Selectivity of nicosulfuron isolated or in tank mixture to glyphosate and sulfonylurea tolerant soybean

• Autorzy: Silva A.F.M. , Albrecht A.J.P. , Damiao V.W. , Giraldeli A.L. , de Marco L.R. , Placido H.F. , Albrecht L.P. , Filho R.V.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the present work was to evaluate the selectivity of nicosulfuron, alone and in combinations, applied in post-emergence (V4) of glyphosate and sulfonylurea tolerant (RR/STS) soybean. The experiments were conducted in 2015/16 and 2016/17, in Piracicaba – state of São Paulo (SP). In 2016/17, the experiment was also conducted in Palotina – state of Paraná (PR). The experiment was a randomized block design, with four repetitions and 16 treatments, with combinations of nicosulfuron, glyphosate, chlorimuron, sulfometuron and cloransulam, applied alone or in tank mixture. Crop injury and variables related to agronomic performance were evaluated. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and treatment means were compared by the Tukey test. The results obtained are significant in the positioning of herbicides in RR/STS soybean, since in the five experiments, all the treatments were selective, except for glyphosate + sulfometuron which reduced the yield of a cultivar (CD 2630 RR/STS) in the 2015/16 season.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

selectivity; nicosulfuron; tank mixture; glyphosate; sulphonylurea; soybean; Glycine max; chlorimuron; cloransulam; herbicide; crop; tolerance; sulphometuron

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Plant Protection Research
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 58
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.152-160,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Silva A.F.M.

• Department of Crop Science, University of Sao Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Av.Padua Dias, 11 - Agronomia, 13418–900 Piracicaba, Brazil

autor

Albrecht A.J.P.

• Department of Agronomic Sciences, Federal University of Parana, Parana, Brazil

autor

Damiao V.W.

• Department of Crop Science, University of Sao Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Av.Padua Dias, 11 - Agronomia, 13418–900 Piracicaba, Brazil

autor

Giraldeli A.L.

• Department of Crop Science, University of Sao Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Av.Padua Dias, 11 - Agronomia, 13418–900 Piracicaba, Brazil

autor

de Marco L.R.

• Department of Crop Science, University of Sao Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Av.Padua Dias, 11 - Agronomia, 13418–900 Piracicaba, Brazil

autor

Placido H.F.

• Department of Crop Science, University of Sao Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Av.Padua Dias, 11 - Agronomia, 13418–900 Piracicaba, Brazil

autor

Albrecht L.P.

• Department of Agronomic Sciences, Federal University of Parana, Parana, Brazil

autor

Filho R.V.

• Department of Crop Science, University of Sao Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Av.Padua Dias, 11 - Agronomia, 13418–900 Piracicaba, Brazil

Bibliografia

• Albrecht L.P., Alonso D.G., Albrecht A.J.P., Oliveira J.R., Braccini A.L., Constantin J. 2012. Effect of glyphosate and associations in post-emergence on the agronomic performance and quality of RR® soybean seeds. Planta Daninha 30 (1): 139–146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000100016
• Albrecht A.J.P., Silva A.F.M., Albrecht L.P., Pereira V.G.C., Krenchinski F.H., Migliavacca R.A., Victoria Filho R. 2017. Effect of sulfonylureas application on RR/STS soybean. Brazilian Journal of Agriculture 92 (1): 37–49.
• Anderson A.H., Simmons F.W. 2004. Use of the sulfonylureatolerant soybean trait to reduce soybean response to prosulfuron soil residues. Weed Technology 18 (3): 521–526.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-062R1
• Bentivegna D.J., Moyano G.L., Daddario J.F.F., Tucat G. 2017. Determination of optimal doses of glyphosate for controlling weeds at several stages in southwestern Buenos Aires province (Argentina). Journal of Plant Protection Research 57 (4): 347–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2017-0047
• Céleres. 2018. Projeção de safra – Soja – fevereiro 2018. Available on: http://www.celeres.com.br/ic18-02-projecao-de-safrasoja-fevereiro-2018/
• Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB). 2018. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira: grãos: safra 2017/18, quinto levantamento, fevereiro de 2018. CONAB, Brasília, DF, BR, 142 pp.
• Durner J., Gailus V., Böger P. 1991. New aspects on inhibition of plant acetolactate synthase depend on flavin adenine dinucleotide. Plant Physiology 81 (4): 1144–1149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.95.4.1144
• Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA). 2013. Tecnologias de produção de soja: região central do Brasil 2014. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, BR, 266 pp.
• Ghio C., Ramos M.L., Altieri E., Bulos M., Sala C.A. 2013. Molecular characterization of Als1, an acetohydroxyacid synthase mutation conferring resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126 (12): 2957–2968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2185-7
• Green J.M. 2007. Review of glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicide crop resistance and resistant weed management. Weed Technology 21 (2): 547–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-004.1
• Heap I. 2018. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available on: http://www.weedscience.org/Summary/MOA.aspx
• Jeffries M.D., Mahoney D.J., Gannon T.W. 2014. Effect of simulated indaziflam drift rates on various plant species. Weed Technology 28 (4): 608–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-14-00004.1
• Manley B.S., Wilson H.P., Hines T.E. 2001. Weed management and crop rotations influence populations of several broadleaf weeds. Weed Science 49 (1): 106–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0106:WMACRI]2.0.CO;2
• Menendez J., Jorrin J., Romera E., De Prado R. 1994. Resistance to chlorotoluron of a slender foxtail (Alopecurus-myosuroides) biotype. Weed Science 42 (3): 340–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500076591
• Merotto Júnior A., Vidal R.A., Fleck N.G. 2000. Tolerance of the soybean cultivar Coodetec 201 to ALS inhibitor herbicides. Planta Daninha 18 (1): 93–102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582000000100010.
• Mian M.A.R., Shipe E.R., Alvernaz J., Mueller J.D., Ashley D.A., Boerma H.R. 1997. RFLP analysis of chlorimuron ethyl sensitivity in soybean. Journal of Heredity 88 (1): 38–41.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023053
• Nandula V.K., Poston D.H., Reddy K.N., Whiting K. 2009. Response of soybean to halosulfuron herbicide. International Journal of Agronomy 2009: 1–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/754510
• Nolte S.A., Young B.G. 2002. Efficacy and economic return on investment for conventional and herbicide-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 16 (2): 388–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0388:EAEROI]2.0.CO;2
• Piasecki C., Rizzardi M.A. 2016. Does pre-emergence herbicides control individual plants and clumps of volunteer corn RR® F2 in soybean? Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 15 (4): 323–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v15i4.497
• Pimentel-Gomes F., Garcia C.H. 2002. Estatística aplicada a experimentos agronômicos e florestais: exposição com exemplos e orientações para uso de aplicativos. FEALQ, Piracicaba, SP, BR. 309 pp.
• Poston D.H., Nandula V.K., Koger C.H., Griffin R.M. 2008. Preemergence herbicides effect on growth and yield of early-planted Mississippi soybean. Crop Management 7: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CM-2008-0218-02-RS
• Porterfield D., Everman W.J., Wilcut J.W. 2006. Soybean response to residual and in-season treatments of trifloxysulfuron. Weed Technology 20 (2): 384–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-033R.1
• Puricelli E., Faccini D., Metzler M., Torres P. 2015. Differential susceptibility of Conyza bonariensis biotypes to glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicides in Argentina. Agricultural Sciences 6 (1): 22–30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2015.61003
• Riar D.S., Norsworthy J.K., Steckel L.E., Stephenson IV D.O., Eubank T.W., Bond J., Scott R.C. 2013. Adoption of best management practices for herbicide-resistant weeds in midsouthern united states cotton, rice, and soybean. Weed Technology 27 (4): 788–797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00087.1
• Rodrigues B.N., Almeida F.S. 2011. Guia de herbicidas, 6th ed. Editing authors, Londrina, PR, BR, 697 pp.
• Rogozin I.B., Berikov V.B., Vasunina E.A., Sinitsina O.I. 2001. The effect of the primary structure of DNA on induction of mutations by alkylating agents. Russian Journal of Genetics 37 (6): 704–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016641812010
• Roso A.C., Vidal R.A. 2011. Culturas resistentes aos herbicidas inibidores da enzima ALS: revisão de literatura. Pesticidas: Revista de Ecotoxicologia e Meio Ambiente 21: 13–24. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/pes.v21i0.25849
• Silva A.F.M., Albrecht A.J.P., Albrecht L.P., Victoria Filho R., Giovanelli B.F. 2016. Application of post-emergence als inhibitor herbicides associated or not to glyphosate in RR/STS soybean. Planta Daninha 34 (4): 765–775. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582016340400017
• Velini D.E., Osipe R., Gazziero D.LP. 1995. Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. SBCPD, Londrina, PR, BR. 42 pp.
• Walter K.L., Strachan S.D., Ferry N.M., Albert H.H., Castle L.A., Sebastian S.A. 2014. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1 and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean. Pest Management Science 70 (12): 1831–1839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3725

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/122930