Multi-criteria analysis of waste management in Szczecin

• Autorzy: Generowicz A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article tries to find the best solution of the system, which aims to dispose of the waste stream, being at the same time an economically justified and socially acceptable system. In order to find the best possible system three strategies for dealing with waste were considered, evaluated by 11 criteria in line with sustainable development, included in the following groups: environmental, social, and economic. The evaluation criteria are used in the multi-criteria analysis, which is the final step in the decision-making analysis. The most effective solution selected is additionally dependent on the importance of specific criteria adopted for the calculations. The proposed methodology was used and verified in the selection of a waste management system for the city of Szczecin.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multicriterial analysis; waste management; municipal waste; Szczecin city

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.57-63,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Generowicz A.

• Institute of Water Supply and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Krakow University of Technology, Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. BADGIE D., SAMAH M., A. A., MANAF L. A., MUDA A. B. Assessment of municipal solid waste composition in Malaysia: management, practice and Challenges, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21, 539, (3), 2012.
• 2. CHEN C. C. Evaluation of optimal application of government subsidies on recycling of recyclable waste, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 14, 137, (2), 2005.
• 3. DEN BOER E., JĘDRCZAK A., KOWALSKI Z., KULCZYCKA J., SZPADT R. A review of municipal solid waste composition and quantities in Poland. Waste Manage. 30, (3), 369, 2010.
• 4. KOWALSKI Z., KULCZYCKA J. Cleaner Production as a Basic Element for the Sustainable Development Strategy, Pol J. Chem. Technol. 6, (4), 35, 2004.
• 5. MORRISSEY A., J. BROWNE J. Waste Management Models and Their Application to Sustainable Waste Management. Waste Manage. 24, (3), 279, 2004.
• 6. PAWŁOWSKI A. The sustainable development revolution. Probl. Sust. Dev. 4, (1), 65, 2009.
• 7. PAWŁOWSKI A., PAWŁOWSKI L. Sustainable development in modern civilization, Part 1 – The environment and sustainable development. Probl. Sust. Dev. 3, (1), 53, 2008.
• 8. PAWUL M., SOBCZYK W. Environmental education in waste management as a tool for implementing sustainable development. Probl. Sust. Dev. 6, (1), 147, 2011.
• 9. SAATY T. L. Decision making for leaders. The Analytical Hierarchy Processes for decision in the complex world. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2001.
• 10. GASKA K. Optimisation of solid waste fuels formation processes. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 17, (1), 203 2008.
• 11. MIKOSZ J. Wastewater management in small communities in Poland, Desalin. Water Treat. 51, (10), 2461 2013.
• 12. GENEROWICZ A., KOWALSKI Z., KULCZYCKA J. Planning of waste management systems in urban area using multi-criteria analysis. J. Environ. Prot. 2, (6), 736, 2011.
• 13. GENEROWICZ A., KULCZYCKA J., KOWALSKI Z., BANACH M. Assessment of waste management technology using BATNEEC options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 92, (4), 1314, 2011.
• 14. GENEROWICZ A., KRASZEWSKI A. Multi-criteria analysis of the location of the incineration plant for municipal waste in Kraków. Arch. Gosp. Odpad. Ochr. Środ. 7, 73, 2008.
• 15. KARAGIANNIDIS A., MOUSSIOPOULOS N. A modelgenerating framework for regional waste management, taking local peculiarities explicitly into account. Loc. Sci. 6, (1- 4), 281, 1998.
• 16. BARLAZ M., CEKANDER G.C. , VASUKI N.C. Integrated solid waste management in the United States, J. Environ. Eng. 129, (7), 583, 2003.
• 17. GEORGOPOULOU E., HONTOU V., GAKIS N., SARAFIDIS Y., MIRASGEDIS S., LALAS D.P., LOUKATOS A., GARGOULAS N., MENTZIS A., ECONOMIDIS D., TRIANTAFILOPOULOS T., KORIZI K. BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry. J. Clean Prod. 16, (3), 359, 2008.
• 18. SAHERI S., MIR M., A., BASRI N., E., A., MAHMOOD N., Z., B., BEGUM R., A. Life cycle assessment for solid waste disposal options in Malaysia, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21, (5), 1377, 2012.
• 19. Strategic evaluation of the target system of waste management for the City of Szczecin, together with the choice of location options for waste incineration plant. 2008.
• 20. ANDERSON D.R., SWEENEY D.J. , WILLIAMS T.A. An Introduction to Management Science. Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making, 6th ed. St. Paul, West Publishing Company, 1991.
• 21. BELTON V., STEWART T.J. Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach, Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, 2002.
• 22. KLANG A., VIKMAN P A., BTATTEBŘ H. Sustainable management of demolition waste – an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 38, (4), 317, 2003.
• 23. HOKKANEN J., SALMINEN P. Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98, (1), 19 1997.