PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 34 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Response of some physiological parameters of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to variation in the light environment

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Light is considered as an important source of energy for all types of plants, and any change in its quality or quantity such as R:FR ratio affects plant growth through physiological, morphological, and biochemical processes. To examine the impact of changes in light quality on sunflower canopy, a factorial experiment with three replications was conducted at the Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, in spring and summer 2014. The treatments included planting density (5 and 10 plants per square meter), leaf arrangement (no defoliation, and defoliating 50% of leaves of each plant when heads became visible), and the colors of optical filters wrapped around the shoot (blue cellophane with R:FR = 1.84 passing blue spectrum with the wavelength 480.62 nm, white cellophane as a control treatment for the blue one with R:FR = 2.40 which transmit the whole spectrum contained in the sunlight, and a control where no filter was used). The use of blue filters resulted in greater stem elongation, reduced stem diameter, and reduced amounts of plant dry matter allocated to each sunflower head as well as the achene number per capitulum. Blue filters had no significant impact on 100-grain weight. During the growing period, reduction in the dry matter allocated to stem was smaller when blue filters were used, especially for the defoliation treatments, compared to where no filter or white filters were used. Defoliation in combination with using blue filters at a density of 5 plants m-2 increased specific leaf area (SLA) due to larger leaf areas. It seems any variation in R:FR, plant density, and/or leaf density can influence sunflower yield through affecting photo-morphological processes
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
34
Numer
1
Opis fizyczny
p.63-85,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
  • Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
autor
  • Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
autor
  • Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
autor
  • Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
Bibliografia
  • ALIMOHAMMADI R., AZIZOV I. 2011. Defoliation effects on yield and yield components of sunflower cultivars (Helianthus annuus L.). Int. J. AgriScience., 1(7): 361–365.
  • ALKIO M., SCHUBERT A., DIEPENBROCK W., GRIMM E. 2003. Effect of source-sink ratio on seed set and filling in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Environ., 26: 1609–1619. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01077.x.
  • ALYABYEV A.JU., LOSEVA N.L., JAKUSHENKOVA T.P., RACHIMOVA G.G. 2002. Comparative effects of blue light and red light on the rates of oxygen metabolism and heat production in wheat seedlings stressed by heat shock. Thermochimica Acta, 394: 227–231.
  • BABAEI AGHDAM J., ABDI M., SEIFZADEH S., KHIAVI, M. 2009.Effects of different levels of nitrogen and plant density on yield and yield components of sunflower, Azargol cultivar in Takestan region. Iranian. J. New Agric. Sci., 14: 1–12.
  • BALDISSERA T.C., FRAK E., CARVALHO P.C.D.F., LOUARN G. 2014. Plant development controls leaf area expansion in alfalfa plants competing for light. Ann. Bot., 113: 145–157.
  • BALLARE, C.L., CASAL J.J. 2000. Light signals perceived by crop and weed plants. Field Crop Res., 67: 149–160.
  • BALLARE C.L., SCOPEL A.L., JORDAN E.T., VIESTRA R.D. 1994. Signaling among neighboring plants and development of size inequalities in plant population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 10 094–10 098.
  • BALOCH J., QASIM KHAN M., ZUBAIR M., MUNIR M. 2009. Effects of different shade levels (light integrals) on time to flowering of important ornamental annuals. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11(2): 138–144.
  • BANGE M., HAMMER P.G.L., RICKERT K.G. 1997. Effect of radiation environment on radiation use efficiency and growth of sunflower. Crop Sci., 37: 1208–1214.
  • BARROS J.F.C. CARVALHO M., BASCH G. 2004. Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to sowing date and plant density under Mediterranean conditions. Europ. J. Agron., 21: 347–356.
  • BOOTH B.D., MURPHY S.D., SWANTON C.J. 2003. Weed ecology in natural and agricultural sys-tems. Bristol: CAB International, Wyvern 21 Ltd.
  • BRITZ S.J., SAGER J.C. 1990. Photomorphogenesis and photoassimilation in soybean and sorghum grown under broad spectrum or blue-deficient light sources. Plant Physiol., 94: 448–454.
  • CRUZ-CASTILLO J.G., WOOLLEY D.J., FAMIANI F. 2010. Effects of defoliation on fruit growth, car-bohydrate reserves and subsequent flowering of ‘hayward’ kiwifruit vines. Sci. Hort., 125: 579–583.
  • FRANKLIN K.A., WHITELAM G.C. 2004. Light signals, phytochromes and cross-talk with other envi-ronmental cues. J. Exp. Bot., 55: 271–276.
  • FUKUDA N., FUJITA M., OHTA Y. 2008. Directional blue light irradiation triggers epidermal cell elongation of abaxial side resulting in inhibition of leaf epinasty in geranium under red light condition. Sci. Hort., 115: 176–182.
  • GARDNER F.P., PEARCE R.B., MITCHELL R.L. 1985. Physiology of crop plant. Ames. USA, Iowa State University Press.
  • GHOLINEZHAD E., AYNABAND A., HASSANZADE GHORTAPEH A., NOORMOHAMAD, G., BERNOUSII. 2009. Study of the effect of drought stress on yield, yield components and harvest index of sunflower hybrid Euroflor at different levels of nitrogen and plant population. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj. Napoca., 37(2): 85–94.
  • HEATHER A., GRAHAM H., DECOTEAU D.R. 1997. Young watermelon plant growth responses to end-of-day red and far-red light are affected by direction of exposure and plant part exposed.Sci. Hort., 69: 41–49.
  • HEUVELINK E. 1999. Evaluation of a dynamic simulation model for tomato crop growth and devel-opment. Ann. Bot., 83: 413–422.
  • HOLT N.M., ZENTNER R.P. 1985. Effect of plant density and row spacing on agronomic perfor-mance and economic returns of non-oil seed sunflower in southeastern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci., 65: 501–509.
  • HURD R.G. 1974. The effect of an incandescent supplement on the growth of tomato plants in low light. Ann. Bot., 38: 613–623.
  • IBRAHIM H.M. 2012. Response of some sunflower hybrids to different levels of plant density. APC-BEE Procedia., 4: 175–182.
  • KASPERBAUER M.J. 1987. Far-red light reflection from green leaves and effects on phytochrome mediated assimilate partitioning under field conditions. Plant Physiol., 85: 350–354.
  • KASPERBAUER M.J., KARLEN D.L. 1994. Plant spacing and reflected far-red light effects on phyto-chrome-regulated photosynthate allocation in corn seedlings. Crop Sci., 34: 1564–1569.
  • KRIZEK D.T., ORMROD D.P. 1980. Growth response of grand rapids lettuce and first lady marigold to increased far-red and infrared radiation under controlled environments. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 105: 936–939.
  • KUBOTA S., YAMATO T., HISAMATSU T., ESAK S., OI R., ROH M.S., KOSHIOKA M. 2000. Effect of red-and far-red-rich spectral treatment and diurnal temperature alternation on the growth and development of petunia. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci., 69(4): 403–409.
  • KUREPIN L.V., WALTON L.J. 2007. Interaction of red to far red light ratio and ethylene in regulat-ing stem elongation of Helianthus annuus. Plant Growth Regul., 51: 53–61.
  • KUREPIN L.V., NEIL EMERY R.J., PHARIS R.P., REID D.V. 2007. Uncoupling light quality from light irradiance effects in Helianthus annuus shoots: putative roles for plant hormones in leaf and internode growth. J. Exp. Bot., 58(8): 2145–2157
  • LAMBERS H., CHAPIN F.S., PONS T.L. 2008. Plant physiological ecology (2nd ed). New York, USA, Springer-Verlag.lee j.h., heuvelinK e. 2003. Simulation of leaf area development based on dry matter partitioning and specific leaf area for cut Chrysanthemum. Ann. Bot., 91: 319–327.
  • LI S., RAJAPAKSE N.C., YOUNG R.E., OI, R. 2000. Growth responses of chrysanthemum and bell pepper transplants to photoselective plastic films. Sci. Hort., 84: 215–225.
  • LIBENSON S., RODRIGUEZ V., LÓPEZ PEREIRA M., SÁNCHEZ R.A., CASAL J.J. 2002. Low red to far-red ratios reaching the stem reduce grain yield in sunflower. Crop Sci., 42: 1180–1185.
  • lINDSTRÖM L.I., PELLEGRINI C.N., AGUIRREZÁBAL L.A.N., HERNÁNDEZ L.F. 2006. Growth and development of sunflower fruits under shade during pre and early post-anthesis period. Field Crops Res., 96: 151–159.
  • LÜTTGE U. 2007. Carbon dioxide signaling in plant leaves. C. R. Biologies, 330: 375–381.
  • MALIAKAL S.K., MCDONNELL K., DUDLEY S.A., SCHMITT J. 1999. Effect of red to far-red ratio and plant density on biomass allocation and gas exchange in Impatiens capensis. Int. J. Plant Sci., 160(4): 723–733.
  • MAZZELLA M.A., ZANOR M.I., FERNIE A.R., CASAL J.J. 2008. Metabolic responses to red/far-red ratio and ontogeny show poor correlation with the growth rate of sunflower stems. J. Exp. Bot., 59(9): 2469–2477.
  • MILLER J.F., FICK G.N. 1978. Influence of plant population on performance of sunflower hybrids.Can. J. Plant Sci., 58: 597–600.
  • MORIONDO M., ORLANDINI S., VILLALOBOS F.J. 2003. Modelling compensatory effects of defolia-tion on leaf area growth and biomass of sunflower (Helianthus annuus l.). Europ. J. Agron., 19: 161–171.
  • MORRISON M.J., STEWART D.W. 1995. Radiation-use efficiency in summer grape. Agron. J., 87: 1139–1142.
  • NEZAMI A., KHAZAEI H.R., BOROUMAND REZAZADEH Z., HOSSEINI A. 2008. Effects of drought stress and defoliation on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in controlled conditions. Desert., 12: 99–104.
  • OLSZEWSKI N., SUN T., GUBLER, F. 2002. Gibberellin signaling: biosynthesis, catabolism, and re-sponse pathways. Plant Cell. Suppl.: S61–S80.
  • OYAERT E., VOLCHAERT E., DEBERGH, P.C. 1999. Growth of chrysanthemum under coloured plas-tic films with different light qualities and quantities. Sci. Hort., 79: 195–205.
  • POLAT T., OZER H., OZTURK E. 2011. Responses of hybrid and open pollination sunflowers (Helian-thus annus l.) to defoliation. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 5(2): 132–137.
  • POURSAKHY N., KHAJEPOUR M. 2014. Effect of planting pattern and plant density on growth and yield of sunflower (hisun-36) hybrid. Agron. J., 104: 54–61.
  • PRICE H.J., JOHNSTON J.S. 1996. Influence of light on dna content of Helianthus annuus linnaeus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 93: 11264–11267
  • ROSHDI M., REZADOOST S., KHALILI MAHALLEH J., HAJI HASANI ASL N. 2009. Effects of plant density and defoliation at different developmental stages on yield and yield components of nuts sunflower. Iranian J. New Agric. Sci., 15: 41–54.
  • SANGOI L., GRACIETTI M.A., RAMPAZZO C., BIANCHETTI P. 2002. Response of Brazilian maize hy-brids from different areas to changes in plant density. Field Crop Res., 79: 39–51.
  • SARALA M., TAULAVUORI K., TAULAVUORI E., KARHU J., LAINE K. 2007. Elongation of scots pine seedlings under blue light depletion is independent of etiolation. Environ. Exp. Bot., 60: 340–343.
  • SCHNEITER A.A., JOHNSON B.L. 1994. Response of sunflower plants to physical injury. Can. J. Plant Sci., 74(4): 763–766.
  • SCHNEITER A.A., JONES J.M., HAMMOND J.J. 1987. Simulated hail research in sunflower defoliation. Agron. J., 79: 431–434.
  • SEVERINO L.S., FREIRE M.A.O., LUCENA A.M.A., VALE L.S. 2010. Sequential defoliations influenc-ing the development and yield components of castor plants (Ricinus communis l.). Ind. Crops Prod., 32: 400–404. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.06.007.
  • SMITH H. 1982. Light quality, photoperception, and plant strategy. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.,33: 481–518.
  • TAIZ L., ZEIGER E. 2006. Plant Physiology. 4th Ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, Sinauer Assoiciates Inc.
  • TERASHIMA I., HANBA Y.T., TAZOE Y., VYAS P., YANO S. 2006. Irradiance and phenotype: compara-tive ecodevelopment of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic co2 diffusion. J. Exp. Bot., 57: 343–354.
  • VAN HINSBERG A.A., VAN TIELDEREN P. 1997. Variation in growth from in relation to spectral light quality (red/far red ratio) in Plantago lanceolata l. In sun and shade population. Oecologia, 111: 452–459.
  • VANDENBUSSCHE F., VAN DER STRAETEN D. 2004. Shaping the shoot: a circuitry that integrates multiple signals. Trends Plant Sci., 9: 499–506.
  • VOLKOV A.G., DUNKLEY T.C., LABADY A.J., BROWN C.L. 2005. Phototropism and electrified inter-faces in green plants. Electrochim. Acta., 50: 4241–4247.
  • VOLKOV A.G., DUNKLEY T.C., MORGAN S.A., RUFF II D., BOYCE Y.L., LABADY A.J. 2004. Bioelec-trochemical signaling in green plants induced by photosensory systems. Bioelectrochemistry, 63: 91– 94.
  • VOS J. 1995. The effects of nitrogen supply and stem density on leaf attributes and stem branching in potato (Solanum tuberosum l.). Potato Res., 38(3): 271–279.
  • WILSON S.B., RAJAPAKSE N.C. 2001. Growth regulation of sub-tropical perennials by photoselec-tive plastic films. J. Environ. Hort., 19(2): 65–68.
  • XIA S., CHEN S., ZHAO L., WANG, G. 2006. Density effects on plant height growth and inequality in sunflower population. Agron. J., 48: 513–519.
  • XIONG, J. PATIL G.G., MOE R. 2002. Effect of dif and end- of- day light quality on stem elongation in Cucumis sativus. Sci. Hort., 94: 219–229.
  • YAMADA A., TANIGAWA T., SUYAMA T., MATSUNO T., KUNITAKE T. 2008. Improvement of Eustoma grandiflorum (raf.) Shinn. Cut flower quality for early-autumn shipping with long-day treat-ment using light sources that delay flower bud formation. J. Jpn. Soc., 77: 296–303.
  • YAMAZAKI H., OI R., HAMANO M., YAMATO Y., MIURA H. 2000. Inhibition of bulb development of Allium wakegi araki by covering with far- red- intercepting film in summer. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci., 69(3): 250–254.
  • YANG F., HUANG S., GAO R., LIU W., YONG T., WANG X., WUA X., YANG W. 2014. Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red:far-red ratio. Field Crop Res., 155: 245–253.
  • YANO S., TERASHIMA I. 2001. Separate localization of light signal perception for sun or shade type chloroplast and palisade tissue differentiation in Chenopodium album. Plant Cell Physiol., 42: 1303–1310.
  • YOUSEFPOOR Z., YADAVI A. 2014. Effect of biological and chemical fertilizers of nitrogen and phos-phorus on quantitative and qualitative yield of sunflower. Iranian J.Agric. Sci. Sustain. Prod., 24(1): 95–112.
  • ZHOU Y., SINGH B.R. 2002. Red light stimulates flowering and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Ame-rican cranberry. Plant Growth Reg., 38: 161–171.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-ab6c29e1-f08d-4670-b948-f7e47806dde8
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.