Dynamika wiosennych zjawisk fenologicznych w drzewostanie dębu bezszypułkowego (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.)

• Autorzy: Bedkowski K.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Dynamics of the spring phenological phenomena in the sessile oak (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.) stand

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Numerous studies show that in the pedunculate and sessile oaks there are two forms that differ in terms of the spring development of leaves – one can distinguish early and late variants. Acceleration of leaves development gives the particular tree a chance to gain advantage over others, as well as enables to avoid herbivory caused by insects. However, it is fraught with the risk of damage caused by the late frosts. In turn, trees that develop leaves later can avoid losses, but they have to face the shortened growing season. The article presents the results of repeated observations of the spring development of sessile oak trees in about 90−year old stand in central Poland (19.920365° E, 51.837381° N). The trees were observed every week and classified into one of six classes of leaves development – from the absence of bud burst symptoms to the fully−developed leaf. It was found that over time, the share of trees was gradually increasing at higher and higher stages of development, while at the end of the observation period the rate of development of trees was very high. Importantly, at each stage of development, the trees emerged, which proceeded to much faster development than previously, and their share was increasing over time, as shown in the elaborated model of stand development.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; fenologia; drzewostany debowe; dab bezszypulkowy; Quercus petraea; wiosna; rozwoj fenologiczny

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 162
• Numer: 12
• Opis fizyczny: s.998-1006,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Bedkowski K.

• Zakład Geoinformatyki, Uniwersytet Łódzki, ul.S.Kopcińskiego 31, 90-142 Łódź

Bibliografia

• Adamowski W. 2008. Pierwszy w dostojności między drzewami. Cz. II. Matecznik Białowieski 1: 2-4.
• Andrzejczyk T. 2009. Dąb szypułkowy i bezszypułkowy. PWRiL, Warszawa.
• Bacilieri R., Ducousso A., Kremer A. 1995. Genetic, Morphological, Ecological and Phenological Differentiation between Quercus petraea Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a Mixed Stand of Northwest of France. Silvae Genetica 44 (1): 1-10.
• Barzdajn W. 2000. Proweniencyjne doświadczenie z dębami (Quercus robur L. i Q. petraea [Matt.] Liebl.) z 1993 r. w nad-leśnictwach Milicz i Oborniki Śląskie. Sylwan 144 (12): 57-68.
• Będkowski K., Stereńczak K. 2013. Sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl.) trees variability according to an analysis of multispectral images taken from UAV – first results. Ecological Questions 17: 25-33.
• Bobinac M., Batos B., Miljkovic D., Radulovic S. 2012. Polycyclism and phenological variability in the common oak (Quercus robur L.). Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade 64 (1): 97-105.
• Boratyński A. 1994. Zarys systematyk dębów. Sylwan 188 (10): 73-88.
• Boratyński A., Filipiak M., Kosiński P., Sekieta M. 1997. Występowanie dębu szypułkowego (Quercus robur L.), bezszypułkowego (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) i ich mieszańców (Quercus × rosacea Bechst.) w wyłączonych drzewostanach nasiennych RDLP Gdańsk. Sylwan 191 (5): 41-49.
• Boratyński A., Sztajnborn K. 2001. Dębowe drzewostany nasienne w Nadleśnictwie Runowo. Sylwan 195 (3): 43-51.
• Chmura D. J. 2002. Fenologia wiosennego rozwoju polskich proweniencji dębu szypułkowego (Quercus robur L.) i bez-szypułkowego (Q. petraea [Matt.] Liebl.). Sylwan 146 (4): 97-103.
• Csóka G. 1993. Variation in Quercus robur susceptibility to galling wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) linked to tree phonology. W: Prince P. W., Mattson W. J., Baranchikov Y. N. [red.]. The Ecology and Evolution of Gall-forming Insects. Krasnoyarsk, Siberia, August 9-13, 1993. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report NC-174: 148-152.
• Davi H., Gillmann M., Ibanez T., Cailleret M., Bontemps A., Fady B., Lefčvre F. 2011. Diversity of leaf unfolding dynamics among tree species. New insights from a study along an altitudinal gradient. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.008.
• Ducousso A., Guyon J. P., Krémer A. 1996. Latitudinal and altitudinal variation of bud burst in western populations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Ann. Sci. For. 53: 775-782.
• Fenner M. 1998. The phenology of growth and reproduction in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1 (1): 78-91.
• Fijalkowski D. 1968. Zmienność dębów szypułkowego (Quercus robur L.) i bezszypułkowego (Quercus sessilis Ehrh.) w lasach Lubelszczyzny. Sylwan 112 (12): 41-47.
• Fober H. 1994. Przegląd doświadczeń proweniencyjnych dębu szypułkowego (Quercus robur L.) i bezszypułkowego (Q. petraea Liebl.). Sylwan 138 (1): 89-97.
• Franjić J., Sever K., Bogdan S., Škvorc Ž., Krstonošić D., Alešković I. 2011. Fenološka neujednačenost kao ograničavajući čimbenik uspješnoga oprašivanja u klonskim sjemenskim plantažama hrasta lužnjaka (Quercus robur L.). Croatian Journal For. Eng. 32 (1): 141-156.
• Hernik I. 1973. Fenologiczne formy dębu szypułkowego. Sylwan 117 (7): 61-69.
• Howe G. T., Aitken S. N., Neale D. B., Jermstad K. D., Wheeler N. C., Chen T. H. H. 2003. From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees. Can. J. Bot. 81: 1247-1266.
• Kadomatsu M. 1997. Differences in Phenology of Quercus Collected from Northeastern China, Eastern Hokkaido and Western Honshu. Research Bulletin of the Hokkaido University Forests 54 (2): 188-201.
• Lechowicz M. J. 1984. Why Do Temperate Deciduous Trees Leaf Out at Different Times? Adaptation and Ecology of Forest Communities. American Naturalist 124 6: 821-842.
• Markowski R. 1993. Udział dębu szypułkowego (Quercus robur L.) i bezszypułkowego (Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl.) w zbiorowiskach leśnych Pobrzeża i Pojezierza Kaszubskiego. Sylwan 137 (12): 85-93.
• Mopper S., Simberloff D. 1995. Differential herbivory in an oak population. The role of plant phenology and insects performance. Ecology 76 (4): 1233-1241.
• Polgar C. A., Primack R. B. 2011. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytologist 191: 926-941.
• Schlarbaum S. E., Bagley W. T. 1981. Genetic Variation of Quercus rubra L., Northern Red Oak. Silvae Genetica 30 (2-3): 50-56.
• Sun S., Jin D., Li R. 2006. Leaf emergence in relation to leaf traits in temperate woody species in East-Chinese Quercus fabri forests. Acta Oecologica 30: 212-222.
• Trąba C., Wolański P., Rogut K. 2012. Fenologia i fenologiczne pory roku. Aura 5: 8-10.
• Ueno S., Klopp C., Noirot C., Léger V., Prince E., Kremer A., Plomion C., Le Provost G. 2011. Detection of genes involved in bud phenology in sessile oak (Quercus petraea Matt. Liebl) combining digital expression analysis and Q-PCR. BMC Proceedings 5 (Suppl. 7): 20.
• Utkina I. A., Rubtsov V. V. 2017. Studies of Phenological Forms of Pedunculate Oak. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 10 (7): 804-811.
• Visser M. E., Holleman L. J. M. 2001. Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268: 289-294. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1363.
• Waddell K. J., Fox C. W., White K. D. 2001. Leaf abscission phenology of a scrub oak: consequences for growth and survivorship of a leaf mining beetle. Oecologia 127: 251-258.
• Włoczewski T. 1953. Przejawy zmienności drzew w życiu lasu. Materiały Konferencji Agrobiologicznej Leśników. Rogów, 9-13 września 1952 r. PWRiL, Warszawa.