Power performance of the combined monopile wind turbine and floating buoy with heave-type wave energy converter

• Autorzy: Homayoun E. , Ghassemi H. , Ghafari H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study deals with a new concept of near-shore combined renewable energy system which integrates a monopile wind turbine and a floating buoy with heave-type wave energy converter( WEC). Wave energy is absorbed by power-take-off (PTO) systems. Four different shapes of buoy model are selected for this study. Power performance in regular waves is calculated by using boundary element method in ANSYS-AQWA software in both time and frequency domains. This software is based on three-dimensional radiation/diffraction theory and Morison’s equation using mixture of panels and Morison elements for determining hydrodynamic loads. For validation of the approach the numerical results of the main dynamic responses of WEC in regular wave are compared with the available experimental data. The effects of the heaving buoy geometry on the main dynamic responses such as added mass, damping coefficient, heave motion, PTO damping force and mean power of various model shapes of WEC in regular waves with different periods, are compared and discussed. Comparison of the results showed that using WECs with a curvature inward in the bottom would absorb more energy from sea waves

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Maritime Research
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 26
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.107-114,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Homayoun E.

• Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Hafez Ave., Teheran, Iran

autor

Ghassemi H.

• Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Hafez Ave., Teheran, Iran

autor

Ghafari H.

• Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Hafez Ave., Teheran, Iran

Bibliografia

• 1. Pérez-Collazo, C., D. Greaves, and G. Iglesias, A review of combined wave and offshore wind energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 42: pp. 141-153.
• 2. Antonio, F.d.O., Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2010. 14(3): pp. 899-918.
• 3. Aubault, A., et al. Modeling of an oscillating water column on the floating foundation WindFloat. in : ASME 2011 30thInternational Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2011. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 4. Luan, C., et al. Modeling and analysis of a 5 MW semi-submersible wind turbine combined with three flap-type Wave Energy Converters. in : ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 5. Michailides, C., et al. Effect of flap type wave energy converters on the response of a semi-submersible wind turbine in operational conditions. in : ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 6. Peiffer, A., D. Roddier, and A. Aubault. Design of a point absorber inside the WindFloat structure. in : ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2011. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 7. Bachynski, E.E. and T. Moan. Point absorber design for a combined wind and wave energy converter on a tension-leg support structure. in : ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2013. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 8. Muliawan, M.J., et al., Extreme responses of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and floating wave energy converter (STC) system with survival modes. Ocean Engineering, 2013. 65: pp. 71-82.
• 9. Muliawan, M.J., M. Karimirad, and T. Moan, Dynamic response and power performance of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and coaxial floating wave energy converter. Renewable Energy, 2013. 50: pp. 47-57.
• 10. Muliawan, M.J., et al. STC (Spar-Torus Combination): a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and large point absorber floating wave energy converter—promising and challenging. in : ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2012. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 11. Wan, L., Z. Gao, and T. Moan, Experimental and numerical study of hydrodynamic responses of a combined wind and wave energy converter concept in survival modes. Coastal Engineering, 2015. 104: pp. 151-169.
• 12. Wan, L., Z. Gao, and T. Moan. Model test of the STC concept in survival modes. in : ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 13. Wan, L., et al., Experimental and numerical comparisons of hydrodynamic responses for a combined wind and wave energy converter concept under operational conditions.Renewable Energy, 2016. 93: pp. 87-100.
• 14 . Wa n, L ., et a l ., Comparative experimental study of the survivability of a combined wind and wave energy converter in two testing facilities. Ocean Engineering, 2016. 111: pp. 82-94.
• 15. Ren, N., et al. Dynamic Response of a Combined Mono-Pile Wind Turbine and Heave-Type Wave Energy Converter System. In : ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 16. Ren, N., et al., Experimental and numerical study of hydrodynamic responses of a new combined monopile wind turbine and a heave-type wave energy converter under typical operational conditions. Ocean Engineering, 2018. 159: pp. 1-8.
• 17. Jonk man, J.M., Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3. 2010: Citeseer.
• 18. Rourke, F.O., F. Boyle, and A. Reynolds, Renewable energy resources and technologies applicable to Ireland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009. 13(8): pp. 1975-1984.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pomr-2019-0051