Comparison of chemical compositions of essential oils isolated by hydrodistillation from wild thyme (Thymus serpyllum L.) with use of Deryng and Clevenger apparatus

• Autorzy: Wesolowska A. , Grzeszczuk M. , Jadczak D.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Porównanie składu chemicznego olejków eterycznych wyizolowanych poprzez hydrodestylację z macierzanki piaskowej (Thymus serpyllum L.) z wykorzystaniem aparatu Derynga i Clevengera

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the studies conducted in 2012-2013 was to compare the chemical composition of essential oils isolated from wild thyme (Thymus serpyllum L.) by hydrodistillation in Deryng and Clevenger apparatus. GC-MS analysis of the isolated oils revealed that carvacrol (42.81– 45.24%), γ-terpinene (7.68–9.04%), β-caryophyllene (5.28-9.10%), β-bisabolene (5.76–6.91%) and carvacrol methyl ether (4.92–6.09%) were the major components of all the samples. On the basis of the obtained data it was proved that the type of distillation apparatus had no significant effect on the content of the main essential oil constituents of wild thyme. However, based on the means for both years of the study it was proved that hydrodistillation in Deryng apparatus was more effective for carvacrol concentration, while in Clevenger apparatus – for γ-terpinene and carvacrol methyl ether concentration. The type of distillation apparatus had no significant effect on the content of the other essential oil constituents.

PL

Celem badań prowadzonych w latach 2012–2013 było porównanie składu chemicznego olejków eterycznych wyizolowanych z macierzanki piaskowej (Thymus serpyllum L.) poprzez hydrodestylację w aparcie Derynga i Clevengera. Analiza GC-MS otrzymanych olejków wykazała, że karwakrol (42,81–45,24%), γ-terpinen (7,68–9,04%), β-kariofilen (5,30–9,10%), β-bisabolen (5,76–6,91%) i eter metylowy karwakrolu (4,92–6,09%) stanowiły dominujące składniki wszystkich analizowanych próbek. Na podstawie uzyskanych wyników wykazano, że typ wykorzystanego do destylacji aparatu nie miał istotnego wpływu na zawartość głównych składników w olejku z macierzanki piaskowej. Aczkolwiek, na podstawie analizy średnich z dwóch lat badań wykazano, że hydrodestylacja w aparacie Derynga była bardziej efektywna dla zawartości karwakrolu w olejku, natomiast hydrodestylacja w aparacie Clevengera – dla zawartości γ-terpinenu i eteru metylowego karwakrolu. Na zawartość pozostałych składników w olejku, typ zastosowanego aparatu nie miał istotnego wpływu.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Herba Polonica
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 60
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.7-17,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wesolowska A.

• Institute of Chemistry and Environmental Protection, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Aleja Piastow 42, 71-065 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Grzeszczuk M.

• Department of Horticulture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Slowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Jadczak D.

• Department of Horticulture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Slowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Hussain AI, Anwar F, Chatha SAS, Latif S, Sherazi STH, Ahmad A, Worthington J, Sarker SD. Chemical composition and bioactivity studies of the essential oils from two Thymus species from the Pakistani flora. LWT-Food Sci and Technol 2013; 50:185-192.
• 2. Stahl-Biskup E, Saez F. Thyme The Genus Thymus. London. Taylor & Francis, 2002:263-286.
• 3. Aziz S, Rehman H. Studies on the chemical constituents of Thymus serpyllum. Turk J Chem 2008; 32:605-614.
• 4. Raal A, Volkova O. Genetic resources of medicinal and aromatic plants in Estonia with research on native populations of wild thyme (Thymus serpyllum L.). In: Lipman E (ed.). Report of a working group on medicinal and aromatic plants. Second meeting, 16–18 December 2004, Strumica, Macedonia FYR. Third meeting, 26-28 June 2007, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
• 5. Steinmetz EF. Materia Medica Vegetabilis. Vol 2. 1954:171.
• 6. Khan IA, Abourashed EA. Leung’s encyclopedia of common natural ingredients used in food, drugs, and cosmetics. 3rd ed. New Yersey. Wiley, 2010:594-597.
• 7. Rehman A, Mannan A, Inayatullah S, Akhtar MZ, Qayyum M, Mirza B. Biological evaluation of wild thyme (Thymus serpyllum). Pharm Biol 2009; 47(7):628-633.
• 8. Rasooli J, Mirmostafa SA. Antibacterial properties of Thymus pubescens and Thymus serpyllum essential oils. Fitoterapia 2002; 73(3):244-250.
• 9. Agarwal I, Mathela CS. Study of antifungicidal activity of some terpenoids. Indian Drugs Pharm Ind 1979; 14:19-21.
• 10. Ahmad AM, Khokhar J, Ahmad I, Kashmiri MA, Adnan A, Ahmad M. Study of antimicrobial activity and composition by GC/MS spectroscopic analysis of the essential oil of Thymus serpyllum. Internet J of Food Safety 2006; 5:56-60.
• 11. Koedam A, Scheffer JJC, Svendsen AB. Comparison of isolation procedures for essential oils. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 1979; 168:106-111.
• 12. Baj T, Ludwiczuk A, Sieniawska E, Skalicka-Woźniak K, Widelski J, Zieba K, Głowniak K. GC-MS analysis of essential oils from Salvia officinalis L.: comparison of extraction methods of the volatile components. Acta Poloniae Pharm Drug Res 2013; 70(1):35-40.
• 13. Polish Pharmacopoeia VII, Warszawa 2006:325-326.
• 14. Polish Pharmacopoeia VI, Warszawa 2002:151.
• 15. Polish Pharmacopoeia VIII, Warszawa 2008:2891-2892.
• 16. Loziene K, Venskutonis PR. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Thymus serpyllum L. ssp. serpyllum growing wild in Lithuania. J Essent Oil Res 2006; 18:206-211.
• 17. Adams RP. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, 4th ed. Allured Publishing Corporation (USA) 2007:54-401.
• 18. Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy, 15th ed. Edinburgh, Saunders Company 2002:475.
• 19. Puri HS, Siddigni MS, Akhila A. Essential oil of Thymus serpyllum a source of thymol in India. Parfum and Kosmet 1985; 66(9):606-609.
• 20. Razden TK, Koul GL. Zur Zusammensetzung des Quendeloles (Thymian). Riechst Aromen Korpertlegemittel 1975; 25(6):166-168.
• 21. Sefidkon F, Dabiri M, Mirmostafa SA. Composition of Thymus serpyllum L. oil. J Essent Oil Res 2004; 16(3):184-185.
• 22. Lekavicius A, Jaskonis JA. The genus of thyme (Thymus L.) in Lithuania. 1. Intraspecific forms and some biochemical properties of common thyme. Proceed Acad Sci Lithuania 1967; 42:71-77.
• 23. Pióro-Jabrucka E, Osińska E. Comparative study on the variability of Thymus serpyllum L. in Poland. Annals of Warsaw Agricultural University, Horticulture (Landscape Architecture) 2003; 24:27-34.
• 24. Abu-Darwish MS, Abu Dieyeh ZH, Mufeed B, Al-Tawaha ARM, Al-dalain SYA. Trace element contents and essential oil yields from wild thyme plant (Thymus serpyllum L.) grown at different natural variable environments, Jordan. J Food, Agric Environ 2009; 7(3-4):920-924.
• 25. Raal A, Paaver U, Arak E, Orav A. Content and composition of the essential oil of Thymus serpyllum L. growing wild in Estonia. Medicina (Kaunas) 2004; 40(8):795-800.
• 26. Osińska E, Węglarz Z, Angielczyk M. Preliminary investigation on the variability of Thymus serpyllum L. growing wild in Central Poland. In: Święcicki B, Naganowska B, Wolko B (eds.). Broad Variation and Precise Characterization-Limitation for the Future. Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2002:253-256.
• 27. Sfaei-Ghomi J, Meshkatalsadat MH, Shamai S, Hasheminejad M, HassaniA. Chemical characterization of bioactive molecules of four Thymus species using nanoscale injection method. Dig J Nanomater Bios 2009; 4(4):835-841.
• 28. Verma RS, Verma RK, Chauhan A, Yadav AK. Sesonal variation in essential oil content and composition of Thyme, Thymus serpyllum L. cultivated in Uttarakhand hills. Indian J Pharm Sci 2011; 73:233-235.
• 29. Thakuri BC, Padalia RC, Mathela CS. Comparison of the volatile constituents of Thymus serpyllum from the altitude of far Western Nepal & North India. Scientific World 2009; 7(7):92-93.
• 30. Kulevanova S, Panovska TK. Antioxidant activity of essential oils of different wild Thymus L. species. Bull Chem Technol Macedonia 2001; 20(1):61-66.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/hepo-2014-0006