography with UV-detection. The highest concentration of herbicide active substances were determined in samples from field plots, where herbicidal preparation was applied at full (recommended) dose. Reduction of herbicide dose caused a decrease of residues. The addition of adjuvants caused an increase of the herbicide active substance residue in the soil and roots of sugar beet comparing plots with a reduced dose of preparation without adjuvants added. Residues of active substances determined in roots of sugar beet did not exceed EU acceptable limits.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

herbicide residue; desmedipham; sugar-beet root; plant material; phenmedipham; soil sample; herbicide concentration; ethofumesate; herbicide; sugar-beet; soil; weed control; adjuvant

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Pestycydy
• Rocznik: 2007
• Numer: 3-4
• Opis fizyczny: p.53-59,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kucharski M.

• Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, National Research Institute, St.Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Van Der Werf H.M.G., Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 1996, 60, 81-92.
• [2] Menne H.J., Berger B.M., Weed Res., 2001, 41(3), 229-244.
• [3] McMullan P.M., Thomas J.M., Volgas G., Proc. 5th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals, Memphis, 17-21 August 1998, USA 1998, 285-290.
• [4] Harris C.I., J. Agric. Food Chem., 1969, 17, 80-93.
• [5] Nalewaja J.D., Praczyk T., Matysiak R., Weed Technol., 1995, 9, 689-695.
• [6] Knoche M., Weed Res., 1994, 34, 221-239.
• [7] Bruce J.A., Carey J.B., Weed Sci., 1996, 44, 447-454.
• [8] Sharma S.D., Kirkwood R.C., Whateley T.I., Weed Res., 1996, 36, 227-239.
• [9] Reddy K.N., Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxic., 1993, 50(3), 449-457.
• [10] Kucharski M., J. Plant Protection Res., 2003, 43(3), 225-232.
• [11] Swarcewicz M., Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin, Rolnictwo, 1996, 63, 211-217.
• [12] Swarcewicz M., Muliński Z., Zbieć I., Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxic., 1998, 60, 569-576.
• [13] Swarcewicz M., Muliński Z., Proc. 2nd International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, 25-28 June 1996, Denmark, 1996, 343-348.
• [14] Sumisławska J., Kostowska B., Prog. Plant Protection, 1991, 31(2), 152-156.
• [15] Kucharski M., Veg. Crops Res. Bull., 2004, 60, 63-70.