PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 55[2] |

Tytuł artykułu

Meat quality of fattening pigs born from sows fed different diets during early pregnancy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

PL
Jakość mięsa tuczników pochodzących od loch żywionych odmiennie w ciąży niskiej

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Meatquality of fattening pigs born from sows fed different diets during early pregnancy. The aim of the study was to determine the pork quality of fattening pigs (Polish Landrace ´Polish Large White ´Duroc) originated from sows fed during early pregnancy (41 to 70 days) with diets differing in quantity and quality (LD1 vs LK sows – 130% of recommendations, LD2 sows – energy supplement). Thirty-six weaners from LK, LD1 and LD2 sows were selected for fattening and assigned to groups K, D1 and D2 (12 animals per group). Fatteners were fed in 3 phases and kept under standardized environmental conditions (individual pens, constant access to water). Better growth rate in the offspring was obtained as a result of temporarily more intense feeding of pregnant sows with increased daily rations. Modification of the sow diets had no appreciable effect on the slaughter traits of the fatteners postmortem, which shows that there are no contraindications for temporary changes in the feeding of pregnant sows. Good and uniform meatiness of the fatteners in the control and experimental groups was obtained. Chemical composition and physical characteristics of the meat were similar among the groups and the meat was of good quality. Statistically significant differences between the groups were found for several traits: crude ash content, a* colour value, and the proportion of C17:1 and C18:2 n-6 acids.
PL
Jakość mięsa tuczników pochodzących od loch żywionych odmiennie w ciąży niskiej. Celem pracy było określenie jakości wieprzowiny pozyskanej od tuczników (pbz x wbp x duroc), których matki w okresie ciąży niskiej żywiono okresowo, od 41. do 70. dnia jej trwania paszą, której ilość lub jakość zróżnicowano (lochy LD1 vs LK - dawka większa o 30% w stosunku do norm, lochy LD2 - dodatek energetyczny). Do tuczu wybrano 36 warchlaków od loch LK, LD1, LD2 i przydzielono do grup K, D1, D2 po 12 sztuk. Tuczniki żywiono systemem 3. fazowym i utrzymywano w ujednoliconych warunkach środowiska (kojce pojedyncze, stały dostęp do wody). W efekcie zastosowanego okresowo intensywniejszego żywienia loch prośnych poprzez zwiększenie dziennej dawki paszy uzyskano u potomstwa lepsze tempo wzrostu. Modyfikacje żywienia matek nie miały znaczącego wpływu na cechy rzeźne tuczników określone poubojowo, co wskazuje na brak przeciwskazań do okresowych zmian żywienia loch prośnych. Uzyskano dobrą, wyrównaną w grupach kontrolnej i doświadczalnych mięsność tuczników. Skład chemiczny mięsa i jego cechy fizyczne były na zbliżonym poziomie w grupach, mięso było dobrej jakości. Różnice istotne statystycznie między grupami potwierdzono dla nielicznych cech: zawartości popiołu surowego, wartości a* barwy oraz udziału kwasów C17:1 i C18:2 n6.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

Opis fizyczny

p.241-251,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Production, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Production, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Production, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Production, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

  • BEAULIEU A.D., AALHUS J.L., WILLIAMS N.H., PATIENCE J.F., 2010: Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition and eating quality of pork. J. Anim. Sci. 88: 2767-2778.
  • ANDRÉS A.I., CAVA R., MAYORAL A.I., TEJEDA J.F., MORCUENDE D., RUIZ J., 2001: Oxidative stability and fatty acid composition of pig muscles as affected by rearing system, crossbreeding and metabolic type of muscle fibre. Meat Sci. 59: 39-47.
  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 1990: Official Methods of Analysis of the Associated Official Analytical Chemists. Charter 32. Washington, DC.
  • BÉRARD J., KREUZER M., BEE G., 2008: Effect of litter size and birth weight on growth, carcass and pork quality, and their relationship to postmortem proteolysis. J. Anim. Sci. 86: 2357-2368.
  • CERISUELO A., BAUCELLS M.D., GASA J., COMA J., CARRION D., CHAPINAL N., SALA R., 2009: Increased sow nutrition during midgestation affects muscle fiber development and meat quality, with no consequences on growth performance. J.Anim. Sci. 87: 729-739.
  • De SMET S., RAES K., DEMEYER D., 2004: Meat fatty acid composition as affected by fatness and genetic factors: a review. Anim. Res. 53: 81-98.
  • DU M., TONG J., ZHAO J., UNDERWOOD K.R., ZHU M., FORD S.P., NATHANIELSZE P.W., 2010: Fetal programming of skeletal muscle development in ruminant animals. J. Anim. Sci. 88 (E Suppl.): 51-60.
  • DWYER C.M., STICKLAND N.C., FLETCHER J.M., 1994: The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and subsequent postnatal growth. J. Anim. Sci. 72: 911-917.
  • EN-ISO 5509, 2001: Animal and vegetable fats and oils: Preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids.
  • ENSER M., RICHARDSON R.I., WOOD J.D., GILL B.P., SHEARD P.R., 2000: Feeding linseed to increase the n-3 PUFA of pork: fatty acid composition of muscle, adipose tissue, liver and sausages. Meat Sci. 55: 201-212.
  • FORTIN A., CLOWES E.J., SCHAEFER A.L., 2003: Gestational and lactational feeding strategies for gilts: growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality of the progeny. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 205-211.
  • GONDRET F., LEFAUCHEUR L., LOUVEAU I., LEBRET B., PICHODO X., Le COZLER Y, 2005: Influence of piglet birth weight on postnatal growth performance tissue lipogenic capacity and muscle histological traits at market weight. Livest. Prod. Sci. 93: 137-146.
  • GRAU R., HAMM R., 1952: Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Wasser­bindung in Fleisch. Fleischwirtschaft 4: 295-297.
  • HEYER A., ANDERSSON H.K., LINBERG J.E., LUNDSTROM K., 2004: Effect of extra maternal feed supply in early gestation on sow and piglet performance and production and meat quality of growing/ /finishing pigs. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A, Anim. Sci. 54: 44-55.
  • KOCZANO W SKI J.,MIGDAŁW., BOROWIEC F., KLOCEK C., 2002: Fatty acid profile in longissimus dorsi muscle as an effect of different fatty acid composition in diets of fatteners slaughtered at different stages of fattening. Ann. Anim. Sci. (Suppl.) 2: 249-252.
  • LATTORE M.A., LAZARO R., VALENCIA D.G., MEDEL P., MATEOS G.G., 2004: The effects of gender and slaughter weight on the growth performance carcass traits and meat quality characteristics of heavy pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 526-533.
  • LAWLOR P.G., LYNCH P.B., O’CONNELL M.K., MCNAMARA L., REID P., STICKLAND N.C., 2007: The influence of over feeding sows during gestation on reproductive performance and pig growth to slaughter. Archiv. Anim. Breed. 50: 82-91.
  • McNAMARAL.B., GIBLIN L., MARKHAM T., STICKLAND N.C., BERRY D.P., O’REILLY J., LYNCH P.B., KERRY J.P., LAWLOR P.G., 2011: Nutritional intervention during gestation alters growth, body composition and gene expression patterns in skeletal muscle of pig off­spring. Animal 5: 1195-1206.
  • MUSSER R.E., DAVIS D.L., TOKACH M.D., NELSSEN J.L., DRITZ S.S., GOODBAND R.D., 2006: Effects of high feed intake during early gestation on sow performance and offspring growth and carcass characteristics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 127 (3): 187-199.
  • OKSBJERG N., NISSEN P.M., THERKILDSEN M., MRLLER H.S., LARSEN L.B., ANDERSEN M., YOUNG J.F., 2013: In utero nutrition related to fetal development, postnatal performance and meat quality of pork. J. Anim. Sci. 91: 1443-1453.
  • POHJA N.S., NINIVAARA F.P., 1957: Die Estimmung der Wasserbindung des Fleisches mittels der Konstandruck- methods. Fleischwirtschaft 9: 193-195.
  • Polish Swine Nutrition Requirements, 1993: The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition. Omnitech­Press, Warszawa.
  • RAES K., De SMET S., DEMEYER D., 2004: Effect of dietary fatty acids on in­corporation of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in lamb, beef and pork meet: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 113: 199-221.
  • Rozporządzenie Ministra Rolnictwa i Roz­woju Wsi z dnia 9 września 2004 r. w sprawie kwalifikacji osób uprawnio­nych do zawodowego uboju oraz warunków i metod uboju i uśmiercania zwierząt (in Polish). Dz.U. 2004 nr 205, poz. 2102.
  • REHFELDT C., KUHN G., 2006: Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (E. Suppl.): 113-123.
  • REHFELDT C., STABENOW B., PFUHL R., BLOCK J., NÜRNBERG G., OTTEN W., METGES C.C., KALBE C., 2012: Effects of limited and excess protein in­takes of pregnant gilts on carcass quality and cellular properties of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue in fat­tening pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 90: 184-196.
  • REKIEL A., WIĘCEK J., BATORSKA M., KULISIEWICZ J., 2015: Effect of Piglet Birth Weight on Carcass Muscle and Fat Content and Pork Quality - A Review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 15 (2): 271-287.
  • ŚWIĄTKIEWICZ M., 2010: The effect of feeding intensity of pregnant and lactating sows on their reproductive indices, meat quality and fattening results of progeny (in Polish). Roczn. Nauk. Zoot. Monogr. Rozpr.: 1-85.
  • ULBRICHT T.L.V., SOUTHGATE D.A.T., 1991: Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors. Lancet 338: 985-992.
  • WOOD J.D., WISEMAN J., COLE D.J.A., 1994: Control and manipulation of meat quality. (In:) Principles of pig science. Nottingham University Press Notting­ham: 433-456.
  • ZYBERT A., SIECZKOWSKA H., KRZĘCIO-NIECZYPORUK E., ANTOSIK K., KOĆWIN-PODSIADŁA M., ZALEWSKI R., TARCZYŃSKI K., 2015: The influence of hot carcass weight on meatiness and selected quality characteristics of the meat of pigs selected from the total population (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 11 (1): 93-102.

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-a628415c-1995-4363-9b88-ca3286e276da