End- of- life scenarios for municipal solid waste of defence housing authority Lahore, Pakistan

• Autorzy: Ali A. , Azam S. , Khalid A. , Norman D.-S. , Jamil N. , Samina F. , Skaikh I.A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper evaluates the environmental impacts of various municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment options produced on-site simultaneously with energy and material recovery. The results present a comparison of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in five different waste scenarios along with baseline scenario of the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) in Lahore. All scenarios were modeled using EaseTech software. Nine impact categories were assessed and results were presented based on the ASTM D5231-92(2003) characterization method. Results revealed that a material recovery facility (MRF) had low global warming potential (GWP), but lower avoided burdens in other impact categories. The incineration process indicated fewer burdens on the environment such as GWP (-2.086×10⁷ kg CO₂ eq) as compared to landfills (2.461×10⁷ kg CO₂ eq). This was due to lower avoided emissions in the landfill process compared to incineration. The negative values in results represented higher avoided emissions in treatment processes. Bio-gasification avoided CO₂ emissions (-8.053×10⁵ kg CO₂ eq), but showed negative impacts in other categories. Almost all impact categories were high in composting except for freshwater eutrophication. LCA results provided good knowledge for decision makers as a tool to decide what alternative is a better change for sustainable waste management.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 26
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.961-968,fig.,ef.

Twórcy

autor

Ali A.

• College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

autor

Azam S.

• College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

autor

Khalid A.

• College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

autor

Norman D.-S.

• School of Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia

autor

Jamil N.

• College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

autor

Samina F.

• Department of Botany, University of the Punjab

autor

Skaikh I.A.

• College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

Bibliografia

• 1. CHERUBINI F., BARGIGLI S., ULGIATI S. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy 34 (12), 2116, 2009.
• 2. BATOOL S.A., CHAUDHRY M.N. Municipal solid waste management in Lahore city district, Pakistan. Waste Manage. 29 (6), 1971, 2009.
• 3. OTHMAN S.N., NOOR Z.Z., ABBA A.H., YUSUF R.O., HASSAN M.A.A. Review on life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management in some Asian countries. J. of Clean Prod. 41, 251, 2013.
• 4. GIUSTI L. A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Manage. 29 (8), 2227, 2009.
• 5. BATOOL S.A., CHAUDHRY M.N., MAJEED K. Economic potential of recycling business in Lahore, Pakistan. Waste Manage. 28 (2), 294, 2008.
• 6. SEADON J.K. Sustainable waste management systems. J. of Clean Prod. 18 (16), 1639, 2010.
• 7. YAY A.S.E. Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. J. of Clean Prod. 94, 284, 2015.
• 8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives Off. J. EU L, 312:3–30, 2008.
• 9. EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 1999/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council retrieved 20 November 2005 on Landfill Directives Off. J. EU L, 182:0001–0019, 1999.
• 10. CLEARY J. Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. Environ. Int. 35 (8), 1256, 2009.
• 11. RIGAMONTI L., GROSSO M., SUNSERI M.C. Influence of assumptions about selection and efficiencies on the LCA of integrated waste management systems. The Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 14, 411, 2009.
• 12. BUTTOL P., MASONI P., BONOLI A., GOLDONI S., BELLADONNA V., CAVAZZUTI C. LCA of integrated MSW management systems: case study of the Bologna District. Waste Manage. 27 (8), 1059, 2007.
• 13. HONG R.J., WANG G.F., GUO R.Z., CHENG X., LIU Q., ZHANG P.J., QIAN G.R. Life cycle assessment of BMT-based integrated municipal solid waste management: Case study in Pudong, China. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 49 (2), 129, 2006.
• 14. ZAMAN A.U. Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycle assessment method. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 7 (2), 225, 2010.
• 15. RYU C. Potential of municipal solid waste for renewable energy production and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in South Korea. J. Air Waste Manage. 60 (2), 176, 2010.
• 16. MORF L.S., GLOOR R., HAAG O., HAUPT M., SKUTAN S., DI LORENZO F., BONI D. Precious metals and rare earth elements in municipal solid waste-Sources and fate in a Swiss incineration plant. Waste Manage. 33 (3), 634, 2013.
• 17. BOESCH M.E., VADENBO C., SANER D., HUTER C., HELLWEG S. An LCA model for waste incineration enhanced with new technologies for metal recovery and application to the case of Switzerland. Waste Manage. 34 (2), 378, 2014.
• 18. STANDARD ASTM (2003) Standard Test Methods for Determination of the Composition of Unprocessed Municipal Solid Waste. ASTM D 5231-92, 2003.
• 19. STANDARD ASTM (2007) A standard test method for gross calorific value of coal and coke. ASTM D 5865-02, 2007.
• 20. GEODKOOP M., OELE M., EFFTING S. Sima pro 6.0: database manual, methods library. Pre consultants, Pays Bas, 2004.
• 21. BAUMAN H., TILLMAN A.M. The Hitch Hiker\’s Guide to LCA. 2004.
• 22. PARKES O., LETTIERI P., BOGLE I.D.L. Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems for alternative legacy scenarios of the London Olympic Park. Waste Manage. 40, 157, 2015.
• 23. TIAN W.D., WEI X.L., WU D.Y., LI J., SHENG H.Z. Analysis of ingredient and heating value of municipal solid waste. J. Environ. Sci. 13 (1), 87, 2001.
• 24. HETTIARATCHI J.P.A., PRADO B., RUWANPURA J., RAJBHANDHARI B. Development of a construction waste recycling program: a statistical approach. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2006.
• 25. BOVEA M.D., IBANEZ-FORES V., GALLARDO A., COLOMER-MENDOZA F.J. Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies, A Spanish case study. Waste Manage. 30 (11), 2383, 2010.
• 26. KALANATARIFARD A., YANG G.S. Identification of the municipal solid waste characteristics and potential of plastic recovery at Bakri Landfill, Muar, Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development 5 (7), 11, 2012.
• 27. BORGLIN S.E., HAZEN T.C., OLDENBURG C.M., ZAWISLANSKI P.T. Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic biotreatment of municipal solid waste. J. Air Waste Manage. 54 (7), 815, 2004.
• 28. ANDERSEN J.K., BOLDRIN A., CHRISTENSEN T.H., SCHEUTZ C. Home composting as an alternative treatment option for organic household waste in Denmark: an environmental assessment using life cycle assessment-modelling. Waste Manage. 32 (1), 31, 2012.
• 29. WILSHUSEN J.H., HETTIARATCHI J.P.A., DE VISSCHER A., SAINT-FORT R. Methane oxidation and formation of EPS in compost: effect of oxygen concentration. Environ. Pollut. 129 (2), 305-314, 2004.
• 30. KOMILIS D.P., HAM R.K. Life-cycle inventory of municipal solid waste and yard waste windrow composting in the United States. J. Environ. Eng-ASCE 130 (11), 1390, 2004.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/67657