GMO a międzynarodowy rynek soi

• Autorzy: Rembeza J.

Warianty tytułu

EN

GMO and international soy market

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The analyses presented in the article concerned changes in the level and structure of turnover, and price relations on the international soy market. It was stated that popularisation of genetically modified soy strains had no negative impact on the volume of international turnover. However, trade directions changed considerably, especially in the European Union Member States. While significance of import from USA has decreased, the meaning of import from Brazil has increased. At the same time, however, in accordance with the analyses of price transmission, in 2004/05-2011/12 the impact of price signals generated by the Brazilian market on the EU prices decreased in comparison to 1996/97-2003/04, while the impact of the American market prices increased. The reason for these changes might have been the amendments to regulations concerning cultivation of genetically modified soy in Brazil, and stabilisation of regulations concerning the genetically modified products market in the EU.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.3-14,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Rembeza J.

• Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Radzików

Bibliografia

• 1. Bernard J.C., Pesek J.D., Fan C.: Delaware farmers adoption of GE soybeans in a time of uncertain US adoptions. Agribusiness, No. 20, 2004.
• 2. Brookes G.: The farm-level impact of herbicide-tolerant soybean in Romania. AgBioForum, No. 8, 2005.
• 3. Bullock D.S., Desquilbert M.: The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation. Food Policy, vol. 27, 2002.
• 4. Carpenter J.: Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops. Nature Biotechnology, No. 28, 2010.
• 5. Clive J.: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. ISAAA, Brief No. 43, 2011.
• 6. Falkner R., Gupta A.: The limits of regulatory convergence: globalization and GMO politics in the south. International Environmental Agreements, No. 9, 2009.
• 7. Fernandez-Cornejo J., McBride W.: Adoption of bioengineered crops. Agricultural Economic Report, USDA, 2002.
• 8. Fernandez-Cornejo J., Hendricks C., Mishra A.: Technology adoption and off-farm household income: the case of herbicide-tolerant soybeans. Journal of Agricultural Applied Economics, No. 37, 2005.
• 9. Lapan H.E., Moschini G.: Innovation and trade with endogenous market failure: the case of genetically modified products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, No. 86, 2004.
• 10. Parcell J.L., Kalaitzandonakes N.G.: Do agricultural commodity prices respond to bans against bioengineered crops? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 52, 2004.
• 11. Qaim M., Traxler G.: Roundup ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agricultural Economics, No. 32, 2005.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu