PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 28 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Land cover and landscape diversity analysis in the West Polesie Biosphere Reserve

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of this research was to present the land cover structure and landscape diversity in the West Polesie Biosphere Reserve. The land cover classification was performed using Object Based Image Analysis in Trimble eCognition Developer 8 software. The retrospective land cover changes analysis in 3 lake catchments (Kleszczów, Moszne, Białe Włodawskie Lakes)was performed on the basis of archival aerial photos taken in 1952, 1971, 1984, 1992, 2007 and one satellite scene from 2003 (IKONOS).On the basis of land cover map structure, Shannon diversity index was estimated with the moving window approach enabled in Fragstats software. The conducted research has shown that the land cover structure of the West Polesie Biosphere Reserve is diverse and can be simply described by selected landscape metrics. The highest level of land cover diversity, as showed by Shannon Diversity Index, was identified in the western part of the West Polesie Biosphere Reserve, which is closely related to the agricultural character of land cover structure in those regions. The examples of three regional retrospective land cover analyses demonstrated that the character of land cover structure has changed dramatically over the last 40 years.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

28

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.153-162,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Institute of Soil Science, Environment Engineering and Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland
  • Department of Landscape Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Dobrzanskiego 37/028, 20-262 Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Department of Forest Ecology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Abrishamkesh S., Gorj M., and Asadi H., 2011. Long-term effects of land use on soil aggregate stability. Int. Agrophys., 25, 103-108.
  • Anaya-Romero M., Pino R., Moreira J., M., Mużoz-Rojas M., and de la Rosa D., 2011. Analysis of soil capability versus land use change by using CORINE land cover and MicroLEIS. Int. Agrophys., 25, 395-398.
  • Antrop M., 2005. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape Urban Plan., 70, 21-34.
  • Baatz M. and Schape A., 2000. Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multiscale image segmentation. XII Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung, Wichmann Press, Heidelberg, 12-23.
  • Bagheri N., Ahmadi H., Alavipanah S.K., and Omid M., 2012. Soil-line vegetation indices for corn nitrogen content prediction Int. Agrophys., 26, 103-108.
  • Baldwin D.J.B., Weaver K., Schnekenburger F., andPerera A.H., 2004. Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landscapes: implications for their use innatural disturbance emulation. Landscape Ecol., 19, 255-271.
  • Białousz S., Chmiel J., Fijałkowska A., and Różycki S., 2010. The use of satellite imagery and GIS tools in the soillandscape unit update process - example of small scale studies (in Polish). Archives Photogrammetry, Cartography Remote Sensing, 21, 21-32.
  • Blaschke T., 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sensing, 65(1), 2-16.
  • Chmiel J., Fijałkowska A., and Woronkiewicz Ł., 2007. VHR satellite scene analysis for obtaining data on land cover-pixel and object base approach. Archives Photogrammetry, Cartography Remote Sensing, 17a, 139-148.
  • Chmielewsi T.J., 2012. Landscape Systems, Structure, Function, Planning. National Scientific Press, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Chmielewski T.J. (Ed.), 2005. West Polesie Biosphere Reserve. Values, operation, development perspectives. Poleski National Park, Governor of Lublin, Lublin-Urszulin, Poland.
  • Chmielewski T.J. and Piasecki D. (Ed.), 2010. The Future of Hydrogenic Landscapes in European Biosphere Reserves. University of Life Sciences in Lublin – Polesie National Park – Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin National UNESCO-MaB Committee of Poland, Lublin, Poland.
  • Ciołkosz A., Guzik C., Luc M., and Trzepacz P., 2011. Land use changes in the Polish Carpathian Mts. from 1988 to 200 (in Polish). Jagiellonian University Press, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Cracov, Poland, 1-135.
  • De Groot R., 2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan., 75, 175-186.
  • Drzewiecki W., Wężyk P., Pierzchalski M., and Szafraska B., 2013. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of soil erosion risk in Małopolska (Poland), supported by an object-based analysis of high-resolution satellite images. Pure Appl. Geophysics, 170(4), DOI 10.1007/s00024-013-0669-7.
  • Eden G., Kayadjanian M., and Vidal C., 2000.Quantifying Landscape Structure: spatial and temporal dimension. In: From Land Cover to Landscape Diversity in the European Union,
  • Fisher P., Comber A., and Wadsworth R., 2005. Land use and cover: contradiction or complement. In: Re-presenting GIS (Eds P. Fisher, D.J. Unwin). Wiley Press, London, UK.
  • Gustafson E.J., 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems, 1, 143-156.
  • Hay G. and Castilla G., 2006. Object-based image analysis: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT), (Eds S. Lang, T. Blaschke, E. Schöpfer). Workshop Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Object-based Image Analysis, July 4-5, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Jankowski W., 1977. Activities of Commission on Land Use of the International Geographical Union in 1949-1976 (in Polish). Przegląd Geograficzny, 49(4), 843-852.
  • Jansen L.J.M. and Gregorio A., 2003. Land-use data collection using the ‘land cover classification system’: results from a case study in Kenya. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 131-148.
  • Kollas C., Lasch P., Rock J., and Suckow F., 2009. Bioenergy potential in Germany – assessing spatial patterns of biomass productionwith aspen short-rotation coppice. Int. Agrophys., 23, 343-352.
  • Kostrzewski M.,Waller P., Guertin P.,Haberland J.,Colaizzi P., Barnes E., Thompson T.,Clarke T.,Riley E., and Choi C., 2002. Ground-based remote sensing of water and nitrogen stress. J. Trans. ASABE, 46(1), 29-38.
  • Lewiński S., 2007. Object base and traditional pixel base classification process comparison from the point of view of automating the process of creating of land use and land cover database.Year book of geomatics, 5(1), 63-70.
  • Mahmoodabadi M., 2011. Sediment yield estimation using a semiquantitative model and GIS-remote sensing data. Int. Agrophys., 25, 241-247.
  • Mas J., F., Gao Y., Antonio J., and Pacheco N., 2010. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to classification approaches. Forest Ecology Manag., 259, 1215-1224.
  • McAlpine Clive A. and Eyre Teresa J., 2002. Testing land- scape metrics as indicators of habitat loss and fragmentation in continuous eucalypt forests (Queensland, Australia). Landscape Ecol., 17(8), 711-728.
  • McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C., and Ene E., 2002. FRAGSTATS v3: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html RapidEye, 2010. RapidEye Standard Image Product Specification, Version 3.0, Germany, www.rapideye.de Saadat H.,Adamowski J.,Bonnell R., Sharifi F.,NamdarM., and Ale-Ebrahim S., 2011. Land use and land cover classification over a large area in Iran based on single date analysis of satellite imagery. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sensing, 66, 608-619.
  • Szostak M., Wężyk P., and Tompalski P., 2013. Aerial orthophoto and airborne laser scanning as monitoring tools for and cover dynamics: a case study from the Milicz Forest District (Poland). Pure Appl. Geophysics, 170(40), 493-744.
  • Tansey K., Chambers I., Anstee A., Denniss A., and Lamb A., 2009. Object-oriented classification of very high resolution airborne imagery for the extraction of hedgerows and field margin cover in agricultural areas. Appl. Geography, 29, 145-157.
  • Tompalski P. and Wężyk P., 2012. LiDAR and VHRS data for assessing living quality in cities – an approach based on 3D spatial indices. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., 39(B6), 173-176.
  • Turner B.L., Lambin E.F., and Reenberg A., 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS, 104, 20666-20671.
  • Turner M.G., O'Neill R.V., Gardner R.H., and Milne B.T., 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3, 153-162.
  • Uuemaa E., Antrop M., Roosaare J., Marja R., and Mander Ü., 2009. Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Rev. Landsc. Res., 3, 1-28.
  • Uuemaa E., Mander Ü., and Marja R., 2013. Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecological Indicators, 28, 100-106.
  • Verburg P.H., van de Steeg J., Veldkamp A., and Willemen L., 2009. From land cover to land function dynamics. A major challenge to improve land characterization. J. Environ. Manag., 90, 1327-1335.
  • Wężyk P., Kok R., and Kozioł K., 2006. Application of the object based image analysis of VHR satellite images in landuse classification. Roczniki Geomatyki, IV(3), 227-238.
  • Wężyk P. and Matyja W., 2007. Dynamic of changes assessment in Niep³omice Forest based on archival orthophotomap from 1949. Archives Photogrammetry, Cartography Remote Sensing, 17b, 801-809.
  • Zaragozí B., Belda A., Linares J., Martínez-Pérez J., Navarro J.T., and Esparza J., 2012.Afree and open source programming library for landscape metrics calculations. Environ. Modelling Software, 31, 131-140.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-a895bb32-f6c9-4418-944e-c20e7d9d8f5f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.