Lasy odroślowe w Europie – tradycja, stan obecny i perspektywy

• Autorzy: Gil W.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Coppice forest in Europe – tradition, current status and prospects

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Coppice belongs to the oldest forestry models in Europe and is still cultivated in some regions. Despite the smaller productivity compared to high forests, coppice forests are important for protection of natural values, cultural heritage, production of small−sized timber, mitigation of climate changes, provision of non−wood products as well as providing a protective and recreational function. The most important forms of coppice management are simple coppice and coppice with standards. The varieties of the previous include short rotation coppice and selection coppice. In addition, there are two other management systems, that use vegetative regrowth of individual trees – pollarding and shredding. In 2000, the area of European forests and plantations regenerated in a vegetative way by stump shoots, stool shoots and suckers, amounted to about 23 million hectares (16% of the area of production forests). These forests consist of primarily native European trees species, but in some regions there are plantations of alien species, generally grown in short production cycles: eucalyptus, black locust and American poplar varieties. The paper analyzed the area of coppice forests in selected European countries. Our continent can be divided into three zones in terms of the use of coppice management system: Central Europe, Great Britain and Ireland (I), Mediterranean countries (II) and the Baltic countries, located north of Poland (III). The area of coppice forests in the majority of countries in zone I is small due to the process of their conversion to high forests, that has been progressing since the second half of the twentieth century. Coppice forests are of particular importance in the Mediterranean countries, where they are still a reservoir of biodiversity and an important source of wood and non−wood products. In zone III, due to the superiority of coniferous species in forests, there is no tradition of coppice management. On the other hand, there is growing interest in short rotation coppice for the production of biomass. Such attitude, currently observed in many European countries, is not only because of climate protection, but also of cultural tradition and biodiversity. That is why in some countries, the return to this traditional form of forest management is supported by the state. Coppice forests can be, especially for small private owners, a rational model of forest management.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; gospodarka lesna; gospodarstwa odroslowe; uzytkowanie lasu; lasy niskopienne; Europa; lasy odroslowe zob.lasy niskopienne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 162
• Numer: 07
• Opis fizyczny: s.555-562,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Gil W.

• Zakład Hodowli Lasu i Genetyki Drzew Leśnych, Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, Sękocin Stary, ul.Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn

Bibliografia

• Benes J., Cizek O., Dovala J., Konvicka M. 2006. Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterflies: The story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and Management 237: 353-365.
• Berg Ĺ. 2002. Breeding birds in short-rotation coppices on farmland in central Sweden – the importance of Salix height and adjacent habitats. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 90: 265-276.
• Bruckman V. J., Yan S., Hochbichler E., Glatzel G. 2011. Carbon pools and temporal dynamics along a rotation period in Quercus dominated high forest and coppice with standards stands. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 1853-1862.
• Buckley G. P. 1992. Ecology and management of coppice woodlands. London and New York: Chapman & Hall.
• Deconchat M., Balent G. 2001. Vegetation and bird community dynamics in fragmented coppice forests. Forestry 74 (2): 105-118.
• Fuller R. J., Green G. H. 1998. Effects of woodland structure on breeding bird populations in stands of coppiced lime (Tilia cordata) in western England over a 10-year period. Forestry 71 (3): 199-218.
• Harmer R., Howe J. 2003. The silviculture and management of coppice woodlands. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
• Hochbichler E. 2009. Coppice forestry in Austria. W: Marusak R., Kratochvilova Z., Trnkova E., Hajnala M. [red.]. Forest, Wildlife and Wood Sciences for Society Development – Conference proceedings. Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague. 19-35.
• Holscher D., Schade E., Leuschner C. 2001. Effects of coppicing in temperate deciduous forests on ecosystem nutrient pools and soil fertility. Basic and Applied Ecology 164: 155-164.
• Ilmurzyński E. 1969. Szczegółowa hodowla lasu. PWRiL, Warszawa.
• Jarman R., Kofman P. D. 2017. Coppice in Brief. COST Action FP1301 Reports. Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Germany.
• Jones M. 1986. Coppice wood management in the eighteenth century: an example from County Wicklow. Irish Forestry 43 (1): 15-31.
• Magagnotti N., Schweier J. [red.]. 2017. Coppice Products. COST Action FP1301 Reports. Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Germany.
• Mairota P., Manetti M. C., Amorini E., Pelleri F., Terradura M., Frattegiani M., Savini P., Grohmann F., Mori P., Terzuolo P. G. Piussi P. 2016. Opportunities for coppice management at the landscape level: the Italian experience. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 918.
• Matthews J. D. 1996. Silvicultural systems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Müller S., Rusterholc H. P., Baur B. 2006. Effects of forestry practices on relict plant species on limestone cliffs in the northern Swiss Jura mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 237: 227-236.
• Nicolescu V.-N., Bartlett D., Buckley P., Rossney D., Pyttel P., Unrau A. 2017a. National Perspectives on Coppice from 35 EuroCoppice Member Countries. COST Action FP1301 Reports. Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Germany.
• Nicolescu V.-N., Carvalho J., Hochbichler E., Bruckman V., Piqué-Nicolau M., Hernea C., Viana H., Štochlová P., Ertekin M., Tijardovic M., Dubravac T., Vandekerkhove K., Kofman P. D., Rossney D., Unrau A. 2017b. Silvicultural guidelines for European coppice forests. COST Action FP1301 Reports. Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Germany.
• Niemczyk M., Kaliszewski A., Jewiarz M., Wróbel M., Mudryk K. 2018. Productivity and biomass characteristics of selected poplar (Populus spp.) cultivars under the climatic conditions of northern Poland. Biomass and Bioenergy 111: 46-51.
• Ostermann R., Reif A. 2000. Socioeconomical and ecological aspects of coppice woods history in the Lower Vosges (France) and the Black Forest (Germany). W: Agnoletti M. [red.]. Methods and Approaches in forest history: IUFRO Research Series 3. GBR:CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon. 107-118.
• Piussi P. 2006. Close to nature forestry criteria and coppice management. W: Diaci J. [red.]. Nature-based forestry in central Europe: alternatives to industrial forestry and strict preservation. 27-37.
• Pliu-ra A., Suchockas V., Sarsekova D., Gudynaite V. 2014. Genotypic variation and heritability of growth and adaptive traits, and adaptation of young poplar hybrids at northern margins of natural distribution of Populus nigra in Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy 70: 513-529.
• Rédei K., Veperdi I., Osváth-Bujtás Z., Bagaméry G., Barna T. 2007. La gestion du robinier en Hongrie. Foręt--entreprise 177: 44-49.
• Sokołowski S. 1912. Hodowla lasu. Lwów.
• Stajic B., Zlatanov T., Velichkov I., Dubravac T., Trajkov P. 2009. Past and recent coppice forest management in some regions of south eastern Europe. Silva Balcanica 10 (1): 9-19.
• State of Europe’s Forests. 2015. Forest Europe.
• Szymura T. H. 2010. Tradycyjna gospodarka odroślowa w Europie Środkowej i jej wpływ na różnorodność biologiczną. Sylwan 154 (8): 545-551.
• Tullus A., Rytter L., Tullus T. 2012. Short-rotation forestry with hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L.×P. tremuloides Michx.) in Northern Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27 (1): 10-29.
• Zasady hodowli lasu. 1979. Wydanie IV. PWRiL, Warszawa.
• Zasady hodowli lasu. 2012. CILP, Warszawa.
• Zasady hodowli lasu obowiązujące w Państwowym Gospodarstwie Leśnym. 2003. OWRLP, Bedoń.
• Zasady techniczno-hodowlane obowiązujące w Państwowym Gospodarstwie Leśnym. 1953. PWRiL, Warszawa.