Simulating land use structure optimization based on an improved multi-objective differential evolution algorithm

• Autorzy: Wang S.-D. , Zhang H.-B. , Wang X.-C.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Optimizing land use structure is currently a hot research topic in the land resource management field. In this study, we constructed a new land use structure optimization model based on the improved multi-objective differential evolution algorithm. This model made improvements in two aspects of the classic differential evolution algorithm, i.e., control parameters and adaptive strategies. On this basis, we established a multi-objective function by taking ecological benefits and economic benefits as the objectives. According to the real situation of the study area, we established multiple constraint conditions and finally established an improved multi-objective differential evolution model. By taking the year 2010 as the base period, we simulated an optimized land use quantitative structure in 2020 for the study area and compared this optimized structure with classic linear programming. The experimental results showed that although the annual ecological benefits in the study area decreased by 5,105,300 yuan, the annual economic benefits increased by 69,133,500 yuan, and the annual total benefits increased by 20,878,300 yuan – an increase of 0.44%. This showed that the land use structure obtained by using the optimization model proposed in this paper was more reasonable. The results indicated that the model established in this study possessed quite good properties and could meet the requirements for the regional land use structure optimization under multiple constraint conditions. The optimized results can provide the scientific basis for formulating appropriate measures for regional land resources use.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.887-889,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wang S.-D.

• School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, China

autor

Zhang H.-B.

• School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, China

autor

Wang X.-C.

• School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, China

Bibliografia

• 1. DEB K., JAIN H. An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18, 577, 2014.
• 2. GOBEYN S., VOLK M., DOMINGUEZ-GRANDA L., GOETHALS P.L.M. Input variable selection with a simple genetic algorithm for conceptual species distribution models: A case study of river pollution in Ecuador. Environmental Modelling & Software. 92, 269, 2017.
• 3. HERZIG A., DYMOND J., AUSSEIL A-G. Exploring limits and trade-offs of irrigation and agricultural intensification in the Ruamahanga catchment, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 59, 216, 2016.
• 4. IBRAHIM A., RAHNAMAYAN S., MARTIN M.V. DEB K. EliteNSGA-III: An Improved Evolutionary many-Objective Optimization Algorithm. Evol. Comput. (CEC), 2016 IEEE Congr. 63, 973, 2016.
• 5. ADRIANA M., VALCU-LISMAN, CATHERINE L. K., PHILIP W. G. The optimality of using marginal land for bioenergy crops: Tradeoffs between food, fuel, and environmental services. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 45, 217, 2016.
• 6. CHONGFENG R., PING G., QIAN T., LIUDONG Z. A multi-objective fuzzy programming model for optimal use of irrigation water and land resources under uncertainty in Gansu Province. Journal of Cleaner Production. 164, 85, 2017.
• 7. PIYUSH K., JAY M.R. Mixed integer linear programming approaches for land use planning that limit urban sprawl. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 102, 33, 2016.
• 8. MAHMOUD M., MAHIN N., ALIREZA S. Development, application, and comparison of hybrid meta-heuristics for urban land-use allocation optimization: Tabu search, genetic, GRASP, and simulated annealing algorithms. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 60, 23, 2016.
• 9. Noszczyk T., Rutkowska A., Hernik J. Determining changes in land use structure in małopolska using statistical methods. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 26, 1, 2017.
• 10. JOSIAH A., FRED O. Differential evolution algorithm for solving multi-objective crop planning model. Agricultural Water Management. 97, 848, 2010.
• 11. JOSIAH A., FRED O. Differential evolution algorithm for solving multi-objective crop planning model. Agricultural Water Management. 97, 848, 2010.
• 12. CHEN Y., ZHAO J.S., CHEN Y.Y. ENVI based urban green space information extraction with high resolution remote sensing data. Engineering of Surveying and Mapping. 24, 33, 2015.
• 13. STORN R., PRICE K. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Berkeley, CA, Technical Report TR-95-012, 1995.
• 14. STORN R., PRICE K. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J.Glob.Optim.11, 341, 1997.
• 15. PRICE K., STORN R.M., LAMPINEN J.A. Differential evolution: a Practical approach to global optimization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2005.
• 16. DHAHRI H., ALIMI A.M., ABRAHAM A. Hierarchical multi-dimensional differential evolution for the design of beta basis function neural network. Neurocomputing. 97, 131, 2012.
• 17. WANG S.D., WANG X.C., ZHANG H.B. Simulation on optimized allocation of land resource based on DE-CA model. Ecological Modelling. 314, 135, 2015.
• 18. HELON V. H. A., LEANDRO d. S. C., VIVIANA C. M., ALIREZA A. An improved free search differential evolution algorithm: A case study on parameters identification of one diode equivalent circuit of a solar cell module. Energy. 93, 1515, 2015.
• 19. BASU M. Economic environmental dispatch using multi-objective differential evolution. Applied Soft Computing. 3, 2845, 2011.
• 20. MUSRRAT A., PATRICK S., MILLIE P. An efficient Differential Evolution based algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research. 217, 404, 2012.
• 21. UROŠ M., IZTOK F., JANEZ B., BOŽIDAR P. Multi-Objective Differential Evolution for feature selection in Facial Expression Recognition systems. Expert Systems With Applications.89, 129, 2017.
• 22. GUO J., GUI W.H., YANG C.H. An improved hybrid differential evolution algorithm used for multi-objective optimization of aluminum electrolysis. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology). 4, 184, 2012.
• 23. WANG S.D. Research on regional land use structure and spatial pattern optimization under ecological constraints. Beijing Normal University, Beijing. 40, 2013.
• 24. LIU J., ZHAO M.J. The evaluation of economic benefit of land use in Baoji city. Research of Soil and Water Conservation. 18, 216, 2011.
• 25. PARTHA B., SUGANTHANA P.N., MALLIPEDDIB R., GEHAN A. Optimal power flow solutions using differential evolution algorithm integrated with effective constraint handling techniques. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 68, 81, 2018.
• 26. SHILPA S., SHYAM L. Modified differential evolution algorithm for contrast and brightness enhancement of satellite images. Applied Soft Computing. 61, 622, 2017.
• 27. ZHU B., JIN W.D., YU Z. B. Intrapulse feature evaluation model of radar emitter signal based on differential evolution, particle swarm optimization and projection pursuit algorithm. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. 53, 189, 2018.
• 28. ZHAO Z. H., ZHAO H. L. Antenna Array Null Steering Based on Constrained Differential Evolution Algorithm. Journal of Microwaves. 33, 40, 2017.
• 29. KADIR A., VOLKAN Y. Differential search algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem. Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 79, 1, 2016.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/85222