Effects of photothermal manipulations on the artificial reproduction of barbel, Barbus barbus (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae): a pilot study

• Autorzy: Kaminski R. , Korwin-Kossakowski M. , Wolnicki J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The effects of photothermal manipulations on the artificial reproduction of female Barbus barbus (L.) (age 6+, 0.3–0.8 kg body weight) were studied under controlled conditions. The experiment was preceded by a 3-month period of wintering (Light/Dark hourly regime 9L : 15D–13L : 11D; temperature 8–12°C). The experiment commenced when the photoperiod was changed promptly from 11L : 13D to 14L : 10D. As the experiment progressed, the photoperiod gradually changed to 16L : 8D. After 50 days of photostimulation, water temperature was increased from 12 to 17°C within 24 h, and stabilized for the next 14 or 22 days. When photothermal stimulation was completed (65 or 73 days, respectively), fish were treated with mGnRH-based ovulating agent Ovopel. The ovulation rate amounted to 33% and 22%, respectively for the shorter and longer stimulation time (difference insignificant at P ≤ 0.05). Longer photothermal stimulation resulted in lower variability of latency time, higher relative weight of stripped eggs, and higher relative working fecundity. The undesirable effect was the triggering of oocyte resorption in 11% of females.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 42
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.329–333,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kaminski R.

• The Stanislaw Sakowicz Inland Fisheries Institute in Olsztyn, Pond Fishery Department, Zabieniec, 05-500 Piaseczno, Poland

autor

Korwin-Kossakowski M.

• The Stanislaw Sakowicz Inland Fisheries Institute in Olsztyn, Pond Fishery Department, Zabieniec, 05-500 Piaseczno, Poland

autor

Wolnicki J.

• The Stanislaw Sakowicz Inland Fisheries Institute in Olsztyn, Pond Fishery Department, Zabieniec, 05-500 Piaseczno, Poland

Bibliografia

• Ahnelt H., Bănărescu P., Spolwind R.,Harka Á.,Waidbacher H.1998.Occurrence and distribution of three gobiid species (Pisces,Gobiidae) in the middle and upper Danube region-examples of different distribution patterns? Biologia 53 (5): 665–678.
• Anderson R.O., Neumann R.M. 1996. Length, weight and associated structural indices. Pp. 447–482. In: Murphy B.R.,Wilis D.W. (eds.) Fisheries techniques. 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, USA.
• Bănărescu P. 1970. Die Fische des ponto-kaspischen potamophilen Artenkomplexes und die karpato-kaukasische Disjunktion. Hidrobiologia (Bucureşti) 11: 135–141.
• Bancroft J.D., Gamble M. 2008. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier,Philadelphia, PA, USA.
• Bil’ko V.P. 1965. Rost byčka piesočnika v Dneprovsko-Bugskom limane. [The growth of the sand goby in the Dnieper-Bug estuary.] Gidrobiologičeskij Žurnal [Gidrobiologicheskii Zhurnal.] 1: 56–60. [In Russian.]
• Bil’ko V.P. 1968. Razmnoženije černomorskich byčkov v Dneprovsko-Bugskom limane. [Reproduction of black-sea gobies in the Dnieper-Bug estuary.] Voprosy Ichtiologii [Voprosy Ikhtiologii.] 8 (4): 669–678. [In Russian.]
• Bíró P. 1995. A folyami géb (Neogobius fluviatilis Pallas)növekedése és tápláléka a Balaton parti övében. [Dynamics and food of monkey goby (Neogobius fluviatilis Pallas) In Lake Balaton.] Halaszát 88 (4): 175–184. [In Hungarian.]
• Bunnell D.B., Madenjian C.P., Rogers M.W., Holuszko J.D.,Begnoche L.J. 2012. Exploring mechanisms underlying sex-specific differences in mortality of Lake Michigan bloaters. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141 (1): 204–214.DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2012.655124
• Campana S.E. 2001. Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. Journal of Fish Biology 59 (2): 197–242.DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00127.x
• Cinquetti R., Rinaldi L. 1987. Changes in the gonadal histology of Padogobius martensi (Pisces: Gobiidae) during the reproductive cycle. Bollettino di zoologia 54 (3): 233–241.DOI: 10.1080/11250008709355589
• Clark F.N. 1928. The weight–length relationship of the California sardine (Sardina coerulea) at San Pedro. Fish Bulletin No. 12: 1–59.
• Corkum L.D., MacInnis A.J., Wickett R.G. 1998.Reproductive habits of round gobies. Great Lakes Research Review 3 (2): 13–20.
• Corkum L.D., Sapota M.R., Skora K.E. 2004. The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Biological Invasions 6 (2): 173–181.DOI: 10.1023/B:BINV.0000022136.43502.db
• Gonçlalves E.J., Almada V.C. 1997. Sex differences In resource utilization by the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 51 (3): 624–633.DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01517.x
• Grabowska J. 2005. Reproductive biology of racer goby Neogobius gymnotrachelus in the Włocławski Reservoir (Vistula River, Poland). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21 (4):296–299.DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00675.x
• Grabowska J., Grabowski M., Kostecka A. 2009. Diet and feeding habits of monkey goby (Neogobius fluviatilis) in a newly invaded area. Biological Invasions 11 (9): 2161–2170.DOI: 10.1007/s10530-009-9499-z
• Gutowsky L.F.G., Fox M.G. 2011. Occupation, body size and sex ratio of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in established and newly invaded areas of an Ontario river. Hydrobiologia 671 (1): 27–37.DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0701-9
• Halačka K., Lusková V., Lusk S. 2000. Fecundity of Colitis elongatoides in the Nová Říše Reservoir. Folia Zoologica 49 (Suppl. 1): 141–150.
• Holčík J., Stráňai I., Andreji J. 2003. The further advance of Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814) (Pisces, Gobiidae) upstream of the Danube. Biologia 58 (5): 967–973.
• İlkyaz A.T., Metin G., Kınacıgil H.T. 2011. The use of otolith length and weight measurements in age estimations of three Gobiidae species (Deltentosteus quadrimaculatus, Gobis niger, and Lesueurigobius friesii). Turkish Journal of Zoology 35 (6): 819–827.DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1001-13
• Kostrzewa J., GrabowskiM., Zięba G. 2004. Nowe inwazyjne gatunki ryb w wodach Polski. [New invasive fish species In Polish waters.] Archives of Polish Fisheries 12 (Suppl. 2):21–34. [In Polish with English summary.]
• Kumar K.D., Adams S.M. 1977. Estimation of age structure of fish populations from length-frequency data. Pp. 256–281.In: Van Winkle W. (ed.) Proceedings of the conference on assessing the effects of power-plant induced mortality on fish populations. Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA.
• Le Cren E.D. 1951. The length–weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology 20 (2): 201–219.
• Marentette J.R.,Wang G., Tong S., Sopinka N.M., Taves M.D.,Koops M.A., Balshine S. 2011. Laboratory and field evidence of sex-biased movement in the invasive round goby.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65 (12): 2239–2249.DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1233-z
• Miller P.J. 1984. The tokology of gobioid fishes. Pp. 119–153.In: Potts G.W., Wooton R.J. (eds.) Fish reproduction strategies and tactics. Academic Press, London, UK.
• Murua H., Saborido-Rey F. 2003. Female reproductive strategies of marine fish species of the North Atlantic. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 33: 23–31.
• Neilson M.E., Stepien C.A. 2011. Historic speciation and recent colonization of Eurasian monkey gobies (Neogobius fluviatilis and N. pallasi) revealed by DNA sequences,microsatellites, and morphology. Diversity and Distribution 17 (4): 688–702.DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00762.x
• Patimar R., Mahdavi M.J., Adineh H. 2008. Biology of Sand goby Neogobius fluviatilis pallasi (Berg, 1916) in Zarrin-Gol River (East Alborz Mountain). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 15 (1): 54–64.
• Pinchuk V.I., Vasil’eva E.D., Vasil’ev V.P., Miller P.J. 2003.Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814). Pp. 223–264. In:Miller P.(ed.) The freshwater fishes of Europe. Mugilidae,Atherinidae, Atherionopsidae, Blennidae, Odontobutidae,Gobiidae 1. Vol. 8/I. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.
• Plachá M., Balážová M., Kováč V., Katina S. 2010. Age and growth of non-native monkey goby Neogobius fluviatilis (Teleostei, Gobiidae) in the River Ipeľ, Slovakia. Folia Zoologica 59 (4): 332–340.
• Polacik M., Janac M., Trichkova T., Vassilev M., Keckeis H.,Jurajda P. 2008. The distribution and abundance of the Neogobius fishes in their native range (Bulgaria), with notes on the non-native range in the Danube River. Large Riverso [Supplementband 166 for Archiv für Hydrobiologie] 18 (1–2): 193–208.
• Polačik M., Trichkova T., Janáč M., Vassilev M., Jurajda P.2008. The ichthyofauna of the shoreline zone in the longitudinal profile of the Danube River, Bulgaria. Acta Zoologia Bulgarica 60 (1): 77–88.
• Sasi H., Berber S. 2010. Some biological characteristics of monkey goby in Anatolia. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 5 (3): 229–233.DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2010.229.233
• Stemmer B. 2008. Flussgrundel im Rhein-Gewässersystem.Natur in NRW 2008 (4): 57–60.
• Tomczak M.T., Sapota M.R. 2006. The fecundity and gonad development cycle of the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus Pallas 1811) from the Gulf of Gdańsk. Oceanological and. Hydrobiological Studies 35 (4): 353–367.
• van Kessel N., Dorenbosch M., Spikmans F. 2009. First record of Pontian monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814), in the Dutch Rhine. Aquatic Invasions 4 (2):421–424.DOI: 10.3391/ai.2009.4.2.24

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu