Vitality of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) at the limit of its natural range in Poland

• Autorzy: Dobrowolska D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The European beech is a major component of central European forests, and the eastern limit of its range lies in Poland. However, the Holocene migration of the beech is not yet finished, especially in NE Poland, so the northern distribution of the beech continues to change. The main goal of this study was to determine if the beech will reach its northern limit in the future. The investigation was carried out in 18 beech stands in Poland. To study the status of the health of the trees, circular plots were established in grids of different sizes. The basal beech stand area ranged from 3.7 m² ha⁻¹ to 31.2 m² ha⁻¹. The density of trees exceeded a hundred trees per hectare in most of the plots (61%), and the average degree of defoliation was not greater than 60% in all of the investigated stands. Environmental conditions influenced defoliation of beech trees (Fisher's test, F = 4.0204; P <0.0001). The vitality of the beech trees varied between stands (Kruskal-Walis test, H = 139.7433, P <0.0001) and was rather good in 56% of the study plots. Seedlings and saplings were observed in all of the investigated stands, and they covered from 5 to 39% and 21 to 80% of the study plots, respectively. Spontaneous beech regeneration was widespread and differed from stand to stand as well as within stands in all of the study plots. The number of tall seedlings in most of the study plots (56%) was greater than 10,000 individuals per hectare. The factors limiting beech regeneration were stand density and herb cover, and the number of beech seed trees influenced the quantity of small seedlings. Beech tree density positively influenced the number of small seedlings, and the strength of the correlation was moderate and statistically significant (Pearson correlation, r = 0.349). Beech tree density influenced the vitality of tall and small saplings (Pearson's correlations, r = 0.673 and r = 0.361, respectively). The spontaneous regeneration and strong vitality of seedlings and saplings suggests that beech can create stable stands in the future and that it is an expansive tree species both within its continuous range and at the limit of its distribution. It is quite possible that beech will reach its north-eastern limit in Poland in the future.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

European beech; Fagus sylvatica; deciduous forest; vitality; tree health; beech stand; defoliation; natural range; Poland

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 63
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.260-272,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dobrowolska D.

• Forest Research Institute, Sekocin Stary, Braci Lesnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• L. Bílek, J. Remeš, D. Zahradnik 2009 — Natural regeneration of senescent even-aged beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands under the conditions of Central Bohemia — J. Forest Sci. 55: 145–155.
• A. Bolte T. Czajkowski, T. Kompa 2008 — The north-eastern distribution range of European beech - a review — Forestry, 80: 413–429.
• K. Boratyńska, A. Boratyński 1990 — Systematic and geographic distribution (In: European beech Fagus sylvatica L. Ed: S. Białobok) — [Our forests tries]. Monografie Popularnonaukowe, PAN. Instytut Dendrologii w Korniku. Warszawa-Poznań, PWN (in Polish).
• R. Brumme, P.K. Khana 2009 — Functioning and Management of European Beech Ecosystems — Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 501 pp.
• P. Burschel, J. Huss, R. Kalbhenn 1964 — Die natürliche Verjüngunder Buche. Schriftenr — Forstl. Fak. Univ. Göttingen. 34, 186 pp.
• C. Collet, C. Chenost 2006 — Using competition and light estimates to predict diameter and height growth of naturally regenerated beech seedlings growing under changing canopy conditions — Forestry, 79: 489–502.
• C. Collet, Moguedec G. Le 2007 — Individual seedling mortality as a function of size, growth and competition in naturally regenerated beech seedlings — Forestry, 80: 359–370.
• C. Collet, O. Lanter, M. Pardos 2002 — Effects of canopy opening on the morphology and anatomy of naturally regenerated beech seedling — Trees, 16: 291–298.
• C. Collet, A. Piboule, O. Leroy, H. Frochot 2008 — Advance Fagus sylvatica and Acer pseudoplatanus seedlings dominate tree regeneration in a mixed broadleaved former coppice-withstandards forest — Forest Ecol. Manag. 81: 135–150.
• E. Dmyterko, A. Bruchwald 2000a — [Methods of description of the level of beech stand damage and their verification] — Sylwan, 5: 49–60 (in Polish).
• E. Dmyterko, A. Bruchwald 2000b — [Looking for the relationship between diameter increment and crown status of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)] — Sylwan, 7: 15–34 (in Polish).
• Z. Dzwonko 1990 — [Ecology] (In: [European beech Fagus sylvatica] — PWN, Warszawa-Poznań, pp. 237–328 (in Polish).
• A. Feurdean, S.A. Bhagwat, K.J. Willis, H.J.B. Birks, H. Lischke, et al. 2013 — Tree Migration-Rates: Narrowing the Gap between Inferred Post-Glacial Rates and Projected Rates — PLoS ONE 8(8): e71797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071797.
• M.N. Fotelli, M. Nam, K. Radoglou, H. Rennenberg, G. Halyvopoulos, A. Matzarakis 2009 — Seasonal and inter-annual ecophysiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) at its south-eastern distribution limit in Europe — Forest Ecol. Manag. 257: 1157–1164.
• T. Giesecke, T. Hickler, T. Kunkel, M.T. Sykes, R.H.W. Bradshaw 2007 — Towards an understanding of the Holocene distribution of Fagus sylvatica L. — J. Biogeogr. 34: 118–131.
• M. Gostyńska-Jakuszewska 1976 — Atlas of trees and shrubs distribution in Poland — PWN, Poznań-Warszawa, 26 pp.
• K. Hahn, J. Emborg, J.B. Larsen P. Madsen 2005 — Forest rehabilitation in Denmark using nature-based forestry (In: Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests, Eds: J. Stanturf, P. Madsen) — CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 299–317.
• H.A. Henriksen 1988 — Skoven og dens dirking — Danek Skovforening. Nyt Nordisk Forlag, Arnold Busck, Kobenhavn, pp. 664.
• A. Jaworski 1995 — [Silviculture characteristic of forest tree species] — Kraków, Gutenberg, 267 pp. (in Polish).
• K. Kenderes B. Mihok, T. Standovar 2008 — Thirty years of gap dynamics in a central European beech forest reserve — Forestry, 81: 111–123.
• J. Kondracki 2011 — [Regional geography of Poland] — PWN Warszawa, 444 pp.
• M. Löf, N.T. Welander 2000 — Carry-over effects on growth and transpiration in Fagus sylvatica seedlings after drought at various stages of development — Can. J. Forest Res. 30: 468–475.
• B. von Lüpke 2008 — Influence of various cutting types on natural regeneration of sessile oakbeech mixed stand - the experiment “Mastlager” of the Forest Research Station Rhineland-Palatinate in the district Eppenbrunn — Forstarchiv. 79: 4–15.
• P. Madsen 1995 — Effects of soil water content. Fertilization, light, weed competition and seedbed on natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica) — Forest Ecol. Manag. 72: 251–264.
• P. Madsen, J.B. Larsen 1997 — Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content — Forest Ecol. Manag. 97: 95–105.
• Manual Part IV 2010 — Visual Assessment of Crown Condition and Damaging Agents — ICP Forests. www.icp-forests.net
• D. Magri 2008 — Patterns of post-glacial spread and the extent of glacial refugia of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) — J. Biogeogr. 35: 450—463.
• C.R. Olsen, P. Madsen 2008 — The impact of roe deer, seedbed light and seed fall on natural beech (Fagus sylvatica) regeneration — Forest Ecol. Manag. 255: 3962–3972.
• R. Övergaard, E. Agestam, P.M. Ekö, U. Johansson 2009 — A Method for Natural Regeneration of Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) practiced in Southern Sweden — Stud. For Suecica, 218. 30 pp. ISSN 0039-3150.
• M. Pach, L. Bartkowicz 2002 — Characteristic of biomorphological features of beech, spruce, silver fir and sycamore maple in stands of Oszast reserve (Beskid Żywiecki) according to stadium and development phase of primeval forest — Sylwan, 10: 67–76.
• R. Peters 1997 — Beech forests — Geobotany. 24, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Nederland. 170 pp.
• J.F.B. Peña, J. Remeš, L. Bílek 2010 — Dynamics of natural regeneration of even-aged beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands at different shelterwood densities — J. Forest Sci. 56: 580–588.
• Princeples of silviculture 2004 — CILP, Warszawa. 178 pp.
• M. Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M. Latałowa, K. Wasylikowa, K. Tobolski, E. Madeyska, H.E. Wright Jr., Ch. Turner 2004 — Late Glacial and Holocene History of Vegetation in Poland Based on Isopollen Maps — Szafer Institute of Botany, PAS, Kraków: pp. 1–444.
• N. Ramankutty, J.A. Foley 1999 — Estimating historical changes in land cover: North American croplands from 1850 to 1992 — Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 8: 381–396.
• Report of Polish Forest Status. 2013 — CILP, Warszawa.
• A. Roloff 1989 — Kronenentwicklung und Vitalitätsbeurteilung ausgewählter Baumarten der gemässigten Breiten — Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Goettingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt (93) Frankfurt am Main.
• D.E. Silva, Mazzella P. Rezende, M. Legay, E. Corcket, J.L. Dupouey 2012 — Does natural regeneration determine the limit of European beech distribution under climatic stress? — Forest Ecol. Manag. 266: 263–272.
• J. Skrzyszewski 2012 — [European beech - silviculture] — PWRiL, Warszawa, 414 pp. (in Polish).
• T. Standovar, K. Kenders 2003 — A review on natural stand dynamics in beech woods of east central Europe — Applied Ecol. Envir. Res. 1: 19–46.
• J.C. Svenning, B. Sandel 2013 — Disequilibrium vegetation dynamics under future climate change — Am. J. Bot. 100: 1266–1286.
• J.-C. Svenning, D. Gravel, R.D. Holt, F.M. Schurr, W. Thuiller, T. Munkemuller, K.H. Schiffers, S. Dullinger, T.C. Edwards, T. Hickler, S.I. Higgins, J.E.M.S. Nabel, J. Pagel, S. Normand 2014 — The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates — Ecography, 37: 1–12.
• S. Tarasiuk 1999 — [European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) at the margins of distribution range in Poland] — Fundacja Rozwój SGGW, Warszawa, Poland, 99 pp. (in Polish).
• W. Tinner, A.F. Lotter 2006 — Holocene expansions of Fagus silvatica and Abies alba in Central Europe: Where are we after eight decades of debate? — Quaternary Sci. Rev. 25: 526–549.
• F.W.M. Vera 2000 — Grazing Ecology and Forest History — CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK. 528 pp.
• S. Wagner, C. Collet, P. Madsen, T. Nakashizuka, R.D. Nyland, K. Sagheb-Talebi 2010 — Beech regeneration research: From ecological to silvicultural aspects — Forest Ecol. Manag. 259: 2172–2182.
• A.S. Watt 1923 — On the ecology of British beechwoods with special reference to their regeneration — J. Ecol. 11: 1–48.
• N.T. Welander, B. Ottosson 1998 — The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quecus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. — Forest Ecol. Manag. 107: 117–126.
• J.H. Zar 1999 — Biostatical analysis — 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 663 pp.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15052249PJE2015.63.2.009