PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2014 | 158 | 09 |

Tytuł artykułu

Wpływ gryzoni na regenerację lasu z uwzględnieniem zaburzeń naturalnych i antropogenicznych

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

EN
Influence of the rodents on forest regeneration considering natural and anthropogenic disturbances

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
The role of the rodents in forest regeneration includes both negative (seed and seedlings consumption) and positive (seed dispersal) aspects. The objective of this paper is to review the knowledge of this dual effect of the rodents on forest regeneration after disturbance, particularly in temperate managed forest stands. Many studies have demonstrated that consumption of seeds and seedlings by rodents can substantially inhibit regeneration of forest stands after disturbance. Small mammal predation on oak, pine and European beech seeds and seedlings contributes to reduced forest regeneration after tree harvest and natural disturbances such as fires. On the other hand, some rodent species may promote seed dispersal towards deforested areas. Moreover, they frequently prefer nesting and caching of acorns near structures providing shelter. Such structures are abundant in disturbed areas and appear to promote higher survival of cached seeds. Furthermore, there are certain techniques of seed and seedling protection against small mammals, e.g., planting seeds in the soil, using polyethylene tubes to raise seedlings, or providing alternative food for rodents. The positive impact of the rodents can be enhanced and negative minimized through proper management, such as providing appropriate microhabitats for seed caching, or maintaining continuity of canopy cover/forest stands.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

158

Numer

09

Opis fizyczny

s.714-720,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Zakład Zoologii Systematycznej, Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, ul.Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań

Bibliografia

  • Agee J. K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  • Birkedal M., Fischer A., Karlsson M., Löf M., Madsen P. 2009. Rodent impact on establishment of direct−seeded Fagus sylvatica, Quercus robur and Quercus petraea on forest land. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24 (4): 298−307.
  • Bogdziewicz M., Wróbel A. 2012. Ekologiczne aspekty lat nasiennych u drzew. Kosmos 61: 667−675.
  • Bogdziewicz M., Zwolak R. 2014. Responses of small mammals to clear−cutting in temperate and boreal forests of Europe: a meta−analysis and review. European Journal of Forest Research 133 (1): 1−11.
  • Borchert M., Johnson M., Schreiner D. S., Vander Wall, S. B. 2003. Early postfire seed dispersal, seedling establishment and seedling mortality of Pinus coulteri (D. Don) in central coastal California, USA. Plant Ecology 168 (2): 207−220.
  • Borowski Z. 2007. Damage caused by rodents in Polish forests. International Journal of Pest Management 53 (4): 303−310.
  • Broncano M. J., Rodrigo A., Retana J. 2008. Post−dispersal seed predation in Pinus halepensis and consequences on seedling establishment after fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17 (3): 407−414.
  • Darley−Hill S., Johnson W. C. 1981. Acorn dispersal by the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata). Oecologia 50 (2): 231−232.
  • Dobrowolska D. 2007. Odnowienie naturalne lasu w drzewostanach uszkodzonych przez wiatr na terenie północno−wschodniej Polski. Leśne Prace Badawcze 2: 45−60.
  • Dobrowolska D. 2010. Rola zaburzeń w regeneracji lasu. Leśne Prace Badawcze 71 (4): 391−405.
  • García D., Obeso J. R., Martínez I. 2005. Rodent seed predation promotes differential recruitment among bird−dispersed trees in temperate secondary forests. Oecologia 144 (3): 435−446.
  • Grant P. R. 1972. Interspecific competition among rodents. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics: 79−106.
  • Gray A. N., Spies T. A. 1996. Gap size, within−gap position and canopy structure effects on conifer seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology: 635−645.
  • Grime J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley, Chichester.
  • Halle S. 1993. Wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus L.) as pioneers of recolonization in a reclaimed area. Oecologia 94 (1): 120−127.
  • Huggard D. J., Arsenault A. 2009. Conifer seed predation in harvested and burned dry Douglas−fir forests in southern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39 (8): 1548−1556.
  • Ivan J. S., Swihart R. K. 2000. Selection of mast by granivorous rodents of the central hardwood forest region. Journal of Mammalogy 81 (2): 549−562.
  • Jensen T. S. 1985. Seed−seed predator interactions of European beech, Fagus silvatica and forest rodents, Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis. Oikos: 149−156.
  • Kerr G. 2000. Natural regeneration of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra subsp. laricio) in Great Britain. Forestry 73 (5): 479−488.
  • Madsen P., Löf M. 2005. Reforestation in southern Scandinavia using direct seeding of oak (Quercus robur L.). Forestry 78 (1): 55−64.
  • Mosandl R., Kleinert A. 1998. Development of oaks (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) emerged from bird−dispersed seeds under old−growth pine (Pinus silvestris L.) stands. Forest Ecology and Management: 106 (1): 35−44.
  • Muńoz A., Bonal R. 2007. Rodents change acorn dispersal behaviour in response to ungulate presence. Oikos 116 (10): 1631−1638.
  • Nilsson U., Gemmel P., Löf M., Welander T. 1996. Germination and early growth of sown Quercus robur L. in relation to soil preparation, sowing depths and prevention against predation. New Forests 12 (1): 69−86.
  • Ostfeld R. S., Manson R. H., Canham C. D. 1997. Effects of rodents on survival of tree seeds and seedlings invading old fields. Ecology 78 (5): 1531−1542.
  • Pucek Z., Jędrzejewski W., Jędrzejewska B., Pucek M. 1993. Rodent population dynamics in a primeval deciduous forest (Białowieża National Park) in relation to weather, seed crop, and predation. Acta Theriologica 38 (2): 199−232.
  • Santos T., Tellería J. 1997. Vertebrate predation on Holm Oak, Quercus ilex, acorns in a fragmented habitat: effects on seedling recruitment. Forest Ecology and Management 98 (2): 181−187.
  • Stanturf J. A., Madsen P. 2002. Restoration concepts for temperate and boreal forests of North America and Western Europe. Plant Biosystems−An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 136 (2): 143−158.
  • Sullivan T. P. 1979. Repopulation of clear−cut habitat and conifer seed predation by deer mice. The Journal of Wildlife Management: 861−871.
  • Sullivan T. P., Klenner W. 1993. Influence of diversionary food on red squirrel populations and damage to crop trees in young lodgepole pine forest. Ecological Applications 3 (4): 708−718.
  • Sullivan T. P., Sullivan D. S. 2004. Influence of a granivorous diversionary food on population dynamics of montane voles (Microtus montanus), deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), and western harvest mice (Reithrodontomys megalotis). Crop Protection 23 (3): 191−200.
  • Szwagrzyk J. 2000. Rozległe naturalne zaburzenia w ekosystemach leśnych: ich zasięg, charakter i znaczenie dla dynamiki lasu. Wiadomości Ekologiczne 46 (1): 3−19.
  • Takahashi K., Sato K., Washitani I. 2006. The role of the wood mouse in Quercus serrata acorn dispersal in abandoned cut−over land. Forest Ecology and Management 229 (1): 120−127.
  • Takahashi K., Sato K., Washitani I. 2007. Acorn dispersal and predation patterns of four tree species by wood mice in abandoned cut−over land. Forest Ecology and Management 250 (3): 187−195.
  • Tellería J. L., Santos T., Alcántara M. 1991. Abundance and food−searching intensity of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in fragmented forests. Journal of Mammalogy 72 (1): 183−187.
  • Vander Wall S. B. 1990. Food hoarding in animals. University of Chicago Press.
  • Vander Wall S. B. 2001. The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal. The Botanical Review 67 (1): 74−117.
  • Wenny D. G. 2001. Advantages of seed dispersal: a re−evaluation of directed dispersal. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3 (1): 51−74.
  • Zwolak R., Crone E. E. 2012. Quantifying the outcome of plant−granivore interactions. Oikos 121 (1): 20−27.
  • Zwolak R., Pearson D. E., Ortega Y. K., Crone, E. E. 2010. Fire and mice: Seed predation moderates fire’s influence on conifer recruitment. Ecology 91 (4): 1124−1131.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-a8d6d87b-df1a-45c8-b7c5-576a9b7f2fc4
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.