Parental care in Clinopodes flavidus koch(Chilopoda:Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae)

• Autorzy: Mitic B.M. , Ilic B. S. , Tomic V. T. , Makarov S. E. , Curcic B. P. M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Parental care in the centipede Clinopodes flavidus Koch (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae) is described for the first time: the female coils round the brood with the sterna outwards, as do the females of most geophilomorphs. Also the variation in body length and major external morphological characters of the early post-embryonic stadia are described. The peripatoid and foetus stadium are easily distinguished by the degree of segmentation of the trunk and the appendages, and by the capability of making ‘writhing’ movements. The variation in the number of leg-bearing segments in mother—offspring broods is analyzed and discussed.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Annales Zoologici
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 60
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.633-638,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Mitic B.M.

• Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Ilic B. S.

• Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Tomic V. T.

• Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Makarov S. E.

• Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Curcic B. P. M.

• Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Bibliografia

• Andersson, G. 1979. On the use of larval characters in the classification of lithobiomorph centipedes (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha), pp. 73–81. In: M. Camatini (ed), Myriapod Biology. Academic Press, London, 456 pp.
• Arthur, W. and A. D. Chipman. 2005. How does arthropod segment number evolve? — some clues from centipedes. Evolution and Development, 7: 600–607.
• Arthur, W. and J. Blackburn. 1999. Limited variation in segment number in populations of Brachygeophilus truncorum and Geophilus insculptus in Northumberland and Durham. Bulletin British Myriapod Group, 15: 9–13.
• Attems, C. G. 1929a. Die Myriapodenfauna von Albanien und Jugoslawien. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere, 56: 269–356.
• Attems, C. G. 1929b. Myriapoda. 1. Geophilomorpha. Das Tierreich, 52. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin—Leipzig, xxiii + 388 pp.
• Bonato, L. and A. Minelli. 2002. Parental care in Dicellophilus carniolensis (C. L. Koch, 1847): new behavioral evidence with implications for the higher phylogeny of centipedes (Chilopoda). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 241: 193–198.
• Bonato, L. and A. Minelli. 2008. Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 153: 253–286.
• Borucki, H. 1996. Evolution und phylogenetisches system der Chilopoda (Mandibulata, Tracheata). Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 35: 95–226.
• Dohle, W. 1985. Phylogenetic pathways in the Chilopoda. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 55: 55–66.
• Eason, E. H. 1964. Centipedes of the British Isles. Frederick Warne, London—New York. x + 294 pp.
• Edgecombe, G. D. and G. Giribet. 2004. Adding mitochondrial sequence data (16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) to the phylogeny of centipedes (Myriapoda:Chilopoda): an analysis of morphology and four molecular loci. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 42: 89–134.
• Edgecombe, G. D. and G. Giribet. 2007. Evolutionary biology of centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda). Annual Review of Entomology, 52: 151–170.
• Edgecombe, G. D., Giribet, G. and W. C. Wheeler. 1999. Phylogeny of Chilopoda: combining 18S and 28S rRNA sequences and morphology, pp. 293–331. In: A. Melic, J. J. de Haro, M. Mendez and I. Ribera (eds.). Evolución y Filogenia de Arthropoda. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 26.
• Enghoff, H., Dohle W. and J. G. Blower. 1993. Anamorphosis in millipedes (Diplopoda) — the present state of knowledge with some developmental and phylogenetic considerations. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 109: 103–234.
• Foddai, D. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships within geophilomorph centipedes based on morphological characters: a preliminary report. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 2. serie, Sezione scienze della vita 13: 67–68.
• Foddai, D. and A. Minelli. 2000. Phylogeny of geophilomorph centipedes: old wisdom and new insights from morphology, pp. 61–71. In: J. Wytwer and S. Golovatch (eds.), Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora, Fragmenta Faunistica, 43. Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
• Foddai, D., Minelli, A. and L. A. Pereira. 2002. Chilopoda. Geophilomorpha, pp. 459–474. In: J. Adis (ed.). Amazonian Arachnida and Myriapoda. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia—Moscow.
• Giribet, G., Carranza, S., Riutort, M., Baguńà, J. and C. Ribera. 1999. Internal phylogeny of the Chilopoda (Myriapoda, Arthropoda) using complete 18S rDNA and partial 28S rDNA sequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, 354: 215–222.
• Jones, T. H., Conner, W. E., Meinwald, J., Eisner, H. E. and T. Eisner. 1976. Benzoyl cyanide and mandelonitrile in the cyanogenetic secretion of a centipede. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2: 421–429.
• Kettle, C., Johnstone, J., Jowett, T., Arthur, H., and W. Arthur. 2003. The pattern of segment formation, as revealed by engrailed expression, in a centipede with a variable number of segments. Evolution & Development, 5: 198–207.
• Kos, I. 1992. A review of the taxonomy, geographical distribution and ecology of the centipedes of Yugoslavia (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). Berichte des naturwissenschaftlich-medizinischen Vereins, Suppl. 10: 353–360.
• Kos I. 1997. Post-embryonic development of Lithobius validus Meinert (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 43: 313–322.
• Lewis, J. G. E. 1981. The biology of centipedes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 476 pp.
• Matic, Z. 1972. Clasa Chilopoda. Subclasa Epimorpha, pp. 224. In: Academia Republicii Socialiste România (ed.), Fauna Republicii Socialiste România. Academia Republicii Socialiste România, Bucureşti.
• Minelli, A. 2009. Perspectives in Animal Phylogeny and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 345 pp.
• Minelli, A., Brena, C., Deflorian, G., Maruzzo D., and G. Fusco. 2006. From embryo to adult — beyond the conventional periodization of arthropod development. Development Genes and Evolution, 216: 373–383.
• Minelli, A., Pasqual, C. and G. Etonti. 1984. I Chilopodi geofilomorfi del gen. Himantarium C. L. Koch con particolare riferimento alle popolazioni Italiane. Lavori, Società Veneziana di Scienze Naturali, 9: 73–84.
• Mitić, B. M. 2001. On some centipedes (Chilopoda, Myriapoda) in Serbia. Archives of Biological Sciences, 53: 21P–22P.
• Mitić, B. M. 2002. On the diversity of centipedes (Chilopoda, Myriapoda) in Serbia. Part two. Archives of Biological Sciences, 54: 13P–14P.
• Mitić, B. M. 2005. Polimorfizam, postembrionalno razviće i filogenija Eupolybothrus (Mesobothrus) transsylvanicus (Latzel, 1882) (Lithobiidae, Chilopoda). Master's Thesis, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, 117 pp.
• Murakami, Y. 1958. The life history of Bothropolys asperatus Koch (Chilopoda, Lithobiidae). Zoological Magazine, 67: 217–223.
• Rosenberg, J., Müller, C. H. G. and G. Hilken. 2006. Ultrastructural organization of the anal organs in the anal capsule of Craterostigmus tasmanianus Pocock, 1902 (Chilopoda, Craterostigmomorpha). Journal of Morphology, 267: 265–272.
• Scheffel, H. 1969. Untersuchungen über die hormonale Regulation von Häutung und Anamorphose von Lithobius forficatus L. (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). Zoologische Jahrbücher-Abteilung für Allgemine Zoologie und Physiologie der Tiere, 74: 436–505.
• Shear, W. A. and P. M. Bonamo. 1988. Devonobiomorpha, a new order of centipedes (Chilopoda) from the middle Devonian of Gilboa, New York State, USA, and the phylogeny of centipede orders. American Museum Novitates, 2927: 1–30.
• Stoev, P. 2002. A catalogue and key to the centipedes (Chilopoda) of Bulgaria. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia-Moscow, 103 pp.
• Turcato, A., Fusco G. and A. Minelli. 1995. The sternal pore areas of geophilomorph centipedes (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115: 185–209.
• Vedel, V., Chipman, A. D., Akam, M. and W. Arthur. 2008. Temperature-dependent plasticity of segment number in an arthropod species: the centipede Strigamia maritima. Evolution & Development, 10: 488–493.
• Vedel, V., Brena, C. and W. Arthur. 2009. Demonstration of a heritable component of the variation in segment number in the centipede Strigamia maritima. Evolution & Development, 11: 434–440.
• Verhoeff, K. W. 1902–25. Chilopoda, 725 pp. In: H. G. Bronn (ed.), Hassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
• Weil, E. 1958. Zur Biologie der einheimischen Geophiliden. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie, 42: 173–209.
• Wirkner, C. S. and G. Pass. 2002. The circulatory system in Chilopoda: functional morphology and phylogenetic aspects. Acta Zoologica, 83: 193–202.