Assessment of cross compatibility of pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars on the basis of pollen tube observations and analysis of the S-RNase gene

• Autorzy: Antkowiak W. , Wojciechowski A. , Wolko L. , Lysiak G.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ocena zgodności krzyżowej odmian Pyrus communis L. na podstawie obserwacji łagiewek pyłkowych i analizy genu S-Rnase

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Diallel crosses of P. communis cultivars: ‘Amfora’, ‘Radana’, ‘Red Williams’, ‘Carola’, ‘Conference’, and ‘Dicolor’, were conducted under orchard and laboratory conditions at temperatures of 20oC and 28oC . Based on pollen tube observations and after the determination of the S genotypes, the usefulness of these pear cultivars as cross pollinators was evaluated as good and very good.

PL

Krzyżowe zapylenia w układzie diallelicznym pomiędzy odmianami P. communis ‘Amfora’, ‘Radana’, ‘Red Bonkreta Williamsa’, ‘Carola’, ‘Konferencja’ i ‘Dicolor’ przeprowadzono w sadzie, a także w warunkach laboratoryjnych w temperaturach 20oC i 28oC. Na podstawie obserwacji łagiewek pyłkowych oraz po określeniu genotypów S odmian gruszy uprawnej oceniono ich przydatność w charakterze wzajemnych zapylaczy. Otrzymane wyniki wskazują, iż bardzo dobrymi i dobrymi zapylaczami dla badanych odmian P. communis są: Odmiana Zapylacze ‘Amfora’ ‘Red Bonkreta Williamsa’, ‘Radana’, ‘Konferencja’, ‘Dicolor’ ‘Radana’ ‘Red Bonkreta Williamsa’, ‘Carola’, ‘Dicolor’ ‘Red Bonkreta Williamsa’ ‘Amfora’, ‘Radana’, ‘Carola’, ‘Konferencja’, ‘Dicolor’ ‘Carola’ ‘Radana’, ‘Red Bonkreta Williamsa’, ‘Konferencja’, ‘Dicolor’ ‘Konferencja’ ‘Carola’, ‘Radana’ ‘Dicolor’ ‘Amfora’, ‘Radana’, ‘Carola’, ‘Konferencja’, ‘Dicolor’, ‘Red Bonkreta Williamsa’

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Agrobotanica
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 66
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.29-34,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Antkowiak W.

• Department of Botany, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland

autor

Wojciechowski A.

• Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland

autor

Wolko L.

• Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland

autor

Lysiak G.

• Department of Pomology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• Bellini E., Sansavini S., Lugli S., Nini S., Rivalta L. 2000. Obiettivi innovatori del miglioramento genetico del pero nel mondo. Riv. Frutt. Ortofloro It. 9: 56–69.
• Botta R., Akkak A., Me G., Radicati L., Casavecchia V. 1998. Identification of pear cultivars by molecular markers. Acta Hort. 457: 63–70.
• De Nettanncourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag (Ed.) Berlin, Germany.
• Egea J., Burgos L. 1996. Detecting cross-incompatibility of three North American apricot cultivars and establishing the first incompatibility group in apricot. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121: 1002–1005.
• Halász J., Hegedűs A. 2006. Self-incompatibility in pears (Pyrus communis L., Pyrus serotina Rehd. and Pyrus ussuriensis). Review. Int. J. Hort. Sci. 12 (2): 87–91.
• Hiratsuka S., Hirano A., Kawai Y., Zhang S.L. 2004. Self-incompatibility in Japanese pears: peculiar inhibitory action of S-RNase on self-pollen tube growth in vitro. Acta Hort. 636: 347–356.
• Ishimizu T., Inoue K., Shimonaka M., Saito T., Terai O., Norioka S. 1999. PCR-based method for identifying the S-genotypesof Japanese pear cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 691–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001220051156
• Kester D.E., Gradziel T.M., Micke W.C. 1994. Identifying pollen incompatibility groups in California almond cultivar. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119: 106–109.
• Le Lezec M. 1998. Pollinisation du poirer. L’arboriculture Fruitiere, 520: 37–40.
• Martin F. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology, 34: 125–128.
• Matsuzawa Y. 1983. Studies of the interspecific hybridisation in genus Brasssica. II. Crossability in interspecific crosses, B. oleracea × B. campestris. Japan J. Breed. 33: 321–330.
• McClure B.A., Haring V., Ebert P.R., Anderson M.A., Simpson R.J., Sakiyama F., Clarke A.E. 1989. Style self-incompatibility gene products of Nicotiana alata are ribonucleases. Nature, 342: 955–957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/342955a0
• Nyéki J., Soltész M., Ivancsics J. 2000. Self-fertility of pear varieties conditioned by natural self-pollination (autogamy). Int. J. Hort. Sci. 6: 110–113.
• Sanzol J., Herrero M. 2002. Identification of self-incompatibility in pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.). Euphytica, 128: 325–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021213905461
• Takasaki T., Moriya Y., Okada K., Yamamoto K., Iwanami H., Bessho H., Nakanishi T. 2006. cDNA cloning of nine S alleles and establishment of a PCR-RFLP system for genotyping European pear cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 1543–1552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0257-7
• Tehrani G., Lay J.W. 1988. Verification of pedigrees of different sweet cherry cultivars introduced from Vineland through pollen compatibility studies. HortScience, 23: 783–788.
• Williams J.G., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., Rafalski J.A., Tingey S.V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531–6535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.22.6531
• Wojciechowski A., Antkowiak W. 2009. Selection of pollinators for particular pear cultivars (Pyrus comminis L.) based on the observation of the pollen tubes. Herba Pol. 55 (3): 257–265.
• Wojciechowski A. 1985. Interspecific hybrids between Brassica campestris and B. oleracea. I. Effectiveness of crossing. Observations of pollen tube growth. The course of embriogenesis. Genet. Pol. 26 (4): 423–436.
• Wolko Ł., Antkowiak W., Sips M., Słomski R. 2010. Self-incompatibility allele in Polish wild pear (Pyrus pyrastr (L.) Burgsd.): a preliminary analysis. J. Appl. Genet 51 (1): 33–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03195708
• Zhang S., Hiratsuka S. 2000. Cultivar and developmental differences in S-protein concentration and self-incompatibility in the Japanese pear. HortScience,35 (5): 917–920.
• Zisovich A.H., Stern R.A., Shafar S., Goldway M. 2004. Identification of seven S-alleles from the European pear (Pyrus communis L.) and the determination of compatibility among cultivars. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 79: 101–106.
• Zuccherelli S., Tassinari P., Broothaerts W., Tartarini S., Dondini L., Sansavini S. 2002. S-allele characterization in self-incompatible pear (Pyrus communis L.). Sex. Plant Reprod. 15: 153–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00497-002-0145-5

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu