A morphometric approach to the specific separation of the humeri and femora of Dicraeosaurus from the Late Jurassic of Tendaguru, Tanzania

• Autorzy: Schwarz-Wings D. , Bohm N.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The two species of dicraeosaurid dinosaurs Dicraeosaurus, Dicraeosaurus hansemanni, and Dicraeosaurus sattleri, have been distinguished mainly by their differences in size and geological age, as they occur in different members of the Late Jurassic Tendaguru Formation of Tanzania. Linear and geometric morphometric measurements distinguish between the humeri and femora of both species. Linear measurements and Principal Component Analysis of Thin-plate Splines reveal strong differences in size and shape between their humeri and weak differences between their femora, also supported by a Discriminant Factor Analysis. Generally, the humerus and femur of D. hansemanni are slightly longer and more robust than those of D. sattleri. Further, the humerus is shorter in relation to the femur in D. sattleri, related to its more distally positioned deltopectoral crest, resulting in differences in its arc of movement and mechanical power. Thus, a morphological separation between the humeri and femora of D. hansemanni from the Middle Dinosaur Member and D. sattleri from the Upper Dinosaur Member of the Tendaguru Formation can be confirmed. Morphometric comparisons of the humeri and femora of Dicraeosaurus with the single known humerus and femur of Amargasaurus cazaui reveal many shape differences between the two genera, which are especially well marked in the Thin-plate Splines analysis and affect in particular the humerus. These results suggest a closer relationship between D. hansemanni and D. sattleri than between D. sattleri and A. cazaui, and a clear separation between the two genera.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 59
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.81-98,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Schwarz-Wings D.

• Museum fur Naturkunde Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany

autor

Bohm N.

• Museum fur Naturkunde Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany

Bibliografia

• Aberhan, M., Bussert, R., Heinrich, W.-D., Schrank, E., Schultka, S., Sames, B., Kriwet, J., and Kapilima, S. 2002. Palaeoecology and depositional environments of the Tendaguru Beds (Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, Tanzania). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe 5: 19–44.
• Birch, J.M. 1997. Comparing wing shape of bats: the merits of principalcomponents analysis and relative-warp analysis. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 1187–1198.
• Bonnan, M.F. 2004. Morphometric analysis of humerus and femur shape in Morrison sauropods: implications for functional morphology and paleo biology. Paleobiology 30: 444–470.
• Bonnan, M.F. 2007. Linear and geometric morphometric analysis of long bone scaling patterns in Jurassic Neosauropod dinosaurs: their functional and paleobiological implications. Anatomical Record A 290: 1089–1111.
• Bonnan, M.F., Sandrik, J.L., Nishiwaki, T., Wilhite, R.D., Elsey, R.M., and Vittore, C. 2010. Calcified cartilage shape in archosaur long bones reflects overlying joint shape in stress-bearing elements: Implications for nonavian dinosaur locomotion. Anatomical Record 293: 2044–2055.
• Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. 456 pp. Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Branca, W. 1914. Allgemeines über die Tendaguru-Expedition. Archiv für Biontologie 3: 1–13.
• Bussert, R., Heinrich, W.-D., and Aberhan, M. 2009. The Tendaguru Formation (Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, southern Tanzania): definition, palaeoenvironments, and sequence stratigraphy. Fossil Record 12: 141–174.
• Harris, J.D. 2006. The significance of Suuwassea emilieae (Dinosauria: Sauro poda) for flagellicaudatan interrelationships and evolution. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 4: 185–198.
• Heinrich, W.-D. 1999. The taphonomy of dinosaurs from the Upper Jurassic of Tendaguru (Tanzania) based on field sketches of the German Tenda guru Expedition (1909–1913). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe 2: 25–61.
• Heinrich, W.-D., Bussert, R., Aberhan, M., Hampe, O., Kapilima, S., Schrank, E., Schultka, S., Maier, G., Msaky, E., Sames, B., and Chami, R. 2001. The German-Tanzanian Tendaguru Expedition 2001. Mitteilungen aus dem Musem für Naturkunde Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe 4: 223–237.
• Janensch, W. 1914a. Bericht über den Verlauf der Tendaguru-Expedition. Archiv für Biontologie 3: 15–58.
• Janensch, W. 1914b. Übersicht über die Wirbeltierfauna der Tendaguru-Schichten, nebst einer kurzen Charakterisierung der neu aufgeführten Arten von Sauropoden. Archiv für Biontologie 3: 81–110.
• Janensch, W. 1929a. Die Wirbelsäule der Gattung Dicraeosaurus. Palaeontographica, Supplement 7 (1): 35–133.
• Janensch, W. 1929b. Material und Formengehalt der Sauropoden in der Ausbeute der Tendaguru-Expedition. Palaeontographica, Supplement 7 (1): 1–34.
• Janensch, W. 1961. Die Gliedmaszen und Gliedmaszengürtel der Sauropoden der Tendaguru-Schichten. Palaeontographica, Supplement 7 (4): 177–235.
• Rauhut, O.W.M., Remes, K., Fechner, R., Cladera, G., and Puerta, P. 2005. Discovery of a short-necked sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic period of Patagonia. Nature 435: 670–672.
• Remes, K. 2006. Revision of the Tendaguru sauropod dinosaur Tornieria africana (Fraas) and its relevance for sauropod paleobiogeography. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26: 651–669.
• Remes, K. 2009. Taxonomy of Late Jurassic diplodocid sauropods from Tendaguru (Tanzania). Fossil Record 12: 23–46.
• Rohlf, F.J. 2004a. tpsSplin Thin Plate Spline Version 1.40. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
• Rohlf, F.J. 2004b. tpsSuper Version 1.14. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
• Rohlf, F.J. 2008. tpsDig. Version 2.14. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
• Rohlf, F.J. 2010. tpsRelw. Version 1.49. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
• Salgado, L. 1999. The macroevolution of the Diplodocimorpha (Dinosauria; Sauropoda): a developmental model. Ameghiniana 36: 203–216.
• Salgado, L. and Bonaparte, J.F. 1991. Un nuevo saurópodo Dicraeosauridae, Amargasaurus cazaui gen. et sp. nov. de la Formación La Amarga, Neocomiano de la Provincia Neuquén, Argentina. Ameghiniana 28: 222–236.
• Sheets, H.D. 2004. IMP-Integrated Morphometrics Package. Department of Physics, Canisius College. Available at http://www3.canisius.edu/~sheets/morphsoft.html
• Slice, D.E. 2005. Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. 406 pp. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
• Stevens, K.A. and Parrish, M.J. 2005a. Digital reconstructions of sauropod dinosaurs and implications for feeding. In: K.A. Curry Rogers and J.A. Wilson (eds.), The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology, 178–200. University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Stevens, K.A. and Parrish, M.J. 2005b. Neck posture, dentition, and feeding strategies in Jurassic sauropod dinosaurs. In: V. Tidwell and K. Carpenter (eds.), Thunder-lizards. The Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs, 212–232. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
• Taylor, M.P. 2009. A re-evaluation of Brachiosaurus altithorax Riggs 1903 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) and its generic separation from Giraffatitan brancai (Janensch, 1914). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29: 383–806.
• Wilson, J.A. 2002. Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 217–276.
• Zelditch, M.L., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D., and Fink, W.L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. 416 pp. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.
• Zils, W., Werner, C., Moritz, A., and Saanane, C. 1995. Tendaguru, the most famous dinosaur locality of Africa. Review, survey, and future prospects. Documenta Naturae 97: 1–41.