PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2006 | 56 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Cross-species amplification of microsatellite loci in European woodpeckers Picidae

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Microsatellites are currently a popular genetic marker in population and conservation genetics. Initial identification of the marker is expensive and labourconsuming, therefore cross-species microsatellite amplification is often use in species with a poorly recognized genome. The aim of our study was to assess the possibility of using microsatellite markers described for white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in genetic studies of other species of European Picidae. The set of six microsatellites was tested on nine woodpecker species. For each of them we describe number of loci successfully amplified and their level of polymorphism. We briefly discuss the possibility of utilizing tested markers in population and ecological studies of Picidae.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

56

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.819-826,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland
  • Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Abbott, C. L. and M. C. Double. 2003. Genetic structure, conservation genetics and evidence of speciation by range expansion in shy and white-capped albatrosses. Molecular Ecology, 12: 2953-2962.
  • Bouzat, J. L. and K. Johnson. 2004. Genetic structure among closely spaced leks in peripheral population of lesser prairie-chickens. Molecular Ecology, 13: 499-505.
  • Daniels, S. J. and J. R. Walters. 2000. Inbreeding depression and its effect on natal dispersal in red-cockaded woodpeckers. Condor, 102: 482-491. Davison, A., Birks, J. D. S., Brookes, R. C., Braithwait, T. C. and J. E. Messenger. 2002. On the origin of feaces: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats. Journal of Zoology (London), 257:141-143.
  • Domingo-Roura, X. 2002. Genetic distinction of marten species by fixation of microsatellite region. Journal of Mammalogy, 83: 907-912.
  • Ellegren, H., Carlson, A. and I. Stenberg. 1999. Genetic structure and variability of white-backed woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) populations in northern Europe. Hereditas, 130: 291-299.
  • Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. and D. A. Briscoe. 2003. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Galbusera, P., van Dongen, S. and E. Matthysen. 2000. Cross- species amplification of microsatellite primers in passerine birds. Conservation Genetics, 1: 163-168.
  • Gemmell, N. J., Allen, P. J., Goodman, S. J. and J. Z. Reed. 1997. Interspecific microsatellite markers for the study of pinniped populations. Molecular Ecology, 6: 661-666.
  • Gibbs, H. L., Dawson, R. G. and K. Hobson. 2000. Limited differentiation in microsatellite DNA variation among northern populations of the yellow warbler: evidence for malebiased gene flow? Molecular Ecology, 9: 2137-2147.
  • Girman, D. J., Vila, C., Geffen, E., Creel, S., Mills, M. G. L., McNutt, J. W., Ginsberg, J., Kat, P. W., Mamiya, K. H. and R. K. Wayne. 2001. Patterns of population subdivision, gene flow and genetic variability in the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Molecular Ecology, 10: 1703-1723.
  • Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT V2.9.3, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices, http://www.unil.ch/ izea/ softwares/f stat. htlm
  • Haig, S. M., Rhymer, J. M. and D. G. Heckel. 1994. Population differentiation in randomly amplified polymorphic DNA of red-cockaded woodpeckers Picoides borealis. Molecular Ecology, 3: 581-595.
  • Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Seminary, 41: 95-98.
  • Hartl, D. L. and A. G. Clark. 1997. Principles of Population Genetics. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
  • Höglung, J., Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A, Rintamaki, P. T. and J. Lindell. 1999. Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 266: 8134-816.
  • Hudson, Q. J., Wilkins, R. J., Waas, J. R. and I. D. Hogg. 2000. Low genetic variability in small populations of New Zealand kokako Callaeas wilsoni. Biological Conservation, 96:105-112.
  • Jones, C. J., Edwards, K. J., Castaglione, S., Winfield, M. O., Sala, F., van de Wiel, C., Bredemeijer, G., Vosman, B., Matthes, M., Daly, A., Brettschneider, R., Bettini, P., Buiatti M., Maestri, E., Malcevschi, A., Marmiroli, N., Aert, R., Volckaert, G., Rueda, J., Linacero, R., Vazquez, A. and A. Karp. 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Molecular Breeding, 3: 381-390.
  • Koskinen, M. T., Hirvonen, H., Landry, P-A. and C. R. Primmer. 2004. The benefits of increasing the number of microsatellites utilized in genetic population studies: an empirical perspective from analyses of grayling (Thymallus thymallus) evolutionary relationships. Hereditas, 141: 61-67.
  • Lee, P. L., M., Bradbury, R. B., Wilson, J. D., Flanagan, N. S., Richardson, L., Perkins, A. J. and J. R. Krebs. 2001. Microsatellite variation in the yellowhammer Embrezia citrinella: population structure of declining farmland bird. Molecular Ecology, 10: 1633-1644.
  • Lowe, A., Harris, S. and P. Ashton. 2004. Ecological genetics: design, analysis, and application. Blackwell Publishing, 326 pp.
  • Moore, S. S., Sargeant, L. L., King, T. J., Mattick, J. S., Georges, M. and D. J. Hetzel. 1991. The conservation of dinucleotide microsatellites among mammalian genomes allows the use of heterologous PCR primer pairs in closely related species. Genomics, 10: 654-660.
  • Morin, P. A., Mahboubi, P., Wedel, S. and J. Rogers. 1998. Rapid screening and comparison of human microsatellite markers in baboons: allele size is conserved, but allele number is not. Genomics, 53: 12-20.
  • Nei, M. and A. K. Roychoudhury. 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics, 76: 379-390.
  • Nichols, R. A., Bruford, M. W. and J. J. Groombridge. 2001. Sustaining genetic variation in a small population: evidence from the Mauritius kestrel. Molecular Ecology, 593-602.
  • Paekal, R. and P. E. Smouse. 2001. GenAlEx V5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. http://www.anu.ed.au/BoZo/GenAlEx/
  • Primmer, C. R., Moller, A. P. and H. Ellegren. 1996. A widerange survey of cross-species microsatellite amplification in birds. Molecular Ecology, 5: 365-378.
  • Primmer, C. R., Raudsepp, T., Chowdhary, B. P., Moller, A. P. and H. Ellegren. 1997. Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome. Genome Research, 7: 471-482.
  • Primmer, C. R., Painter, J. N., Koskinen, M. T., Palo, J. U. and J. Merilä. 2005. Factors affecting avian cross-microsatel- lite amplification. Journal of Avian Biology, 36: 348-360.
  • Richard M., and R. S. Thorpe. 2001. Can microsatellites be used to infer phylogenies? Evidence from population affinities of Western Canary Island Lizard (Gallotia galloti). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20: 351-360.
  • Roeder, A. D., Marshall, R. K., Mitchelson, A. J., Visagathilagar, T., Ritchie, P. A., Love, D. R., Pakai, T. J., McPartlan, H. C., Murray, N. D., Robinson, N. A., Kerry, K. R. and D. M. Lambert. 2001. Gene flow on the ice: genetic differentiation among Adèlie penguin colonies around Antarctica. Molecular Ecology, 10: 1645-1656.
  • Rubinsztein, D. C., Amos, W., Leggo, J., Goodburn, S., Jain, S., Li, S. H., Margolis, R. L., Ross, C. A. and M. A. Ferguson-Smith. 1995. Microsatellite evolution - evidence for directionality and variation in rate between species. Nature Genetics, 10: 337-343.
  • Rutkowski R., Niewęgłowski H., Dziedzic R., Kmieć M. and J. Goździewski J. 2005. Genetic variability of the Polish population of the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus. Acta Ornithologica, 40: 27-34.
  • Scribner, K. T. and J. M. Pearce. 2000. Microsatellites: evolutionary and methodological background and empirical applications at individual, population and phylogenetic level. In: Molecular Methods in Ecology (Baker A., ed), pp. 235-271. Blackwell Science Limited, London.
  • Sefc, K. M., Payne, R. B. and M. D. Sorenson. 2003. Microsatellite amplification from museum feather samples: effects of fragments size and template concentration on genotyping errors. Auk, 120: 982-989.
  • Sloane, M. A, Sunnucks, P., Alpers, D., Beheregaray, L. B. and A. C. Taylor. 2000. Highly reliable genetic identification of individual northern hairy-nosed wombats from single remotely collected hairs: a feasible censusing method. Molecular Ecology, 9: 1233-1240.
  • Stangel, P. W., Lennartz, M. R. and M. H. Smith. 1992. Genetic variation and population structure of red-cockaded woodpeckers. Conservation Biology, 6: 283-292.
  • Tallmon, D. A., Draheim, H. M., Scott Mills, L., and F. W. Alendorf. 2002. Insight into recently fragmented vole populations from combined genetic and demographic data. Molecular Ecology, 11: 699-709.
  • Weibel, A. C. and W. S. A. Moore. 2002. Test of a mitochondrial gene-based phytogeny of woodpeckers (Genus Picoides) using an independent nuclear gene, ß-fibrinogen intron 7. Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution, 22: 247-257.
  • Winkler, H., Kotaka, N., Gamauf, A., Nittinger, F. and Haring, E. 2005. On the phylogenetic position of the Okinawa woodpecker (Sapheopipo noguchii). Journal of Ornithology, 146: 103-110.
  • Zink, R. M., Drovetski, S. and S. Rohwer. 2002a: Phylogeographic patterns in the great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major across Eurasia. Journal of Avian Biology, 33: 175-178.
  • Zink, R. M., Rohwer, S., Drovetski, S., Blackwell-Rago, R. C. and S. L. Farrell. 2002b. Holarctic phylogeography and species limits of Three-toed Woodpecker. Condor, 104: 167-170.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-af25bb7a-b9c9-4005-89a1-b586240370b3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.